bitpiecom官网下载苹果|conservative

作者: bitpiecom官网下载苹果
2024-03-13 05:27:41

Conservative Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

Conservative Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

Menu Toggle

Merriam-Webster Logo

Games & Quizzes

Games & Quizzes

Word of the Day

Grammar

Wordplay

Word Finder

Thesaurus

Join MWU

Shop

Books

Merch

Settings

My Words

Recents

Account

Log Out

More

Thesaurus

Join MWU

Shop

Books

Merch

Log In

Username

My Words

Recents

Account

Log Out

Est. 1828

Dictionary

Definition

adjective

noun

adjective

2

adjective

noun

Synonyms

Example Sentences

Word History

Phrases Containing

Entries Near

Cite this EntryCitation

Share

Kids DefinitionKids

Medical DefinitionMedical

More from M-W

Show more

Show more

Citation

Share

Kids

Medical

More from M-W

Save Word

To save this word, you'll need to log in.

Log In

conservative

1 of 2

adjective

con·​ser·​va·​tive

kən-ˈsər-və-tiv 

Synonyms of conservative

1

a

: of or relating to a philosophy of conservatism

b

Conservative

: of or constituting a political party professing the principles of conservatism: such as

(1)

: of or constituting a party of the United Kingdom advocating support of established institutions

(2)

: progressive conservative

2

a

: tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : traditional

conservative policies

b

: marked by moderation or caution

a conservative estimate

c

: marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners

a conservative suit a conservative architectural style

3

Conservative

: of, relating to, or practicing Conservative Judaism

4

: preservative

conservatively

adverb

conservativeness

noun

conservative

2 of 2

noun

1

a

: an adherent or advocate of political conservatism

b

Conservative

: a member or supporter of a conservative political party

2

a

: one who adheres to traditional methods or views

b

: a cautious or discreet person

Synonyms

Adjective

archconservative

brassbound

button-down

buttoned-down

die-hard

hidebound

mossbacked

old-fashioned

old-line

old-school

orthodox

paleoconservative

reactionary

standpat

traditional

traditionalistic

ultraconservative

unprogressive

Noun

archconservative

paleoconservative

reactionary

rightist

right-winger

Tory

traditionalist

See all Synonyms & Antonyms in Thesaurus 

Examples of conservative in a Sentence

Adjective

She is a liberal Democrat who married a conservative Republican.

She's more conservative now than she was in college.

Noun

His message is being well received by conservatives.

proposed legislation that was opposed by conservatives throughout the state

Recent Examples on the WebAdjective

Tangent While all three leaders have endorsed Trump’s 2024 campaign, Barrasso—the Senate Republican Conference chairman—is seen as the most conservative of the three and was the first to endorse him, while Thune and Cornyn have been critical of Trump in the past.

—Sara Dorn, Forbes, 29 Feb. 2024

McConnell and Trump had worked together during Trump's time in the White House, remaking the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary in a far more conservative image, and on tax legislation.

—Democrat-Gazette Staff From Wire Reports, arkansasonline.com, 29 Feb. 2024

Barrasso is widely seen as the most conservative of the three men.

—Kaia Hubbard, CBS News, 28 Feb. 2024

This biography charts her rise to stardom, her clashes with studios and the conservative values that embodied American society through much of her career and so much more.

—Lizz Schumer, Peoplemag, 28 Feb. 2024

Some conservative states have passed laws specifying that life begins at conception, and the Alabama court leaned heavily on Christian faith and the Bible to make its case.

—Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY, 28 Feb. 2024

Campbell County has been a conservative stronghold for Republicans in national elections for decades and supported Donald Trump in the past two elections.

—Jolene Almendarez, The Enquirer, 27 Feb. 2024

Next month, the court will hear an appeal from Louisiana, Missouri and other parties accusing administration officials of pressuring social media companies to silence conservative points of view.

—Mark Sherman, Fortune, 27 Feb. 2024

The president of the Institute for Free Speech, a conservative nonprofit in Washington, also wrote an opinion article in the Statesman supporting anti-SLAPP legislation and pointing out that Idaho is one of only a few states that doesn’t already have those protections.

—Ian Max Stevenson, Idaho Statesman, 16 Feb. 2024

Noun

The populist wing of the party exemplified by former President Donald Trump has steadily grown, prompting clashes between conservatives and more traditional, moderate Republicans.

—USA TODAY, 29 Feb. 2024

That gave evangelicals and other conservatives leery of Mr. Trump’s character a reason to rally around him with the certainty that the next president would get an immediate appointment to the court.

—Carl Hulse, New York Times, 29 Feb. 2024

The sanctuary policies have drawn intense backlash from conservatives in recent weeks following some high-profile incidents involving migrants, including a brawl with police and a shooting in Times Square.

—Natalie Kainz, NBC News, 28 Feb. 2024

Perhaps no aspect of Scott’s speakership has been more surprising than his chemistry with Youngkin, whose efforts to woo national conservatives have often put the two men at sharp ideological odds.

—Gregory S. Schneider, Washington Post, 27 Feb. 2024

And despite the fact that the laws are largely designed to protect conservative voices from suppression, some of the biggest pushback is coming from conservatives who collectively hold a supermajority on the court.

—David Meyer, Fortune, 27 Feb. 2024

Hardline conservatives have revolted over the chamber’s passage of earlier stopgap funding bills and over a topline deal the speaker struck with Schumer to set spending close to $1.66 trillion overall.

—Cnn.com Wire Service, The Mercury News, 26 Feb. 2024

The emergence of right-wing conservative Larry Elder as a replacement candidate helped boost Newsom’s campaign to remain in office.

—Taryn Luna, Los Angeles Times, 26 Feb. 2024

Offending both sides of the aisle, informing neither This week, Gemini and Gab offended conservatives and liberals alike.

—Maxwell Zeff / Gizmodo, Quartz, 23 Feb. 2024

See More

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'conservative.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

Etymology

Adjective

Middle English conservatif "tending to protect or preserve," borrowed from Middle French & Late Latin; Middle French, borrowed from Late Latin conservātīvus, from Latin conservātus, past participle of conservāre "to save or keep from danger, preserve, keep unchanged" + -īvus -ive — more at conserve entry 1

Noun

derivative of conservative entry 1

First Known Use

Adjective

14th century, in the meaning defined at sense 4 Noun

1831, in the meaning defined at sense 1a

Time Traveler

The first known use of conservative was

in the 14th century

See more words from the same century

Phrases Containing conservative

anti-conservative

Dictionary Entries Near conservative

conservatist

conservative

Conservative Baptist

See More Nearby Entries 

Cite this Entry

Style

MLA

Chicago

APA

Merriam-Webster

“Conservative.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservative. Accessed 12 Mar. 2024.

Copy Citation

Share

Post the Definition of conservative to Facebook

Facebook

Share the Definition of conservative on Twitter

Twitter

Kids Definition

conservative

1 of 2

adjective

con·​ser·​va·​tive

kən-ˈsər-vət-iv 

1

: tending to conserve or preserve

2

: of or relating to conservatism

3

: tending to preserve existing views, conditions, or institutions : traditional

4

: cautious, moderate

a conservative estimate

5

: being in agreement with the usual standards of taste or manners

a conservative suit a conservative dresser

conservatively

adverb

conservativeness

noun

conservative

2 of 2

noun

: a person who is conservative especially in politics

Medical Definition

conservative

adjective

con·​ser·​va·​tive

kən-ˈsər-vət-iv 

: not extreme or drastic

especially

: designed to preserve parts or restore or preserve function

conservative treatment of prostate cancer by watchful waiting or hormonal therapy in contrast to radical prostatectomy

compare aggressive sense 3, radical entry 1

conservatively

adverb

More from Merriam-Webster on conservative

Nglish: Translation of conservative for Spanish Speakers

Britannica English: Translation of conservative for Arabic Speakers

Last Updated:

3 Mar 2024

- Updated example sentences

Love words? Need even more definitions?

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Merriam-Webster unabridged

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Play

Play

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Play

Play

Word of the Day

ulterior

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Popular in Grammar & Usage

See All

8 Grammar Terms You Used to Know, But Forgot

Homophones, Homographs, and Homonyms

Your vs. You're: How to Use Them Correctly

Every Letter Is Silent, Sometimes: A-Z List of Examples

More Commonly Mispronounced Words

See All

Popular in Wordplay

See All

'Arsy-Varsy,' and Other Snappy Reduplicatives

The Words of the Week - Mar. 8

10 Scrabble Words Without Any Vowels

12 More Bird Names that Sound Like Insults (and Sometimes Are)

8 Uncommon Words Related to Love

See All

Games & Quizzes

See All

Quordle

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Play

Blossom Word Game

You can make only 12 words. Pick the best ones!

Play

Missing Letter

A crossword with a twist

Play

Spelling Bee Quiz

Can you outdo past winners of the National Spelli...

Take the quiz

Merriam Webster

Learn a new word every day. Delivered to your inbox!

Help

About Us

Advertising Info

Contact Us

Diversity

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

Instagram

© 2024 Merriam-Webster, Incorporated

CONSERVATIVE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary

CONSERVATIVE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary

Dictionary

Translate

Grammar

Thesaurus

+Plus

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Shop

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

My profile

+Plus help

Log out

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

My profile

+Plus help

Log out

Log in

/

Sign up

English (UK)

Search

Search

English

Meaning of conservative in English

conservativeadjective uk

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜː.və.tɪv/ us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɝː.və.t̬ɪv/

conservative adjective

(AGAINST CHANGE)

Add to word list

Add to word list

C1 not usually liking or trusting change, especially sudden change: a conservative society/outlook Older people tend to be more conservative and a bit suspicious of anything new. Compare

liberal adjective (SOCIETY)

If you are conservative in your appearance, you usually do not like fashionable or modern clothes or hairstyles: He's a very conservative dresser - he always looks like he's wearing his father's clothes!

More examplesFewer examplesHe has a very conservative approach to management.She's very conservative in her eating habits.When it comes to music, my tastes are quite conservative.

SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases

Custom, tradition & conformity

Americanization

anti-classical

anti-conventional

anti-institutional

anti-traditional

costume

counter-tradition

crowd

custom

demi-monde

mores

multicultural

multiculturalism

multiculturally

non-classical

traditionally

ultra-conservatism

ultra-conservative

ultra-traditional

unconventional

See more results »

conservative adjective

(LOW)

A conservative guess or calculation is likely to be less than the real amount: conservative estimate If I said there were three million unemployed, that would be a conservative estimate.

SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases

Cautious and vigilant

abundance

an abundance of caution idiom

askance

attentive

attentively

diligence

diligent

discreet

due diligence

gingerly

meticulously

meticulousness

mindful

minutely

narrowly

sedulous

sedulously

semi-conservative

slowly

snuffly

See more results »

Related word

conservatively Conservativeadjective uk

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜː.və.tɪv/ us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɝː.və.t̬ɪv/ (also Tory)

belonging to or supporting the British political party that traditionally supports business and opposes high taxes and government involvement in industry: the Conservative Party Conservative policies a Conservative MP/government Did you vote Conservative at the last election?

More examplesFewer examplesHe was a Conservative minister in the Thatcher government.She always votes Conservative.

SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases

Politics - general words

anti-capitalism

anti-capitalist

anti-communism

anti-communist

anti-fascism

interpellate

interpellation

interventionist

lab

laissez-faire

Orwellian

overstep

parliament

party politics

personality cult

statesman

statesmanlike

stateswoman

subsidiarity

super-conservative

See more results »

Related word

Conservatism

Conservativenoun [ C ] uk

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜː.və.tɪv/ us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɝː.və.t̬ɪv/ (also Tory)

someone who belongs to or supports the Conservative Party of Great Britain (= a political party that traditionally supports business and opposes high taxes and government involvement in industry), or a similar party in another country: She's a staunch (= very loyal) Conservative. The Conservatives won an overall majority of ninety.

More examplesFewer examplesThe scheme is opposed by the Conservatives who have pledged to abolish it.Some prominent Conservatives have said they won't vote for him.He has been a Conservative all his life.

SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases

Politics - general words

anti-capitalism

anti-capitalist

anti-communism

anti-communist

anti-fascism

interpellate

interpellation

interventionist

lab

laissez-faire

Orwellian

overstep

parliament

party politics

personality cult

statesman

statesmanlike

stateswoman

subsidiarity

super-conservative

See more results »

(Definition of conservative from the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press)

conservative | American Dictionary

conservativeadjective us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜr·və·t̬ɪv/

conservative adjective

(SOCIAL)

Add to word list

Add to word list

tending to emphasize the importance of preserving traditional cultural and religious values, and to oppose change, esp. sudden change

If you are conservative in your appearance, you wear clothes in traditional colors and styles: He wore a conservative business suit for his interview.

conservatively adverb us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜr·və·t̬ɪv·li/

She was conservatively dressed in a gray suit.

conservative adjective

(POLITICAL)

politics & government tending to emphasize the importance of personal responsibility and traditional values and to oppose depending on government for social services: conservative Republicans

conservative noun [ C ] us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜr·və·t̬ɪv/

The Congressional committee had an equal number of conservatives and liberals.

conservative adjective

(LOW)

(of guesses and calculations) likely to be less than the real amount: Even by conservative estimates, the company will lose $2,000,000 this year.

(Definition of conservative from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)

conservative | Business English

conservativeadjective uk

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/kənˈsɜːvətɪv/ us

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

Add to word list

Add to word list

not involving or taking unnecessary risks: The firm has always had a conservative approach to investment.

lower than the real figure or amount seems likely to be: a conservative estimate/figure

(Definition of conservative from the Cambridge Business English Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)

What is the pronunciation of conservative, Conservative?

 

C1

Translations of conservative

in Chinese (Traditional)

反對改變, 保守的, 守舊的…

See more

in Chinese (Simplified)

反对改变, 保守的, 守旧的…

See more

in Spanish

conservador, de vestimenta conservadora, por lo bajo…

See more

in Portuguese

conservador, conservadora, conservador/-ra [masculine-feminine]…

See more

in more languages

in Marathi

in Japanese

in Turkish

in French

in Catalan

in Dutch

in Tamil

in Hindi

in Gujarati

in Danish

in Swedish

in Malay

in German

in Norwegian

in Urdu

in Ukrainian

in Russian

in Telugu

in Arabic

in Bengali

in Czech

in Indonesian

in Thai

in Vietnamese

in Polish

in Korean

in Italian

सनातनी, परंपरावादी, पारंपारिक…

See more

保守的な, 保守党(支持者), 保守的(ほしゅてき)な…

See more

tutucu, muhafazakâr, sağcı…

See more

conservateur/-trice, conventionnel/-elle, bas/basse…

See more

conservador, -a…

See more

conservatief…

See more

பொதுவாக மாற்றத்தை விரும்புவதில்லை அல்லது நம்புவதில்லை, குறிப்பாக திடீர் மாற்றம், உங்கள் தோற்றத்தில் நீங்கள் பழமைவாதியாக இருந்தால்…

See more

रूढ़िवादी, अनुदारवादी, (प्रायः अपने पहनावे में) रूढ़िवादी…

See more

રૂઢીચુસ્ત, રૂઢિવાદી…

See more

konservativ…

See more

konservativ…

See more

kolot, konservatif…

See more

konservativ…

See more

konservativ, tradisjonell, høyreorientert…

See more

قدامت پرست, لیکر کا فقیر, جدت کا مخالف…

See more

консервативний, реакційний…

See more

консервативный, сторонник консервативной партии Великобритании…

See more

సాప్రదాయిక, సాధారణంగా ఇష్టపడటం లేక నమ్మకం లేదు, ముఖ్యంగా ఆకస్మిక మార్పు…

See more

مُحافِظ, تَقليدي…

See more

রক্ষণশীল, গোঁড়া…

See more

konzervativní…

See more

kolot, konservatif…

See more

ที่เป็นอนุรักษ์นิยม, (พรรคการเมือง) ที่เป็นอนุรักษ์นิยม…

See more

bảo thủ…

See more

konserwatywny, konserwatyst-a/ka…

See more

보수주의의, 보수당…

See more

conservatore, conservatorio…

See more

Need a translator?

Get a quick, free translation!

Translator tool

 

Browse

conservation biology

BETA

conservation of momentum

BETA

conservationist

conservatism

conservative

conservative estimate

Conservative Judaism

conservatively

conservator

More meanings of conservative

All

non-conservative

semi-conservative

super-conservative

ultra-conservative

conservative estimate

Conservative Judaism

non-Conservative, at non-conservative

See all meanings

Word of the Day

response

UK

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/rɪˈspɒns/

US

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

/rɪˈspɑːns/

an answer or reaction

About this

Blog

Forget doing it or forget to do it? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (2)

March 06, 2024

Read More

New Words

inverse vaccine

March 11, 2024

More new words

has been added to list

To top

Contents

EnglishAmericanBusinessTranslations

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024

Learn

Learn

Learn

New Words

Help

In Print

Word of the Year 2021

Word of the Year 2022

Word of the Year 2023

Develop

Develop

Develop

Dictionary API

Double-Click Lookup

Search Widgets

License Data

About

About

About

Accessibility

Cambridge English

Cambridge University Press & Assessment

Consent Management

Cookies and Privacy

Corpus

Terms of Use

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

My profile

+Plus help

Log out

Dictionary

Definitions

Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English

English

Learner’s Dictionary

Essential British English

Essential American English

Translations

Click on the arrows to change the translation direction.

Bilingual Dictionaries

English–Chinese (Simplified)

Chinese (Simplified)–English

English–Chinese (Traditional)

Chinese (Traditional)–English

English–Dutch

Dutch–English

English–French

French–English

English–German

German–English

English–Indonesian

Indonesian–English

English–Italian

Italian–English

English–Japanese

Japanese–English

English–Norwegian

Norwegian–English

English–Polish

Polish–English

English–Portuguese

Portuguese–English

English–Spanish

Spanish–English

English–Swedish

Swedish–English

Semi-bilingual Dictionaries

English–Arabic

English–Bengali

English–Catalan

English–Czech

English–Danish

English–Gujarati

English–Hindi

English–Korean

English–Malay

English–Marathi

English–Russian

English–Tamil

English–Telugu

English–Thai

English–Turkish

English–Ukrainian

English–Urdu

English–Vietnamese

Translate

Grammar

Thesaurus

Pronunciation

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Shop

Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

My profile

+Plus help

Log out

Log in /

Sign up

English (UK)  

Change

English (UK)

English (US)

Español

Русский

Português

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

中文 (简体)

正體中文 (繁體)

Polski

한국어

Türkçe

日本語

Tiếng Việt

Nederlands

Svenska

Dansk

Norsk

हिंदी

বাঙ্গালি

मराठी

ગુજરાતી

தமிழ்

తెలుగు

Українська

Follow us

Choose a dictionary

Recent and Recommended

Definitions

Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English

English

Learner’s Dictionary

Essential British English

Essential American English

Grammar and thesaurus

Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English

Grammar

Thesaurus

Pronunciation

British and American pronunciations with audio

English Pronunciation

Translation

Click on the arrows to change the translation direction.

Bilingual Dictionaries

English–Chinese (Simplified)

Chinese (Simplified)–English

English–Chinese (Traditional)

Chinese (Traditional)–English

English–Dutch

Dutch–English

English–French

French–English

English–German

German–English

English–Indonesian

Indonesian–English

English–Italian

Italian–English

English–Japanese

Japanese–English

English–Norwegian

Norwegian–English

English–Polish

Polish–English

English–Portuguese

Portuguese–English

English–Spanish

Spanish–English

English–Swedish

Swedish–English

Semi-bilingual Dictionaries

English–Arabic

English–Bengali

English–Catalan

English–Czech

English–Danish

English–Gujarati

English–Hindi

English–Korean

English–Malay

English–Marathi

English–Russian

English–Tamil

English–Telugu

English–Thai

English–Turkish

English–Ukrainian

English–Urdu

English–Vietnamese

Dictionary +Plus

Word Lists

Choose your language

English (UK)  

English (US)

Español

Русский

Português

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

中文 (简体)

正體中文 (繁體)

Polski

한국어

Türkçe

日本語

Tiếng Việt

Nederlands

Svenska

Dansk

Norsk

हिंदी

বাঙ্গালি

मराठी

ગુજરાતી

தமிழ்

తెలుగు

Українська

Contents

English 

 

Adjective 

conservative (AGAINST CHANGE)

conservative (LOW)

AdjectiveNoun

American 

 

Adjective 

conservative (SOCIAL)

conservative (POLITICAL)

conservative (LOW)

Adverb 

conservatively

Noun 

conservative

Business 

 Adjective

Translations

Grammar

All translations

My word lists

Add conservative to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

More

Go to your word lists

Tell us about this example sentence:

The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word.

The sentence contains offensive content.

Cancel

Submit

The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word.

The sentence contains offensive content.

Cancel

Submit

Conservatism - Wikipedia

Conservatism - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Search

Search

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1Themes

Toggle Themes subsection

1.1Tradition

1.2Hierarchy

1.3Realism

1.4Authority

1.5Reactionism

2Intellectual history

Toggle Intellectual history subsection

2.1Proto-conservatism

2.2Philosophical founders

3Ideological variants

Toggle Ideological variants subsection

3.1Liberal conservatism

3.2Libertarian conservatism

3.3Fiscal conservatism

3.4National conservatism

3.5Traditionalist conservatism

3.6Cultural conservatism

3.7Social conservatism

3.8Religious conservatism

3.9Paternalistic conservatism

3.10Progressive conservatism

3.11Authoritarian conservatism

4National variants

Toggle National variants subsection

4.1Asia

4.1.1India

4.1.2Singapore

4.1.3South Korea

4.2Europe

4.2.1Austria

4.2.2Belgium

4.2.3Denmark

4.2.4Finland

4.2.5France

4.2.6Germany

4.2.7Greece

4.2.8Iceland

4.2.9Italy

4.2.10Luxembourg

4.2.11Netherlands

4.2.12Norway

4.2.13Russia

4.2.14Sweden

4.2.15Switzerland

4.2.16Ukraine

4.2.17United Kingdom

4.3Latin America

4.3.1Brazil

4.3.2Chile

4.3.3Colombia

4.4North America

4.4.1Canada

4.4.2United States

4.5Oceania

4.5.1Australia

4.5.2New Zealand

5Psychology

Toggle Psychology subsection

5.1Conscientiousness

5.2Disgust sensitivity

5.3Authoritarianism

5.4Ambiguity intolerance

5.5Social dominance orientation

5.6Happiness

6Prominent conservative politicians

7See also

Toggle See also subsection

7.1National variants

7.2Ideological variants

7.3Related topics

8References

9Bibliography

10Further reading

11External links

Toggle the table of contents

Conservatism

125 languages

AfrikaansAlemannischአማርኛالعربيةAragonésঅসমীয়াAsturianuАварAzərbaycancaتۆرکجهবাংলাBân-lâm-gúБашҡортсаБеларускаяБеларуская (тарашкевіца)БългарскиBoarischBosanskiBrezhonegБуряадCatalàČeštinaCymraegDanskالدارجةDeutschEestiΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoEuskaraفارسیFiji HindiFøroysktFrançaisFryskGaeilgeGalego한국어HausaՀայերենहिन्दीHrvatskiIdoIgboIlokanoBahasa IndonesiaInterlinguaÍslenskaItalianoעבריתКъарачай-малкъарქართულიҚазақшаKernowekKiswahiliKriyòl gwiyannenKurdîКыргызчаLatinaLatviešuLëtzebuergeschLietuviųLimburgsLingua Franca NovaLombardMagyarМакедонскиമലയാളംमराठीმარგალურიمصرىمازِرونیBahasa MelayuМонголမြန်မာဘာသာNederlandsनेपाली日本語НохчийнNorsk bokmålNorsk nynorskOccitanOʻzbekcha / ўзбекчаਪੰਜਾਬੀپنجابیپښتوPatoisភាសាខ្មែរPiemontèisPolskiPortuguêsRomânăRumantschРусиньскыйРусскийСаха тылаShqipසිංහලSimple EnglishSlovenčinaSlovenščinaکوردیСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSuomiSvenskaTagalogதமிழ்Татарча / tatarçaతెలుగుไทยTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوئۇيغۇرچە / UyghurcheVènetoTiếng ViệtWinaray吴语ייִדיש粵語ZazakiŽemaitėška中文

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadEditView history

Tools

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadEditView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

In other projects

Wikimedia CommonsWikiquote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Political philosophy focused on retaining traditional social institutions

"Conservatives" redirects here. For specific political parties, see Conservative Party.

This article is about conservatism as a political and social philosophy. For other uses of conservatism and conservative, see Conservatism (disambiguation).

Not to be confused with Conservation movement.

Part of a series onConservatism

Variants

Authoritarian

Corporatist

Cultural

Fiscal

Green

Liberal

Libertarian

Moderate

National

Paternalistic

Populist

Pragmatic

Progressive

Reactionary

Religious

Social

Traditionalist

Ultra

Principles

Ancestral worship

Authority

Traditional

Class collaboration

Convention

Cultural heritage

Culture of life

Pro-Life

Custom

Discipline

Duty

Elitism

Aristocracy

Meritocracy

Noblesse oblige

Ethical order

Familialism

Family values

Fundamentalism

Gender roles

Complementarianism

Historism

Honour

Imperialism

Law and order

Loyalty

Maternalism

Monarchism

Royalism

Ordered liberty

Organicism

Orthodoxy

Patriotism

 Property rights

Public morality

Social hierarchy

Social institutions

Social norms

Social order

Sovereignty

Stewardship

Subsidiarity

Tradition

Intellectuals

Johnson

Hume

Burke

More

Maistre

Bonald

Haller

Chateaubriand

Coleridge

Karamzin

Savigny

Newman

Tocqueville

Cortés

Taine

Le Bon

Belloc

Iorga

Chesterton

Spengler

Savarkar

Schmitt

Jünger

Evola

Strauss

Röpke

Oakeshott

Burnham

Lefebvre

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Gómez Dávila

Kirk

Koselleck

Buckley

Sowell

Mansfield

Scruton

Hitchens

Works

Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

Considerations on France (1796)

Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism (1798)

The Genius of Christianity (1802)

On the Pope (1819)

Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)

Democracy in America (1835)

The Concept of the Political (1932)

The Conservative Mind (1953)

The Conscience of a Conservative (1960)

How to Be a Conservative (2014)

Politicians

Adams

Pitt

Canning

Metternich

Disraeli

Bismarck

Salisbury

Dmowski

Mannerheim

Baldwin

Maurras

Horthy

Metaxas

Churchill

Adenauer

De Gasperi

Chiang

Salazar

De Gaulle

Dollfuss

Franco

Reagan

Powell

Pinochet

Marcos

Park

Smith

Suharto

Lee

Thatcher

Kohl

Fujimori

Trump

Netanyahu

Modi

Bolsonaro

Orbán

Meloni

Organizations

Centrist Democrat International

European Conservatives and ReformistsParty

European People's Party

Identity and Democracy

International Democrat Union

Muslim Brotherhood

Tradition, Family, Property

Religion

Anglo-Catholicism

Christian right

Clericalism

Confucianism

Conservative Christianity

Hindutva

Islamism

Jewish conservatism

Religious Zionism

Traditionalist Catholicism

Integralism

Ultramontanism

Traditionalist School

Perennialism

Personal variants

Berlusconism

Cameronism

Chiangism

Erdoğanism

Francoism

Fujimorism

Gaullism

Janismo

Maurrassisme

Mellismo

Metaxism

Powellism

Pinochetism

Putinism

Reaganism

Sarkozysm

Thatcherism

Trumpism

National variants

Australia

Austria

Bangladesh

Belgium

Belize

Brazil

Canada

Colombia

Cuba

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Guatemala

Hong Kong

Iceland

India

Italy

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Pakistan

Peru

Panama

Russia

Serbia

Singapore

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

South Korea

Taiwan

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

United States

Historical background

Ancien Régime

Bourbon Restauration

Congress of Vienna

Conservative Order

Counter-Enlightenment

Counter-revolution

German Romanticism

Holy Alliance

Ultra-royalism

White Terror

Related ideologies

Agrarianism

Christian democracy

Clerical fascism

Communitarianism

Conservative liberalism

Corporatism

Ordoliberalism

Related topics

Anti-communism

Anti-gender movement

Black conservatism

United States

Catholic social teaching

Conservative feminism

Conservative wave

Hispanic conservatism

United States

LGBT conservatism

Nativism

Neoauthoritarianism (China)

Patriarchy

Right realism

Right-wing politics

Authoritarianism

Far

New

Radical

Small-c conservative

Toryism

 Conservatism portal

 Politics portalvte

Conservatism is a cultural, social, and political philosophy that seeks to promote and to preserve traditional institutions, customs, and values.[1][2][3] The central tenets of conservatism may vary in relation to the culture and civilization in which it appears.[4] In Western culture, depending on the particular nation, conservatives seek to promote a range of institutions, such as the nuclear family, organized religion, the military, the nation-state, property rights, rule of law, aristocracy, and monarchy.[5] Conservatives tend to favour institutions and practices that guarantee social order and historical continuity.[6]

Edmund Burke, an 18th-century Anglo-Irish statesman who opposed the French Revolution but supported the American Revolution, is credited as one of the philosophers of conservatism in the beginning stage,[7] with the other being Joseph de Maistre during a similar time period.[8] [9] The first established use of the term in a political context originated in 1818 with François-René de Chateaubriand during the period of Bourbon Restoration that sought to roll back the policies of the French Revolution and establish social order.[10]

Conservative thought has varied considerably as it has adapted itself to existing traditions and national cultures.[11] Thus, conservatives from different parts of the world—each upholding their respective traditions—may disagree on a wide range of issues. Historically associated with right-wing politics, the term has been used to describe a wide range of views. Conservatism may be either more libertarian or more authoritarian; more populist or more elitist; more progressive or more reactionary; more moderate or more extreme.[12][13]

Themes[edit]

Some political scientists, such as Samuel P. Huntington, have seen conservatism as situational. Under this definition, conservatives are seen as defending the established institutions of their time.[14] According to Quintin Hogg, the chairman of the British Conservative Party in 1959: "Conservatism is not so much a philosophy as an attitude, a constant force, performing a timeless function in the development of a free society, and corresponding to a deep and permanent requirement of human nature itself."[15] Conservatism is often used as a generic term to describe a "right-wing viewpoint occupying the political spectrum between [classical] liberalism and fascism".[1]

Not all conservatives consider a free society an important part of conservative philosophy, and have a more skeptical view of human nature. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Edmund Burke, often called the father of conservative philosophy, shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that 'illusions' and 'prejudices' are socially necessary. He believed that most human beings are innately depraved, steeped in original sin, and unable to better themselves with their feeble reason. Better, he said, to rely on the 'latent wisdom' of prejudice, which accumulates slowly through the years, than to 'put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason.' Among such prejudices are those that favour an established church and a landed aristocracy; members of the latter, according to Burke, are the 'great oaks' and 'proper chieftains' of society, provided that they temper their rule with a spirit of timely reform and remain within the constitutional framework.'"[16]

Tradition[edit]

Despite the lack of a universal definition, certain themes can be recognised as common across conservative thought. According to Michael Oakeshott:

To be conservative […] is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss.[17]

Such traditionalism may be a reflection of trust in time-tested methods of social organisation, giving 'votes to the dead'.[18] Traditions may also be steeped in a sense of identity.[18]

Hierarchy[edit]

In contrast to the tradition-based definition of conservatism, some left-wing political theorists like Corey Robin define conservatism primarily in terms of a general defense of social and economic inequality.[19] From this perspective, conservatism is less an attempt to uphold old institutions and more "a meditation on—and theoretical rendition of—the felt experience of having power, seeing it threatened, and trying to win it back".[20] On another occasion, Robin argues for a more complex relation:

Conservatism is a defense of established hierarchies, but it is also fearful of those established hierarchies. It sees in their assuredness of power the source of corruption, decadence and decline. Ruling regimes require some kind of irritant, a grain of sand in the oyster, to reactivate their latent powers, to exercise their atrophied muscles, to make their pearls.[21]

Political philosopher Yoram Hazony argues that, in a traditional conservative community, members have importance and influence to the degree they are honoured within the social hierarchy, which includes factors such as age, experience, and wisdom.[22] The word hierarchy has religious roots and translates to 'rule of a high priest.'[23]

Realism[edit]

Conservatism has been called a "philosophy of human imperfection" by Noël O'Sullivan, reflecting among its adherents a negative view of human nature and pessimism of the potential to improve it through 'utopian' schemes.[24] The "intellectual godfather of the realist right", Thomas Hobbes, argued that the state of nature for humans was "poor, nasty, brutish, and short", requiring centralised authority.[25]

Authority[edit]

Authority is a core tenet of conservatism.[26][27][28] More specifically, conservatives tend to believe in traditional authority. This form of authority, according to Max Weber, is "resting on an established belief in the sanctity of immemorial traditions and the legitimacy of those exercising authority under them".[29][30] Alexandre Kojève distinguishes between two different forms of traditional authority:

The Authority of the Father—represented by actual fathers as well as conceptual fathers such as priests and monarchs.

The Authority of the Master—represented by aristocrats and military commanders.[31]

Robert Nisbet acknowledges that the decline of traditional authority in the modern world is partly linked with the retreat of old institutions such as guild, order, parish, and family—institutions that formerly acted as intermediaries between the state and the individual.[32][33] Hannah Arendt claims that the modern world suffers an existential crisis with a "dramatic breakdown of all traditional authorities," which are needed for the continuity of an established civilisation.[34][35]

Reactionism[edit]

Main article: Reactionary

Reactionism is a tradition in right-wing politics that opposes policies for the social transformation of society.[36] In popular usage, reactionism refers to a staunch traditionalist conservative political perspective of a person who supports the status quo and opposes social, political, and economic change.[37] Some adherents of conservatism, rather than opposing change, seek to return to the status quo ante and tend to view the modern world in a negative light, especially concerning mass culture and secularism, although different groups of reactionaries may choose different traditional values to revive.[6][38]

Some political scientists, such as Corey Robin, treat the words reactionary and conservative as synonyms.[39] Others, such as Mark Lilla, argue that reactionism and conservatism are distinct worldviews.[40] Francis Wilson defines conservatism as "a philosophy of social evolution, in which certain lasting values are defended within the framework of the tension of political conflict".[41]

Thus some reactionaries favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which that person believes possessed positive characteristics absent from contemporary society. An early example of a powerful reactionary movement was German Romanticism, which centered around concepts of organicism, medievalism, and traditionalism against the forces of rationalism, secularism, and individualism that were unleashed in the French Revolution.[42]

In political discourse, being a reactionary is generally regarded as negative; Peter King observed that it is "an unsought-for label, used as a torment rather than a badge of honor".[43] Despite this, the descriptor has been adopted by writers such as the Italian esoteric traditionalist Julius Evola,[44] the Austrian monarchist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn,[45] the Colombian political theologian Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and the American historian John Lukacs.[46]

Intellectual history[edit]

Proto-conservatism[edit]

Part of the Politics series onToryism

Characteristics

Agrarianism

Classicism

Counterrevolution

High Church (Anglicanism)

High culture

Interventionism

Loyalism

Monarchism

Noblesse oblige

Traditionalism

Traditional Catholicism

Royalism

Unionism

General topics

Cavaliers

Cavalier Parliament

Château Clique

Conservative corporatism

Divine right of kings

Family Compact

Jacobitism

Oxford Movement

Powellism

People

Robert Filmer

1st Earl of Clarendon

Roger L'Estrange

1st Earl of Rochester

1st Viscount Bolingbroke

Samuel Johnson

3rd Earl of Bute

1st Duke of Wellington

Walter Scott

Stanley Baldwin

G. K. Chesterton

Winston Churchill

Enoch Powell

George Grant

Related topics

Carlism

Chouans

Cristeros

Conservatism

Distributism

High Tory

Legitimism

Loyalism

Miguelism

Pink Tory

Reactionary

Red Tory

Spanish American royalism

Sanfedismo

Tory socialism

Traditionalist conservatism

Ultra-Tories

Vendéens

Viva Maria

Veronese Easter

vte

In Great Britain, the Tory movement during the Restoration period (1660–1688) was a form of proto-conservatism that supported a hierarchical society with a monarch who ruled by divine right. However, Tories differ from most later, more moderate, mainstream conservatives in that they opposed the idea of popular sovereignty and rejected the authority of parliament and freedom of religion. Robert Filmer's royalist treatise Patriarcha (published in 1680 but written before the English Civil War of 1642–1651) became accepted as the statement of their doctrine.

However, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 damaged this principle by establishing a constitutional government in England, leading to the hegemony of the Tory-opposed Whig ideology. Faced with defeat, the Tories reformed their movement. They adopted more moderate conservative positions, such as holding that sovereignty was vested in the three estates of Crown, Lords, and Commons rather than solely in the Crown.[47] Richard Hooker (1554–1600), Marquess of Halifax (1633–1695) and David Hume (1711–1776) were proto-conservatives of the period. Halifax promoted pragmatism in government whilst Hume argued against political rationalism and utopianism.[10][48]

Philosophical founders[edit]

Edmund Burke (1729–1797) has been regarded as one of the philosophical founders of modern conservatism,[49][50] predominantly in the British region. Burke served as the private secretary to the Marquis of Rockingham and as official pamphleteer to the Rockingham branch of the Whig party.[51] Together with the Tories, they were the conservatives in the late 18th century United Kingdom.[52]

Edmund Burke (1729–1797)

As a follower of the Whig Party, Burke's views were a mixture of conservatism and republicanism. [53] He supported the American Revolution of 1775–1783 but abhorred the violence of the French Revolution of 1789–1799. He accepted the conservative ideals of private property and the economics of Adam Smith (1723–1790), but thought that economics should remain subordinate to the conservative social ethic, that capitalism should be subordinate to the medieval social tradition, and that the business class should be subordinate to aristocracy.[54] He insisted on standards of honour derived from the medieval aristocratic tradition and saw the aristocracy as the nation's natural leaders.[55] That meant limits on the powers of the Crown, since he found the institutions of Parliament to be better informed than commissions appointed by the executive. He favored an established church, but allowed for a degree of religious toleration.[56] Burke ultimately justified the social order on the basis of tradition: tradition represented the wisdom of the species, and he valued community and social harmony over social reforms.[57]

Joseph de Maistre (1753–1821)

Another form of conservatism was developed in France in parallel to conservatism in Britain. It was influenced by Counter-Enlightenment works by philosophers such as Joseph de Maistre (1753–1821), as well as Louis de Bonald (1754–1840). Many European continental conservatives of that time did not support separation of church and state, with most supporting state cooperation with the Catholic Church, such as had existed in France before the Revolution. Conservatives were also early to embrace nationalism, which was previously associated with liberalism and the Revolution in France.[58] Another early French conservative, François-René de Chateaubriand (1768–1848), espoused a romantic opposition to modernity, contrasting its emptiness with the 'full heart' of traditional faith and loyalty.[59] Elsewhere on the continent, German thinkers Justus Möser (1720–1794) and Friedrich von Gentz (1764–1832) criticized the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen that came of the Revolution. Opposition was also expressed by German idealists such as Adam Müller (1779–1829) and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1771–1830), the latter inspiring both leftist and rightist followers.[60]

Both Burke and Maistre were critical of democracy in general, though their reasons differed. Maistre was pessimistic about humans being able to follow rules, while Burke was skeptical about humans' innate ability to make rules. For Maistre, rules had a divine origin, while Burke believed they arose from custom. The lack of custom for Burke, and the lack of divine guidance for Maistre, meant that people would act in terrible ways. Both also believed that liberty of the wrong kind led to bewilderment and political breakdown. Their ideas would together flow into a stream of anti-rationalist, romantic conservatism, but would still stay separate. Whereas Burke was more open to argumentation and disagreement, Maistre wanted faith and authority, leading to a more illiberal strain of thought in contrast[61]

Ideological variants[edit]

Liberal conservatism[edit]

Main article: Liberal conservatism

Not to be confused with Conservative liberalism.

Ulf Kristersson, leader of the liberal-conservative Moderate Party and incumbent Prime Minister of Sweden

Liberal conservatism is a variant of conservatism that is strongly influenced by liberal stances.[62] It incorporates the classical liberal view of minimal economic interventionism, meaning that individuals should be free to participate in the market and generate wealth without government interference.[63] However, individuals cannot be thoroughly depended on to act responsibly in other spheres of life; therefore, liberal conservatives believe that a strong state is necessary to ensure law and order, and social institutions are needed to nurture a sense of duty and responsibility to the nation.[63]

Originally opposed to capitalism and the industrial revolution,[64][65] the conservative ideology in many countries adopted economic liberalism. This is especially the case in countries where liberal economic ideas have been the norm such as the United States and are thus considered conservative.[66]

Post-World War II Germany developed a special form of liberal conservatism called ordoliberalism, which is centered around the concept of ordered liberty.[67] Neither socialist nor capitalist, it promotes a compromise between state and market, and argues that the national culture of a country must be taken into account when implementing economic policies.[68] Alexander Rüstow and Wilhelm Röpke were two prominent exponents of this economic theory, and its implementation is largely credited as a reason behind the German miracle—the rapid reconstruction and development of the war-wrecked economies of West Germany and Austria after World War II.[69]

Libertarian conservatism[edit]

Main article: Libertarian conservatism

Libertarian conservatism describes certain political ideologies most prominently within the United States which combine libertarian economic issues with aspects of conservatism. Its four main branches are constitutionalism, paleolibertarianism, limited government conservatism, and Christian libertarianism. They generally differ from paleoconservatives, in that they favor more personal and economic freedom. The agorist philosopher Samuel Edward Konkin III labeled libertarian conservatism right-libertarianism.[70] Frank Meyer coined the term fusionism to describe the combination of traditionalist and social conservatism with political and economic right-libertarianism.[71]

In contrast to paleoconservatives, libertarian conservatives support strict laissez-faire policies such as free trade and opposition to business regulations and any national bank. They are often opposed to environmental regulations, corporate welfare, subsidies, and other areas of economic intervention. Many conservatives, especially in the United States, believe that the government should not play a major role in regulating business and managing the economy. They typically oppose high taxes and income redistribution. Such efforts, they argue, only serve to exacerbate the scourge of unemployment and poverty by lessening the ability for businesses to hire employees due to higher tax impositions.[citation needed]

Fiscal conservatism[edit]

Main article: Fiscal conservatism

2009 Taxpayer March on Washington as conservative protesters walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C.

Fiscal conservatism is the economic philosophy of prudence in government spending and debt.[72] In Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), Edmund Burke argued that a government does not have the right to run up large debts and then throw the burden on the taxpayer:

[I]t is to the property of the citizen, and not to the demands of the creditor of the state, that the first and original faith of civil society is pledged. The claim of the citizen is prior in time, paramount in title, superior in equity. The fortunes of individuals, whether possessed by acquisition or by descent or in virtue of a participation in the goods of some community, were no part of the creditor's security, expressed or implied...[T]he public, whether represented by a monarch or by a senate, can pledge nothing but the public estate; and it can have no public estate except in what it derives from a just and proportioned imposition upon the citizens at large.

National conservatism[edit]

Main article: National conservatism

Giorgia Meloni, leader of the national-conservative party Brothers of Italy as well as the first female Prime Minister of Italy

National conservatism is a political term used primarily in Europe to describe a variant of conservatism which concentrates more on national interests than standard conservatism as well as upholding cultural and ethnic identity,[73] while not being outspokenly ultra-nationalist or supporting a far-right approach.[74]

National conservatism is oriented towards upholding national sovereignty, which includes limited immigration and a strong national defence. In Europe, national conservatives are usually eurosceptics.[75][76] Yoram Hazony has argued for national conservatism in his work The Virtue of Nationalism (2018).[77]

Traditionalist conservatism[edit]

Main article: Traditional conservatism

Traditionalist conservatism, also known as classical conservatism, emphasizes the need for the principles of natural law, transcendent moral order, tradition, hierarchy, organicism, agrarianism, classicism, and high culture as well as the intersecting spheres of loyalty.[78] Some traditionalists have embraced the labels reactionary and counter-revolutionary, defying the stigma that has attached to these terms since the Enlightenment. Having a hierarchical view of society, many traditionalist conservatives, including a few notable Americans such as Ralph Adams Cram,[79] William S. Lind,[80] and Charles A. Coulombe,[81] defend the monarchical political structure as the most natural and beneficial social arrangement.

Cultural conservatism[edit]

Main article: Cultural conservatism

Cultural conservatives support the preservation of a cultural heritage, either of a nation or a shared culture that is not defined by national boundaries. The shared culture may be as divergent as Western culture or Chinese culture. In the United States, the term "cultural conservative" may imply a conservative position in the culture war. Cultural conservatives hold fast to traditional ways of thinking even in the face of monumental change, strongly believing in traditional values and traditional politics.[82]

Social conservatism[edit]

Main article: Social conservatism

2012 March for Life in Paris, France

Social conservatives believe that society is built upon a fragile network of relationships which need to be upheld through duty, traditional values, and established institutions; and that the government has a role in encouraging or enforcing traditional values or practices. A social conservative wants to preserve traditional morality and social mores, often by opposing what they consider radical policies or social engineering.[83] Some social-conservative stances are the following:

Support of a culture of life and opposition to the destruction of human life at any stage, including abortion, embryonic stem cells research, and euthanasia.

Support of bioconservatism and opposition to both eugenics and transhumanism.[84]

Support of traditional family values, viewing the nuclear family model as society's foundational unit.

Support of a traditional definition of marriage as being one man and one woman, and opposition to expansion of civil marriage and child adoption to couples in same-sex relationships.

Support of public morality with prohibition of drugs and prostitution and censorship of pornography.

Support of organized religion and opposition to atheism and secularism, especially when militant.[85][86][87]

Religious conservatism [edit]

See also: Christian democracy, Christian right, Hindutva, Integralism, Islamism, Religious Zionism, and Haredi Judaism

Logo for the Traditionalist Catholic activist organization Tradition, Family, Property

Religious conservatism principally applies the teachings of particular religions to politics—sometimes by merely proclaiming the value of those teachings, at other times by having those teachings influence laws.[88]

In most democracies, political conservatism seeks to uphold traditional family structures and social values. Religious conservatives typically oppose abortion, LGBT behaviour (or, in certain cases, identity), drug use,[89] and sexual activity outside of marriage. In some cases, conservative values are grounded in religious beliefs, and conservatives seek to increase the role of religion in public life.[90]

Paternalistic conservatism[edit]

Main article: Paternalistic conservatism

Paternalistic conservatism is a strand in conservatism which reflects the belief that societies exist and develop organically and that members within them have obligations towards each other.[91] There is particular emphasis on the paternalistic obligation (noblesse oblige) of those who are privileged and wealthy to the poorer parts of society, which is consistent with principles such as duty, organicism, and hierarchy. Paternal conservatives support neither the individual nor the state in principle, but are instead prepared to support either or recommend a balance between the two depending on what is most practical.[92] Paternalistic conservatives historically favour a more aristocratic view and are ideologically related to High Tories.[citation needed]

In more contemporary times, its proponents stress the importance of a social safety net to deal with poverty, supporting limited redistribution of wealth along with government regulation of markets in the interests of both consumers and producers.[93] Paternalistic conservatism first arose as a distinct ideology in the United Kingdom under Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli's "One Nation" Toryism.[94] There have been a variety of one-nation conservative governments in the United Kingdom with exponents such as Prime Ministers Disraeli, Stanley Baldwin, Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill, and Harold Macmillan.[95]

In 19th-century Germany, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck adopted a set of social programs, known as state socialism, which included insurance for workers against sickness, accident, incapacity, and old age. The goal of this conservative state-building strategy was to make ordinary Germans, not just the Junker aristocracy, more loyal to state and Emperor.[6] Chancellor Leo von Caprivi promoted a conservative agenda called the "New Course".[96]

Progressive conservatism[edit]

Main article: Progressive conservatism

In the United States, Theodore Roosevelt has been identified as the main exponent of progressive conservatism. Roosevelt stated that he had "always believed that wise progressivism and wise conservatism go hand in hand".[97] The Republican administration of President William Howard Taft was progressive conservative, and he described himself as a believer in progressive conservatism.[97] President Dwight D. Eisenhower also declared himself an advocate of progressive conservatism.[98]

In Canada, a variety of conservative governments have been part of the Red Tory tradition, with Canada's former major conservative party being named the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada from 1942 to 2003.[99] Prime Ministers Arthur Meighen, R. B. Bennett, John Diefenbaker, Joe Clark, Brian Mulroney, and Kim Campbell led Red tory federal governments.[99]

Authoritarian conservatism[edit]

Main article: Authoritarian conservatism

See also: Far-right politics

King Alexander I of Yugoslavia and Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss of Austria, authoritarian conservative statesmen who were assassinated by fascist and Nazi political enemies

Authoritarian conservatism refers to autocratic regimes that center their ideology around national conservatism, rather than ethnic nationalism, though certain racial components such as antisemitism may exist.[100][101][102][103] Authoritarian conservative movements show strong devotion towards religion, tradition, and culture while also expressing fervent nationalism akin to other far-right nationalist movements. Examples of authoritarian conservative statesmen include Miklós Horthy in Hungary,[104] Ioannis Metaxas in Greece,[105] António de Oliveira Salazar in Portugal,[106] Engelbert Dollfuss in Austria,[107] and Francisco Franco in Spain.[108]

Authoritarian conservative movements were prominent in the same era as fascism, with which it sometimes clashed.[109] Although both ideologies shared core values such as nationalism and had common enemies such as communism and materialism, there was nonetheless a contrast between the traditionalist nature of authoritarian conservatism and the revolutionary, palingenetic, and populist nature of fascism—thus it was common for authoritarian conservative regimes to suppress rising fascist and Nazi movements.[110] The hostility between the two ideologies is highlighted by the struggle for power in Austria, which was marked by the assassination of the ultra-Catholic statesman Engelbert Dollfuss by Austrian Nazis. Likewise, Croatian fascists assassinated King Alexander I of Yugoslavia.[111] In Romania, as the fascist Iron Guard was gaining popularity and Nazi Germany was making advances on the European political stage, King Carol II ordered the execution of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and other top-ranking Romanian fascists.[112] The exiled German Emperor Wilhelm II was an enemy of Adolf Hitler, stating that Nazism made him ashamed to be a German for the first time in his life and referring to the Nazis as ”a bunch of shirted gangsters" and "a mob … led by a thousand liars or fanatics”.[113][114]

Political scientist Seymour Martin Lipset has examined the class basis of right-wing extremist politics in the 1920–1960 era. He reports:

Conservative or rightist extremist movements have arisen at different periods in modern history, ranging from the Horthyites in Hungary, the Christian Social Party of Dollfuss in Austria, Der Stahlhelm and other nationalists in pre-Hitler Germany, and Salazar in Portugal, to the pre-1966 Gaullist movements and the monarchists in contemporary France and Italy. The right extremists are conservative, not revolutionary. They seek to change political institutions in order to preserve or restore cultural and economic ones, while extremists of the centre [fascists/nazis] and left [communists/anarchists] seek to use political means for cultural and social revolution. The ideal of the right extremist is not a totalitarian ruler, but a monarch, or a traditionalist who acts like one. Many such movements in Spain, Austria, Hungary, Germany, and Italy have been explicitly monarchist […] The supporters of these movements differ from those of the centrists, tending to be wealthier, and more religious, which is more important in terms of a potential for mass support.[115]

Edmund Fawcett contrasts authoritarian conservatism with fascism, he claims that fascism is totalitarian, populist, and anti-pluralist, whereas authoritarian conservatism is somewhat pluralist but most of all elitist and anti-populist. He concludes: "The fascist is a nonconservative who takes anti-liberalism to extremes. The right-wing authoritarian is a conservative who takes fear of democracy to extremes."[116]

During the Cold War, right-wing military dictatorships were prominent in Latin America, with most nations being under military rule by the middle of the 1970s.[117] One example of this was General Augusto Pinochet, who ruled over Chile from 1973 to 1990.[118] In the 21st century, the authoritarian style of government experienced a worldwide renaissance with conservative statesmen such as Vladimir Putin in Russia, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey, Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Narendra Modi in India, and Donald Trump in the United States.[119]

National variants[edit]

Conservative parties vary widely from country to country in the goals they wish to achieve. Both conservative and classical liberal parties tend to favour private ownership of property, in opposition to communist, socialist, and green parties, which favour communal ownership or laws regulating responsibility on the part of property owners. Where conservatives and liberals differ is primarily on social issues, where conservatives tend to reject behaviour that does not conform to some social norm. Modern conservative parties often define themselves by their opposition to liberal or socialist parties.

The United States usage of the term conservative is unique to that country.[120][further explanation needed]

Asia[edit]

India[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in India

In India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Narendra Modi, represent conservative politics. With over 170 million members as of October 2022,[121][122] the BJP is by far the world's largest political party.[123] It promotes Hindu nationalism, quasi-fascist Hindutva, a hostile foreign policy against Pakistan, and a conservative social and fiscal policy.[124]

Singapore[edit]

See also: Lee Kuan Yew

Singapore's only conservative party is the People's Action Party (PAP). It is currently in government and has been since independence in 1965. It promotes conservative values in the form of Asian democracy and Asian values.[125]

South Korea[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in South Korea

This article is part of a series onConservatismin South Korea

Schools

Authoritarian

Ilminism

Corporate

Cultural

Fiscal

Libertarian

Moderate

Paternalistic

warm

Progressive

Populist

State-aligned nationalism

Social

Traditional

Hongik Ingan

neo-Confucian

Principles

Anti-communism

Asian values

Confucianism

Communitarianism

Christian right

Economic interventionism

Economic liberalism

Free trade

Elitism

Meritocracy

Family values

Moral absolutism

Protectionism

Tradition

People

Ahn Cheol-soo

Chung Mong-joon

Gong Byeong-ho

Lee Beom-seok

Lee Hoi-chang

Lee Jun-seok

Lee Myung-bak

Ha Tae-keung

Hong Joon-pyo

Kim Chong-in

Kim Gu

Kim Jin-pyo

Kim Jong-pil

Kim Kyu-sik

Kim Moo-sung

Kim Seong-su

Kim Young-sam

Na Kyung-won

Park Chung Hee

Park Geun-hye

Park Heong-joon

Park Sang-hak

Roh Tae-woo

Syngman Rhee

Yi Munyeol

Yoo Seong-min

Yoon Suk Yeol

Parties (mainstream)

Democratic Republican Party

Democratic Justice Party

Future Korea Party

Democratic Liberal Party

Grand National Party

Korea Nationalist Party

Liberal Party

Liberty Korea Party

National Association

New Korea Party

People's Future Party

People Power Party (present)

Saenuri Party (2012–2017)

United Future Party

Parties (minor)

Bareun Party

Bareunmirae Party

Dawn of Liberty Party (present)

Free Korea 21

Korea Democratic Party (de facto)

Korea Independence Party

Korean National Party

National Youth

New Conservative Party

New National Participation Party

Our Republican Party (2017)

Our Republican Party (2020) (present)

People First Party

People Party

Saenuri Party

Unification National Party

United Liberal Democrats

Think tanks

The Yeouido Institute

Media

Chosun Ilbo

TV Chosun

Dong-a Ilbo

Channel A

JoongAng Ilbo

JTBC

The Korea Economic Daily

Kukmin Ilbo

Maeil Business Newspaper

MBN

Munhwa Ilbo

Segye Ilbo

Other organizations

Center for Free Enterprise

Christian Council of Korea

FFNK

Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations

NKnet (disputed)

Taegukgi organizations

Unification Church (disputed)

Related topics

Anti-Chinese sentiment

Anti-North sentiment

Chaebol

Chojoongdong

Politics of South Korea

New Right

 Conservatism portal

 South Korea portalvte

South Korean politician and army general Park Chung Hee seized power in the May 16 coup of 1961, after which he was elected as the third President of South Korea. He introduced the highly authoritarian Yushin Constitution, ushering in the Fourth Republic. He ruled the country as a dictator until his assassination in 1979.[126]

South Korea's major conservative party, the People Power Party, has changed its form throughout its history. First it was the Democratic-Liberal Party and its first head was Roh Tae-woo, who was the first President of the Sixth Republic of South Korea. Democratic-Liberal Party was founded by the merging of Roh Tae-woo's Democratic Justice Party, Kim Young Sam's Reunification Democratic Party and Kim Jong-pil's New Democratic Republican Party. Kim Young-sam became the fourteenth President of Korea.

When the conservative party was beaten by the opposition party in the general election, it changed its form again to follow the party members' demand for reforms. It became the New Korea Party, but it changed again one year later since the President Kim Young-sam was blamed by the citizen for the International Monetary Fund.[clarification needed] It changed its name to Grand National Party (GNP). Since the late Kim Dae-jung assumed the presidency in 1998, GNP had been the opposition party until Lee Myung-bak won the presidential election of 2007.

Europe[edit]

European conservatism has taken many different expressions. During the first half of the 20th century, as socialism was gaining power around the world, conservatism in countries such as Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, and Spain transformed into the far-right, becoming more authoritarian and extreme.[127]

European nations, with the exception of Switzerland, have had a long monarchical tradition throughout history. Today, existing monarchies are Andorra, Belgium, Denmark, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Some reactionary movements in republican nations, such as Action Française in France, the Monarchist National Party in Italy, and the Black-Yellow Alliance in Austria, have advocated the restoration of the monarchy.

Austria[edit]

Part of a series onConservatism in Austria

Themes

Austrian nationalism

Catholic social teaching

Christian democracy

Clericalism

Corporate statism

Green conservatism

Imperialism

Liberal conservatism

Monarchism

Multiculturalism

Organicism

Political Catholicism

Subsidiarity

Tradition

Intellectuals

Burger

Feigl

von Gentz

von Hayek

von Hofmannsthal

von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Mannheim

Müller

Schönfeld

Spann

Tschugguel

von Vogelsang

Politicians

von Coudenhove-Kalergi

Dollfuss

Figl

von Gentz

von Habsburg

Haider

von Hohenwart

Klaus

Kurz

Nehammer

Schuschnigg

von Metternich

de Paula Maria

Raab

Rosenkranz

Schüssel

Stadler

Starhemberg

Taaffe

von Vogelsang

PartiesActive

Alliance for the Future of Austria

Austrian People's Party

Christian Party of Austria

Freedom Party of Austria

Defunct

Catholic People's Party

Christian Social Party

Fatherland Front

The Reform Conservatives

Team Stronach

Organisations

Black-Yellow Alliance

Heimwehr

Media

Kleine Zeitung

Neues Volksblatt

Salzburger Nachrichten

Tiroler Tageszeitung

Wiener Zeitung

Österreich

History

Austria-Hungary

Austrian Civil War

Austrian Empire

Carlsbad Decrees

Congress of Vienna

Federal State of Austria

Habsburg monarchy

Related topics

Austrian nobility

Conservatism in Germany

Culture of Austria

German nationalism in Austria

Pan Germanism

 Conservatism portal

 Austria portalvte

Austrian conservatism originated with Prince Klemens von Metternich (1773–1859), who was the architect behind the monarchist and imperialist Conservative Order that was enacted at the Congress of Vienna in the aftermath of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars.[6] The goal was to establish a European balance of power that could guarantee peace and suppress republican and nationalist movements.[128] During its existence, the Austrian Empire was the third most populous monarchy in Europe after the Russian Empire and the United Kingdom. Following its defeat in the Austro-Prussian War, it transformed into the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which was the most diverse state in Europe with twelve nationalities living under a unifying monarch.[129] The Empire was fragmented in the aftermath of World War I, ushering in the democratic First Austrian Republic.

The Austrian Civil War in 1934 saw a series of skirmishes between the right-wing government and socialist forces. When the insurgents were defeated, the government declared martial law and held mass trials, forcing leading socialist politicians, such as Otto Bauer, into exile.[130] The conservatives banned the Social Democratic Party and replaced parliamentary democracy with a corporatist and clerical constitution. The Patriotic Front, into which the paramilitary Heimwehr and the Christian Social Party were merged, became the only legal political party in the resulting authoritarian regime, the Federal State of Austria.[131]

While having close ties to Fascist Italy, which was still a monarchy as well as a fellow Catholic nation, rightist Austria harboured strong anti-Prussian and anti-Nazi sentiment. Austria’s most influential conservative philosopher, the Catholic aristocrat Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, published many books in which he interpreted Nazism as a leftist, ochlocratic, and demagogic ideology, opposed to the traditional rightist ideals of aristocracy, monarchy, and Christianity.[132] Austria's dictator Engelbert Dollfuss saw Nazism as another form of totalitarian communism, and he saw Adolf Hitler as the German version of Joseph Stalin. The conservatives banned the Austrian Nazi Party and arrested many of its activists.[133] In 1934, Dollfus was assassinated by Nazi enemies who sought revenge.[107] In response, Benito Mussolini mobilised a part of the Italian army on the Austrian border and threatened Hitler with war in the event of a German invasion of Austria. In 1938, when Nazi Germany annexed Austria in the Anschluss, conservative groups were suppressed: members of the Austrian nobility and the Catholic clergy were arrested and their properties were confiscated.[134]

Following World War II and the return to democracy, Austrian conservatives abandoned the authoritarianism of its past, believing in the principles of class collaboration and political compromise, while Austrian socialists also abandoned their extremism and distanced themselves from the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union.[135] The conservatives formed the Austrian People's Party, which has been the major conservative party in Austria ever since. In contemporary politics, the party was led by Sebastian Kurz, whom the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung nicknamed the "young Metternich".[136]

Belgium[edit]

Having its roots in the conservative Catholic Party, the Christian People's Party retained a conservative edge through the 20th century, supporting the King in the Royal Question, supporting nuclear family as the cornerstone of society, defending Christian education, and opposing euthanasia. The Christian People's Party dominated politics in post-war Belgium. In 1999, the party's support collapsed, and it became the country's fifth-largest party.[137][138][139] Since 2014, the Flemish nationalist and conservative New Flemish Alliance is the largest party in Belgium.[140]

Denmark[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Denmark

Principles

Agrarianism

Lutheranism

Monarchism

National romanticism

Nationalism

Nativism

Patriotism

Populism

Property rights

Rule of law

State church

Tradition

Intellectuals

Bjørnvig

Kierkegaard

Krarup

Langballe

Løgstrup

Møller

Oehlenschläger

Politicians

Kjærsgaard

Krarup

Langballe

Mikkelsen

Møller (Aksel)

Møller (John)

Møller (Per)

Reedtz-Thott

Schlüter

Støjberg

Vermund

Ørsted

Parties

Conservative People's Party

Danish People's Party

Denmark Democrats

Free Conservatives

Højre

New Right

People's Party

Progress Party

Media

Billed Bladet

Dags-Telegrafen

Det nye Danmark

Heretica

Jyllands-Posten

Punch

Tidehverv

Related topics

Culture of Denmark

Canon

Danish Realm

Jyllands-Posten controversy

 Conservatism portal

 Denmark portalvte

Danish conservatism emerged with the political grouping Højre (literally "Right"), which due to its alliance with King Christian IX of Denmark dominated Danish politics and formed all governments from 1865 to 1901. When a constitutional reform in 1915 stripped the landed gentry of political power, Højre was succeeded by the Conservative People's Party of Denmark, which has since then been the main Danish conservative party.[141] Another Danish conservative party was the Free Conservatives, who were active between 1902 and 1920. Traditionally and historically, conservatism in Denmark has been more populist and agrarian than in Sweden and Norway, where conservatism has been more elitist and urban.[142]

The Conservative People's Party led the government coalition from 1982 to 1993. The party had previously been member of various governments from 1916 to 1917, 1940 to 1945, 1950 to 1953, and 1968 to 1971. The party was a junior partner in governments led by the Liberals from 2001 to 2011[143] and again from 2016 to 2019. The party is preceded by 11 years by the Young Conservatives (KU), today the youth movement of the party.

The Conservative People's Party had a stable electoral support close to 15 to 20% at almost all general elections from 1918 to 1971. In the 1970s it declined to around 5%, but then under the leadership of Poul Schlüter reached its highest popularity level ever in 1984, receiving 23% of the votes. Since the late 1990s the party has obtained around 5 to 10% of the vote. In 2022, the party received 5.5% of the vote.[144]

Conservative thinking has also influenced other Danish political parties. In 1995, the Danish People's Party was founded, based on a mixture of conservative, nationalist, and social-democratic ideas.[141] In 2015, the party New Right was established, professing a national-conservative attitude.[145]

The conservative parties in Denmark have always considered the monarchy a central institution in Denmark.[146][147][148][149]

Finland[edit]

The conservative party in Finland is the National Coalition Party. The party was founded in 1918, when several monarchist parties united. Although right-wing in the past, today it is a moderate liberal-conservative party. While advocating economic liberalism, it is committed to the social market economy.[150]

There has been strong anti-Russian and anti-communist sentiment in Finland due to its long history of being invaded and conquered by Russia and the Soviet Union.[151][152] In the Finnish Civil War of 1918, the rightist White Finland defeated the leftist Red Finland.[153] The paramilitary White Guard, led by Baron Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, was assisted by the German Imperial Army at the request of the Finnish civil government. The far-right Lapua movement continued to terrorize communists in post-war Finland, but it was banned after a failed coup d'etat attempt in 1932.[154]

France[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in France

Ideologies

French nationalism

Integral

Nouvelle Droite

Gaullism

Political Catholicism

Integralism

Ultramontanism

Révolution nationale

Royalism

Bonapartism

Legitimism

Maurrassisme

Orléanism

Ultra-royalism

Sarkozysm

Principles

Anti-communism

Catholic social teaching

Christian democracy

Counter-revolution

Elitism

Noblesse oblige

Family values

Monarchism

Restauration

Patriotism

 Social hierarchy

Social order

Souverainism

Traditional authority

Traditionalism

Intellectuals

Barbey d'Aurevilly

Bainville

Barrès

Barruel

Bellamy

de Benoist

Blanc de Saint-Bonnet

de Bonald

Boutang

de Chateaubriand

Daudet

Dimier

Faye

Ferré

Guénon

de Gobineau

de Jouvenel

de La Mennais

Le Bon

Lefebvre

Lemaître

Le Play

de Maistre

Massis

Maurras

des Mousseaux

d'Ornellas

Pujo

de Rivarol

Rueff

Taine

de Tocqueville

Veuillot

Zemmour

Works

Considerations on France (1796)

Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism (1797)

The Genius of Christianity (1802)

On the Pope (1819)

Democracy in America (1835)

An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races (1855)

The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (1895)

The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times (1945)

The French Suicide (2014)

Politicians

Bellamy

de Bonald

Cathelineau

de Chateaubriand

Ciotti

de La Tour du Pin

de Gaulle

Juppé

Le Pen (Jean-Marie)

Le Pen (Marine)

Maurras

MacMahon

Pécresse

Poincaré

Poisson

de Polignac

Sarkozy

Schuman

de Vaublanc

de Villèle

Zemmour

PartiesActive

Alliance Royale

Debout la France

French Future

The Nationalists

Future with Confidence

National Centre of Independents & Peasants

Reconquête

The Republicans

Soyons libres

VIA, the Way of the People

Defunct

Feuillants

French Agrarian and Peasant Party

French Social Party

Movement for France

Independent Republicans

Party of Order

Rally for France

Rally for the Republic

Republican Federation

Resistance Party

OrganisationsActive

Action Française

Initiative and Liberty Movement

La Manif pour tous

March for Life

Student Cockade

Union Nationale Inter-universitaire

Defunct

Camelots du Roi

Cercle Proudhon

Civitas

Croix-de-Feu

Independent Republicans

Media

CNews

Famille chrétienne

L'Écho du Sud

La Croix

La Nation française

Le Figaro

Le Figaro Magazine

Le Point

Minute

Radio Courtoisie

Valeurs actuelles

Related topics

Ancien Régime

Bourbon Restoration

French Revolution

Monarchiens

First White Terror

Second White Terror

Sinistrisme

Vichy France

 Conservatism portal

 France portalvte

Early conservatism in France focused on the rejection of the secularism of the French Revolution, support for the role of the Catholic Church, and the restoration of the monarchy.[155] After the first fall of Napoleon in 1814, the House of Bourbon returned to power in the Bourbon Restoration. Louis XVIII and Charles X, brothers of the executed King Louis XVI, successively mounted the throne and instituted a conservative government intended to restore the proprieties, if not all the institutions, of the Ancien Régime.[156]

After the July Revolution of 1830, Louis Philippe I, a member of the more liberal Orléans branch of the House of Bourbon, proclaimed himself as King of the French. The Second French Empire saw an Imperial Bonapartist regime of Napoleon III from 1852 to 1870. The Bourbon monarchist cause was on the verge of victory in the 1870s, but then collapsed because the proposed king, Henri, Count of Chambord, refused to fly the tri-colored flag.[157] The turn of the century saw the rise of Action Française – an ultraconservative, reactionary, nationalist, and royalist movement that advocated the restoration of the monarchy.[158]

Religious tensions between Christian rightists and secular leftists heightened in the 1890–1910 era, but moderated after the spirit of unity in fighting World War I.[159] An authoritarian form of conservatism characterized the Vichy regime of 1940–1944 with heightened antisemitism, opposition to individualism, emphasis on family life, and national direction of the economy.[160]

Conservatism has been the major political force in France since World War II, although the number of conservative groups and their lack of stability defy simple categorization.[161] Following the war, conservatives supported Gaullist groups and parties, espoused nationalism, and emphasized tradition, social order, and the regeneration of France.[162] Unusually, post-war conservatism in France was formed around the personality of a leader—army officer Charles de Gaulle who led the Free French Forces against Nazi Germany—and it did not draw on traditional French conservatism, but on the Bonapartist tradition.[163] Gaullism in France continues under The Republicans (formerly Union for a Popular Movement), a party previously led by Nicolas Sarkozy, who served as President of France from 2007 to 2012 and whose ideology is known as Sarkozysm.[164]

In 2021, the French intellectual Éric Zemmour founded the nationalist party Reconquête, which has been described as a more elitist and conservative version of Marine Le Pen’s National Rally.[165]

Germany[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Germany

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Germany

Ideologies

Agrarian

Christian democracy

Green

Liberal

Ordo

Ritter School

Nationalist

Neue Rechte

Völkisch

Paternalistic

State Socialism

Progressive

Revolutionary

Young

Romanticism

Hegelianism

Historical School

Principles

Christian values

Duty

Gemeinschaft

Heimat

In Treue fest

Kultur

Medievalism

Monarchism

Organicism

 Patriotism

Prussian virtues

Sittlichkeit

Social hierarchy

Social market economy

Sonderweg

Subsidiarity

Traditional authority

Volksgeist

Intellectuals

von Galen

Gehlen

von Gerlach

Görres

Hegel

Jünger (Ernst)

Jünger (Friedrich)

Koselleck

Mann (early)

Möser

Moeller van den Bruck

Müller

Nolte

Novalis

von Ranke

Rauschning

Ritter (Gerhard)

Ritter (Joachim)

Röpke

Rüstow

von Savigny

Schlegel

Schmitt

Spaemann

Spengler

Stahl

Stoecker

Strauss

Tönnies

von Treitschke

Voegelin

Wackenroder

Works

Addresses to the German Nation (1806)

Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)

Lectures on the Philosophy of History (1837)

Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man (1918)

The Decline of the West (1918, 1922)

Prussianism and Socialism (1919)

The Concept of the Political (1932)

On the Marble Cliffs (1939)

Politicians

Adenauer

von Bismarck

Dregger

Fehrenbach

Filbinger

von Gerlach

 Goerdeler

Hugenberg

Jung

 Kohl

Merkel

Merz

von Papen

Rauschning

von Schleicher

Stresemann

vom Stein

von Storch

Strauss

Weidel

von Westarp

PartiesActive

Alternative for Germany

Christian Democratic Union of Germany

Christian Social Union in Bavaria

Centre Party

The Republicans

Defunct

Bavarian People's Party

Conservative Party

Free Conservative Party

German Conservative Party

German National People's Party

German People's Party

Organisations

Forum of German Catholics

Gerhard Löwenthal Prize

German Burschenschaft

Hanns Seidel Foundation

Hans Filbinger Foundation

Konrad Adenauer Foundation

Queen Louise League

Studienzentrum Weikersheim

Tradition und Leben

Media

Antaios

Bild

Cicero

Deutsche Rundschau

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

Junge Freiheit

Kreuzzeitung

Süddeutsche Monatshefte

Der Türmer

Die Welt

Related topics

Bibliothek des Konservatismus

Conservatism in Austria

Erklärung 2018

Freikorps

German Reich

German militarism

Historikerstreit

The Junkers

Liberalism in Germany

Monarchism in Bavaria after 1918

Pan-Germanism

Stahlhelm-Fraktion

Völkisch movement

 Conservatism portal

 Germany portalvte

Germany was the heart of the reactionary Romantic movement that swept Europe in the aftermath of the progressive Age of Enlightenment and its culmination in the anti-conservative French Revolution.[42] German Romanticism was deeply organicist and medievalist, finding expression philosophically among the Old Hegelians and judicially in the German historical school. Prominent conservative exponents were Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis, Wilhelm Heinrich Wackenroder, Friedrich Carl von Savigny, and Adam Müller.[166]

During the second half of the 19th century, German conservatism developed alongside nationalism, culminating in Germany's victory over France in the Franco-Prussian War, the creation of the unified German Empire in 1871, and the simultaneous rise of Otto von Bismarck on the European political stage. Bismarck's "balance of power" model maintained peace in Europe for decades at the end of the 19th century. His "revolutionary conservatism" was a conservative state-building strategy, based on class collaboration and designed to make ordinary Germans—not just the Junker aristocracy—more loyal to state and Emperor.[6] He created the modern welfare state in Germany in the 1880s.[167] According to scholars, his strategy was: granting social rights to enhance the integration of a hierarchical society, to forge a bond between workers and the state so as to strengthen the latter, to maintain traditional relations of authority between social and status groups, and to provide a countervailing power against the modernist forces of liberalism and socialism.[168]

Bismarck also enacted universal manhood suffrage in the new German Empire in 1871.[169] He became a great hero to German conservatives, who erected many monuments to his memory after he left office in 1890.[170]

During the interwar period—after Germany’s defeat in World War I, the abdication of Emperor Wilhelm II, and the introduction of parliamentary democracy—German conservatives experienced a cultural crisis and felt uprooted by a progressively modernist world.[171] This angst was expressed philosophically in the Conservative Revolution movement with prominent exponents such as historian Oswald Spengler, jurist Carl Schmitt, and author Ernst Jünger.[172] The major conservative party of this era was the reactionary German National People’s Party, who advocated a restored monarchy.[173]

With the rise of Nazism in 1933, traditional agrarian movements faded and were supplanted by a more command-based economy and forced social integration. Adolf Hitler succeeded in garnering the support of many German industrialists; but prominent traditionalists, including military officers Claus von Stauffenberg and Henning von Tresckow, pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Bishop Clemens August Graf von Galen, and monarchist Carl Friedrich Goerdeler, openly and secretly opposed his policies of euthanasia, genocide, and attacks on organized religion.[174]

More recently, the work of conservative Christian Democratic Union leader and Chancellor Helmut Kohl helped bring about German reunification, along with the closer European integration in the form of the Maastricht Treaty. Today, German conservatism is often associated with politicians such as Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose tenure was marked by attempts to save the common European currency (Euro) from demise. The German conservatives were divided under Merkel due to the refugee crisis in Germany, and many conservatives in the CDU/CSU opposed the immigration policies developed under Merkel.[175] The 2020s also saw the rise of the right-wing populist Alternative for Germany.

Greece[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Greece

Principles

Authority

Christian values

Family values

Greek nationalism

Metaxism

Monarchism

Private property

Social market economy

Social order

Protectionism

Tradition

Intellectuals

Elytis

Tsatsos

Vlachos

Politicians

Averoff

Dragoumis

Gounaris

Kalogeropoulos

Kanellopoulos

Karamanlis

Kapodistrias

Koumoundouros

Metaxas

Papagos

Protopapadakis

Rallis (Dimitrios)

Rallis (Georgios)

Samaras

Stefanopoulos

Stephanopoulos

Tsaldari

Tsaldaris (Konstantinos)

Tsaldaris (Panagis)

Tsatsos

PartiesActive

Democratic Revival

Greek Solution

Independent Greeks

National Hope

National Unity Association

New Democracy

Popular Orthodox Rally

Defunct

Democratic Renewal

Freethinkers' Party

Greek Rally

Napist Party

National Radical Union

People's Party

Political Spring

Popular Social Party

Union of Populars

Organisations

Panhellenic Liberation Organization

Media

Estia

Kathimerini

History

4th of August Regime

Greek Civil War

Greek economic miracle

Greek language question

Greek monarchy referendum, 1935

Greek referendum, 1946

Greek Resistance

Leonardopoulos–Gargalidis coup d'état attempt

Metapolitefsi

National Schism

 Conservatism portal

 Greece portalvte

The main inter-war conservative party was called the People's Party (PP), which supported constitutional monarchy and opposed the republican Liberal Party. Both parties were suppressed by the authoritarian, arch-conservative, and royalist 4th of August Regime of Ioannis Metaxas in 1936–1941. The PP was able to re-group after the Second World War as part of a United Nationalist Front which achieved power campaigning on a simple anti-communist, nationalist platform during the Greek Civil War (1946–1949). However, the vote received by the PP declined during the so-called "Centrist Interlude" in 1950–1952.

In 1952, Marshal Alexandros Papagos created the Greek Rally as an umbrella for the right-wing forces. The Greek Rally came to power in 1952 and remained the leading party in Greece until 1963. After Papagos' death in 1955, it was reformed as the National Radical Union under Konstantinos Karamanlis. Right-wing governments backed by the palace and the army overthrew the Centre Union government in 1965 and governed the country until the establishment of the far-right Greek junta (1967–1974). After the regime's collapse in August 1974, Karamanlis returned from exile to lead the government and founded the New Democracy party. The new conservative party had four objectives: to confront Turkish expansionism in Cyprus, to reestablish and solidify democratic rule, to give the country a strong government, and to make a powerful moderate party a force in Greek politics.[176]

The Independent Greeks, a newly formed political party in Greece, has also supported conservatism, particularly national and religious conservatism. The Founding Declaration of the Independent Greeks strongly emphasises in the preservation of the Greek state and its sovereignty, the Greek people, and the Greek Orthodox Church.[177]

Iceland[edit]

Founded in 1924 as the Conservative Party, Iceland's Independence Party adopted its current name in 1929 after the merger with the Liberal Party. From the beginning, they have been the largest vote-winning party, averaging around 40%. They combined liberalism and conservatism, supported nationalization of infrastructure, and advocated class collaboration. While mostly in opposition during the 1930s, they embraced economic liberalism, but accepted the welfare state after the war and participated in governments supportive of state intervention and protectionism. Unlike other Scandanivian conservative (and liberal) parties, it has always had a large working-class following.[178] After the financial crisis in 2008, the party has sunk to a lower support level at around 20–25%.

Italy[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Italy

Ideologies

Berlusconism

Historical Right

Italian nationalism

Italian school of elitism

Liberal conservatism

Liberismo

Populism

Sanfedismo

Principles

Agrarianism

Anti-communism

Catholic social teaching

Christian democracy

Christian values

Clericalism

Familialism

Maternalism

Monarchism

Patriotism

Political Catholicism

Property rights

Subsidiarity

Ultramontanism

Intellectuals

Bresciani

Cuoco

Evola

Giubilei

Leopardi

Longanesi

Maistre

Margotti

Montanelli

Mosca

Papini

Pareto

Pera

Salandra

Sogno

Taparelli

Politicians

Andreotti

Berlusconi

De Gasperi

Fini

Meloni

Pera

Salandra

Salvini

Sogno

Tatarella

PartiesActive

Brothers of Italy

Coraggio Italia

Future and Freedom

 Identity and Action

Lega

Monarchist Alliance

Lega Nord

Us with Italy

Defunct

Common Man's Front

Conservatives and Reformists

Direction Italy

Forza Italia

Italian Democratic Party of Monarchist Unity

Italian Nationalist Association

Liberal Constitutional Party

Monarchist National Party

New Centre-Right

The People of Freedom

People's Monarchist Party

Organisations

Machiavelli Center for Political and Strategic Studies

Media

Annabella

L'Armonia

Il Borghese

Candido

Corriere della Sera (formerly)

Epoca

Il Foglio

Il Giornale

L'Italia settimanale

Libero

La Verità

Related topics

1946 Italian institutional referendum

Italian fascism

Kingdom of Italy

Revolt Against the Modern World

 Conservatism portal

 Italy portalvte

After unification, Italy was governed successively by the Historical Right, which represented conservative, liberal-conservative, and conservative-liberal positions, and the Historical Left.

After World War I, the country saw the emergence of its first mass parties, notably including the Italian People's Party (PPI), a Christian-democratic party that sought to represent the Catholic majority, which had long refrained from politics. The PPI and the Italian Socialist Party decisively contributed to the loss of strength and authority of the old liberal ruling class, which had not been able to structure itself into a proper party: the Liberal Union was not coherent and the Italian Liberal Party came too late.

In 1921, Benito Mussolini founded the National Fascist Party (PNF), and the next year, through the March on Rome, he was appointed Prime Minister by King Victor Emmanuel III. Fascism originated as a populist, revolutionary, anti-royalist, anti-clerical, and anti-conservative ideology, initially viewed by many socialists as a leftist heresy rather than a rightist opponent; but it became distinctly right-wing when it made compromises with the conservative establishment in order to consolidate authority and suppress communist movements.[179][180] In 1926, all parties were dissolved except the PNF, which thus remained the only legal party in the Kingdom of Italy until the fall of the regime in July 1943. By 1945, fascists were discredited, disbanded, and outlawed, while Mussolini was executed in April that year.[181]

In 1946, a referendum was held concerning the fate of the monarchy. While southern Italy and parts of northern Italy were royalist, other parts, especially in central Italy, were predominantly republican. The outcome was 54–46% in favour of a republic, leading to a collapse of the monarchy.[182]

After World War II, the centre-right was dominated by the centrist party Christian Democracy (DC), which included both conservative and centre-left elements. With its landslide victory over the Italian Socialist Party and the Italian Communist Party in 1948, the political centre was in power. In Denis Mack Smith's words, it was "moderately conservative, reasonably tolerant of everything which did not touch religion or property, but above all Catholic and sometimes clerical". It dominated politics until DC's dissolution in 1994.[183][184] Among DC's frequent allies, there was the conservative-liberal Italian Liberal Party. At the right of the DC stood parties like the royalist Monarchist National Party and the post-fascist Italian Social Movement.

In 1994, entrepreneur and media tycoon Silvio Berlusconi founded the liberal-conservative party Forza Italia (FI). He won three elections in 1994, 2001, and 2008, governing the country for almost ten years as Prime Minister. FI formed a coalitions with several parties, including the national-conservative National Alliance (AN), heir of the MSI, and the regionalist Lega Nord (LN). FI was briefly incorporated, along with AN, in The People of Freedom party and later revived in the new Forza Italia.[185] After the 2018 general election, the LN and the Five Star Movement formed a populist government, which lasted about a year.[186] In the 2022 general election, a centre-right coalition came to power, this time dominated by Brothers of Italy (FdI), a new national-conservative party born on the ashes of AN. Consequently, FdI, the re-branded Lega, and FI formed a government under FdI leader Giorgia Meloni.

Luxembourg[edit]

Luxembourg's major conservative party, the Christian Social People's Party, was formed as the Party of the Right in 1914 and adopted its present name in 1945. It was consistently the largest political party in Luxembourg and dominated politics throughout the 20th century.[187]

Netherlands[edit]

Liberalism has been strong in the Netherlands. Thus, rightist parties are often liberal-conservative or conservative-liberal. One example of this is the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy. Even the right-wing populist Party for Freedom, which dominated the 2023 election, supports liberal positions such as women's and gay rights, abortion, and euthanasia.[188]

Norway[edit]

The Conservative Party of Norway (Norwegian: Høyre, literally "Right") was formed by the old upper-class of state officials and wealthy merchants to fight the populist democracy of the Liberal Party, but it lost power in 1884, when parliamentarian government was first practiced. It formed its first government under parliamentarism in 1889 and continued to alternate in power with the Liberals until the 1930s, when Labour became the dominant party. It has elements both of paternalism, stressing the responsibilities of the state, and of economic liberalism. It first returned to power in the 1960s.[189] During Kåre Willoch's premiership in the 1980s, much emphasis was laid on liberalizing the credit and housing market and abolishing the NRK TV and radio monopoly, while supporting law and order in criminal justice and traditional norms in education.[190]

Russia[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Russia

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Russia

Ideologies

Eurasianism

Duginism

Monarchism

Black-hundredism

Tsarism

Populism

Putinism

Russian nationalism

All-Russian

Christian

Slavophilia

Pochvennichestvo

Principles

Authority

Autocracy

Duty

Economic interventionism

Family values

Imperialism

Irredentism

Law and order

Orthodox values

Nuclear Orthodoxy

 Patriotism

Reactionism

Social hierarchy

Social order

Sovereign democracy

Statism

Traditionalism

Ultranationalism

Intellectuals

Aksakov

Dostoevsky

Dugin

Frank

Ilyin

Karamzin

Katkov

Leontiev

Pobedonostsev

Prokhanov

Rozanov

Semyonov

Shafarevich

Shcherbatov

Solzhenitsyn

Strakhov

Surkov

Tikhomirov

Tikhon

Uvarov

Vikulov

Zhukovsky

Politicians

Alexander III

Butina

Dubrovin

Durnovo

Gryzlov

Kolchak

Kornilov

Luzhkov

Malyshkin

Mizulina

Nicholas I

Nicholas II

Pikhno

Pobedonostsev

Putin

Rodzianko

Rogozin

Rostopchin

Shulgin

Slutsky

Surkov

Tolstoy

von Ungern

Uvarov

Vladimir

Volodin

Zhirinovsky

PartiesActive

Eurasia Party

Great Russia

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia

Rodina

Russian All-People's Union

Union of Right Forces

United Russia

Defunct

For Truth

Liberal Democratic Party of the Soviet Union

People's Union

Pamyat Society

Union of the Russian People

Organisations

All-Russia People's Front

Izborsky Club

Media

Kievlyanin

Kozma Minin

Nash Sovremennik

Russkoye Znamya

Zavtra

Znamya

Related topics

Culture of Russia

Great Russia

Neo-Sovietism

Nostalgia for the Soviet Union

Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality

Russia for Russians

Russia under Vladimir Putin

White movement

 Conservatism portal

 Russia portalvte

Under Vladimir Putin, the dominant leader since 1999, Russia has promoted explicitly conservative policies in social, cultural, and political matters, both at home and abroad.[191] Putin has criticized globalism and economic liberalism, claiming that "liberalism has become obsolete" and that the vast majority of people in the world oppose multiculturalism, free immigration, and rights for LGBT people.[192] Russian conservatism is special in some respects as it supports a mixed economy with economic intervention, combined with a strong nationalist sentiment and social conservatism which is largely populist. As a result, Russian conservatism opposes right-libertarian ideals such as the aforementioned concept of economic liberalism found in other conservative movements around the world.

Putin has also promoted new think tanks that bring together like-minded intellectuals and writers. For example, the Izborsky Club, founded in 2012 by Alexander Prokhanov, stresses Russian nationalism, the restoration of Russia's historical greatness, and systematic opposition to liberal ideas and policies.[193] Vladislav Surkov, a senior government official, has been one of the key ideologues during Putin's presidency.[194]

In cultural and social affairs, Putin has collaborated closely with the Russian Orthodox Church. Under Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, the Church has backed the expansion of Russian power into Crimea and eastern Ukraine.[195] More broadly, The New York Times reports in September 2016 how the Church's policy prescriptions support the Kremlin's appeal to social conservatives:

"A fervent foe of homosexuality and any attempt to put individual rights above those of family, community, or nation, the Russian Orthodox Church helps project Russia as the natural ally of all those who pine for a more secure, illiberal world free from the tradition-crushing rush of globalization, multiculturalism, and women's and gay rights."[196]

Sweden[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Sweden

Principles

Duty

Elitism

Meritocracy

Law and order

Liberal conservatism

Ordered liberty

Moderate conservatism

Monarchism

National conservatism

Folkhemmet

National romanticism

Patriotism

Property rights

Rule of law

Social order

State church

Tradition

Intellectuals

Ahlberg

Arnstberg

Boström

Böök

Geijer

Heckscher (Eli)

Heckscher (Gunnar)

Heberlein

Heidenstam

Hjärne

Karlsson

Kjellén

Martinsson

Nordin

Lindbom

Pethrus

Ryn

Stolpe

Tegnér

Teodorescu

Zetterberg

Politicians

Bildt

Bohman

Busch

Hägglund

Järta

Karlsson

Kasselstrand

Kjellén

Krönmark

Lindman

Lundeberg

Pethrus

Trygger

Wallmark

Weimers

Åkesson

PartiesContemporary

Alternative for Sweden

Christian Democrats

Citizens' Coalition

Moderate Party

Sweden Democrats

Former

Centre Party

Lantmanna Party

National Party

New Democracy

Protectionist Party

Organisations

Captus

 Jarl Hjalmarson Foundation

Oikos

Young Christian Democrats

Young Swedes SDU

MediaActive

Axess magasin

Barometern

Bulletin

Det Bästa

Gotlands Allehanda

Nya Wermlands-Tidningen

Nyheter Idag

Riks

Smålandsposten

Svenska Dagbladet

Former

Det Nya Sverige

Nya Dagligt Allehanda

OBS!

Salt

Stockholms Dagblad

History

Hats

Peasant armament support march

Courtyard Speech

Swedish Empire

Swedish Romanticism

Gothicism

Related topics

Swedish Bible Belt

Kristersson cabinet

Tidö Agreement

 Conservatism portal

 Sweden portalvte

In the early 19th century, Swedish conservatism developed alongside Swedish Romanticism. The historian Erik Gustaf Geijer, an exponent of Gothicism, glorified the Viking Age and the Swedish Empire,[197] and the idealist philosopher Christopher Jacob Boström became the chief ideologue of the official state doctrine, which dominated Swedish politics for almost a century.[198] Other influential Swedish conservative Romantics were Esaias Tegnér and Per Daniel Amadeus Atterbom.

Early parliamentary conservatism in Sweden was explicitly elitist. Indeed, the Conservative Party was formed in 1904 with one major goal in mind: to stop the advent of universal suffrage, which they feared would result in socialism. Yet, it was a Swedish admiral, the conservative politician Arvid Lindman, who first extended democracy by enacting male suffrage, despite the protests of more traditionalist voices, such as the later Prime Minister, the arch-conservative and authoritarian statesman Ernst Trygger, who railed at progressive policies such as the abolition of the death penalty.[199]

Once a democratic system was in place, Swedish conservatives sought to combine traditional elitism with modern populism. Sweden’s most renowned political scientist, the conservative politician Rudolf Kjellén, coined the terms geopolitics and biopolitics in relation to his organic theory of the state.[200] He also developed the corporatist-nationalist concept of Folkhemmet (’the home of the people’), which became the single most powerful political concept in Sweden throughout the 20th century, although it was adopted by the Social Democratic Party who gave it a more socialist interpretation.[201]

After a brief grand coalition between Left and Right during World War II, the centre-right parties struggled to cooperate due to their ideological differences: the agrarian populism of the Centre Party, the urban liberalism of the Liberal People’s Party, and the liberal-conservative elitism of the Moderate Party (the old Conservative Party). However, in 1976 and in 1979, the three parties managed to form a government under Thorbjörn Fälldin—and again in 1991, this time under aristocrat Carl Bildt and with support from the newly founded Christian Democrats, the most conservative party in contemporary Sweden.[202]

In modern times, mass immigration from distant cultures caused a large populist dissatisfaction, which was not channeled through any of the established parties, who generally espoused multiculturalism.[203] Instead, the 2010s saw the rise of the right-wing populist Sweden Democrats, who were surging as the largest party in the polls on several occasions.[204][205] The party was ostracized by the other parties until 2019, when Christian Democrat leader Ebba Busch reached out for collaboration, after which the Moderate Party followed suit.[206] In 2022, the centre-right parties formed a government with support from the Sweden Democrats as the biggest party.[207] The subsequent Tidö Agreement, negotiated in Tidö Castle, incorporated authoritarian policies such as a stricter stance on immigration and a harsher stance on law and order.[208]

Switzerland[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Switzerland

Principles

Agrarianism

Capitalism

Economic liberalism

Federalism

Liberty

Limited government

Multiculturalism

Populism

Property rights

Republicanism

Subsidiarity

Swiss neutrality

Intellectuals

Burckhardt

von Haller

Mohler

Schuon

Politicians

Blocher

Furgler

Gnägi

Maurer

von Moos

Widmer-Schlumpf

Parties

Christian Democratic People's Party of Switzerland

Conservative Democratic Party of Switzerland

Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland

Federal Democratic Union of Switzerland

Freedom Party of Switzerland

Party of Farmers, Traders and Independents

Swiss People's Party

Organisations

AUNS

Pro Libertate

Media

Die Weltwoche

Neue Zürcher Zeitung

Related topics

Culture of Switzerland

Far-right politics in Switzerland

Politics of Switzerland

 Conservatism portal

 Switzerland portalvte

In some aspects, Swiss conservatism is unique, as Switzerland is an old federal republic born from historically sovereign cantons, comprising three major nationalities, and adhering to the principle of Swiss neutrality.

There are a number of conservative parties in Switzerland's parliament, the Federal Assembly. These include the largest ones: the Swiss People's Party (SVP),[209] the Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP),[210] and the Conservative Democratic Party of Switzerland (BDP),[211] which is a splinter of the SVP created in the aftermath to the election of Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf as Federal Council.[211]

The SVP was formed from the 1971 merger of the Party of Farmers, Traders and Citizens, formed in 1917, and the smaller Democratic Party, formed in 1942. The SVP emphasized agricultural policy and was strong among farmers in German-speaking Protestant areas. As Switzerland considered closer relations with the European Union in the 1990s, the SVP adopted a more militant protectionist and isolationist stance. This stance has allowed it to expand into German-speaking Catholic mountainous areas.[212] The Anti-Defamation League, a non-Swiss lobby group based in the United States has accused them of manipulating issues such as immigration, Swiss neutrality, and welfare benefits, awakening antisemitism and racism.[213] The Council of Europe has called the SVP "extreme right", although some scholars dispute this classification. For instance, Hans-Georg Betz describes it as "populist radical right".[214] The SVP has been the largest party since 2003.

Ukraine[edit]

The authoritarian Ukrainian State was headed by Cossack aristocrat Pavlo Skoropadskyi and represented the conservative movement. The 1918 Hetman government, which appealed to the tradition of the 17th–18th century Cossack Hetman state, represented the conservative strand in Ukraine's struggle for independence. It had the support of the proprietary classes and of conservative and moderate political groups. Vyacheslav Lypynsky was a main ideologue of Ukrainian conservatism.[215]

United Kingdom[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in the United Kingdom

This article is part of a series onConservatismin the United Kingdom

Ideologies

British nationalism

Cameronism

Muscular liberalism

Civic

Compassionate

Green

Neo

One-nation

Powellism

Progressive

Liberal

Thatcherism

Toryism

High

Red

Social

Ultra

Principles

British unionism

Classical liberalism

Elitism

Aristocracy

Meritocracy

Noblesse oblige

Family values

Imperialism

Loyalism

Moral absolutism

Protectionism

Royalism

Social hierarchy

Social market economy

Sovereignty

State church

Tradition

Intellectuals

Belloc

Burke

Carlyle

Chesterton

Coleridge

Dalrymple

Dawson

Cowling

Eliot

Ferguson

Hayek

Hitchens

Hume

Johnson (Paul)

Johnson (Samuel)

Joseph

Kipling

Lewis

More

Murray

Newman

Oakeshott

Roberts

Ruskin

Scott

Scruton

Southey

Sullivan

Tolkien

Waugh

Wordsworth

Worsthorne

Works

A Vindication of Natural Society (1756)

Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

"Tamworth Manifesto" (1834)

Coningsby (1844)

Sybil (1845)

Orthodoxy (1908)

"Tradition and the Individual Talent" (1919)

The Abolition of Man (1943)

The Left Was Never Right (1945)

Our Culture, What's Left of It (2005)

The Rage Against God (2010)

The Great Degeneration (2013)

How to Be a Conservative (2014)

Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition (2017)

Politicians

Baldwin

Balfour

Braverman

Burke

Cameron

Canning

Churchill

Disraeli

Gove

Hannan

Hayes

Hogg

Johnson

Joseph

Leigh

Macmillan

May

Peel

Pitt

Powell

Rees-Mogg

Salisbury

Thatcher

Willetts

Parties

Alliance EPP: European People's Party UK

Christian Party

Christian Peoples Alliance

Conservative and Unionist Party

Democratic Unionist Party

For Britain Movement

Heritage Party

Traditional Unionist Voice

Tories

UK Independence Party

Ulster Unionist Party

Veterans and People's Party

Organisations

Bright Blue

Blue Collar Conservativism

Cornerstone Group

One Nation Conservatives

Orange Order

Tory Reform Group

Traditional Britain Group

Media

Daily Express

Sunday Express

Daily Mail

The Daily Telegraph

Evening Standard

GB News

The Mail on Sunday

The Salisbury Review

The Spectator

The Sun

The Sun on Sunday

The Sunday Telegraph

The Sunday Times

TalkTV

The Times

Related topics

Anglo-Catholicism

Blue Labour

Brexit

Politics of the United Kingdom

Liberalism

Socialism

Young England

 Conservatism portal

 United Kingdom portalvte

Part of the Politics series onToryism

Characteristics

Agrarianism

Classicism

Counterrevolution

High Church (Anglicanism)

High culture

Interventionism

Loyalism

Monarchism

Noblesse oblige

Traditionalism

Traditional Catholicism

Royalism

Unionism

General topics

Cavaliers

Cavalier Parliament

Château Clique

Conservative corporatism

Divine right of kings

Family Compact

Jacobitism

Oxford Movement

Powellism

People

Robert Filmer

1st Earl of Clarendon

Roger L'Estrange

1st Earl of Rochester

1st Viscount Bolingbroke

Samuel Johnson

3rd Earl of Bute

1st Duke of Wellington

Walter Scott

Stanley Baldwin

G. K. Chesterton

Winston Churchill

Enoch Powell

George Grant

Related topics

Carlism

Chouans

Cristeros

Conservatism

Distributism

High Tory

Legitimism

Loyalism

Miguelism

Pink Tory

Reactionary

Red Tory

Spanish American royalism

Sanfedismo

Tory socialism

Traditionalist conservatism

Ultra-Tories

Vendéens

Viva Maria

Veronese Easter

vte

Modern English conservatives celebrate Anglo-Irish statesman Edmund Burke as their intellectual father. Burke was affiliated with the Whig Party, which eventually split amongst the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party, but the modern Conservative Party is generally thought to derive primarily from the Tories, and the MPs of the modern conservative party are still frequently referred to as Tories.[216]

Shortly after Burke's death in 1797, conservatism was revived as a mainstream political force as the Whigs suffered a series of internal divisions. This new generation of conservatives derived their politics not from Burke, but from his predecessor, the Viscount Bolingbroke (1678–1751), who was a Jacobite and traditional Tory, lacking Burke's sympathies for Whiggish policies such as Catholic emancipation and American independence (famously attacked by Samuel Johnson in "Taxation No Tyranny").[216]

In the first half of the 19th century, many newspapers, magazines, and journals promoted loyalist or right-wing attitudes in religion, politics, and international affairs. Burke was seldom mentioned, but William Pitt the Younger (1759–1806) became a conspicuous hero. The most prominent journals included The Quarterly Review, founded in 1809 as a counterweight to the Whigs' Edinburgh Review, and the even more conservative Blackwood's Magazine. The Quarterly Review promoted a balanced Canningite Toryism, as it was neutral on Catholic emancipation and only mildly critical of Nonconformist dissent; it opposed slavery and supported the current poor laws; and it was "aggressively imperialist". The high-church clergy of the Church of England read the Orthodox Churchman's Magazine, which was equally hostile to Jewish, Catholic, Jacobin, Methodist and Unitarian spokesmen. Anchoring the ultra-Tories, Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine stood firmly against Catholic emancipation and favoured slavery, cheap money, mercantilism, the Navigation Acts, and the Holy Alliance.[216]

Conservatism evolved after 1820, embracing free trade in 1846 and a commitment to democracy, especially under Benjamin Disraeli. The effect was to significantly strengthen conservatism as a grassroots political force. Conservatism no longer was the philosophical defense of the landed aristocracy, but had been refreshed into redefining its commitment to the ideals of order, both secular and religious, expanding imperialism, strengthened monarchy, and a more generous vision of the welfare state as opposed to the punitive vision of the Whigs and liberals.[217] As early as 1835, Disraeli attacked the Whigs and utilitarians as slavishly devoted to an industrial oligarchy, while he described his fellow Tories as the only "really democratic party of England", devoted to the interests of the whole people.[218] Nevertheless, inside the party there was a tension between the growing numbers of wealthy businessmen on the one side and the aristocracy and rural gentry on the other.[219] The aristocracy gained strength as businessmen discovered they could use their wealth to buy a peerage and a country estate.

Some conservatives lamented the passing of a pastoral world where the ethos of noblesse oblige had promoted respect from the lower classes. They saw the Anglican Church and the aristocracy as balances against commercial wealth.[220] They worked toward legislation for improved working conditions and urban housing.[221] This viewpoint would later be called Tory democracy.[222] However, since Burke, there has always been tension between traditional aristocratic conservatism and the wealthy liberal business class.[223]

In 1834, Tory Prime Minister Robert Peel issued the "Tamworth Manifesto", in which he pledged to endorse moderate political reform. This marked the beginning of the transformation from High Tory reactionism towards a more modern form of conservatism. As a result, the party became known as the Conservative Party—a name it has retained to this day. However, Peel would also be the root of a split in the party between the traditional Tories (by the Earl of Derby and Benjamin Disraeli) and the "Peelites" (led first by Peel himself, then by the Earl of Aberdeen). The split occurred in 1846 over the issue of free trade, which Peel supported, versus protectionism, supported by Derby. The majority of the party sided with Derby whilst about a third split away, eventually merging with the Whigs and the radicals to form the Liberal Party. Despite the split, the mainstream Conservative Party accepted the doctrine of free trade in 1852.

In the second half of the 19th century, the Liberal Party faced political schisms, especially over Irish Home Rule. Leader William Gladstone (himself a former Peelite) sought to give Ireland a degree of autonomy, a move that elements in both the left and right-wings of his party opposed. These split off to become the Liberal Unionists (led by Joseph Chamberlain), forming a coalition with the Conservatives before merging with them in 1912. The Liberal Unionist influence dragged the Conservative Party towards the left as Conservative governments passed a number of progressive reforms at the turn of the 20th century. By the late 19th century, the traditional business supporters of the Liberal Party had joined the Conservatives, making them the party of business and commerce as well.

After a period of Liberal dominance before the First World War, the Conservatives gradually became more influential in government, regaining full control of the cabinet in 1922. In the inter-war period, conservatism was the major ideology in Britain[224][225][226] as the Liberal Party vied with the Labour Party for control of the left. After the Second World War, the first Labour government (1945–1951) under Clement Attlee embarked on a program of nationalization of industry and the promotion of social welfare. The Conservatives generally accepted those policies until the 1980s.

In the 1980s, the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher, guided by neoliberal economics, reversed many of Labour's social programmes, privatised large parts of the UK economy, and sold state-owned assets.[227] The Conservative Party also adopted soft eurosceptic politics and opposed Federal Europe. Other conservative political parties, such as the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP, founded in 1971), and the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP, founded in 1993), began to appear, although they have yet to make any significant impact at Westminster. As of 2014, the DUP is the largest political party in the ruling coalition in the Northern Ireland Assembly), and from 2017–2019 the DUP provided support for the Conservative minority government under a confidence-and-supply arrangement.

Latin America[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Latin America

Conservative elites have long dominated Latin American nations. Mostly, this has been achieved through control of civil institutions, the Catholic Church, and the military, rather than through party politics. Typically, the Church was exempt from taxes and its employees immune from civil prosecution. Where conservative parties were weak or non-existent, conservatives were more likely to rely on military dictatorship as a preferred form of government.

However, in some nations where the elites were able to mobilize popular support for conservative parties, longer periods of political stability were achieved. Chile, Colombia, and Venezuela are examples of nations that developed strong conservative parties. Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador, and Peru are examples of nations where this did not occur.[228]

Louis Hartz explained conservatism in Latin American nations as a result of their settlement as feudal societies.[229]

Brazil[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Brazil

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Brazil

Ideologies

Bolsonarism

Coronelism

Integralism

Janismo

Monarchism

Patrianovism

Nationalism

Populism

Principles

Agrarianism

Anti-communism

Authority

Catholicism

Family values

Federalism

Gun rights

Law and order

Militarism

Patriotism

Traditionalism

Intellectuals

Campos

Carpeaux

Carvalho

Corção

Corrêa de Oliveira

Francis

Freyre

Lacombe

Léo

Mourão

Oliveira Lima

Oliveira Torres

Paulo Ricardo

Pinto

Reale

Rodríguez

dos Santos

Silva

Simonsen

Tolentino

Politicians

Andrada e Silva

Araújo Lima

Bolsonaro

Carneiro

Ferreira

Fidelix

Lacerda

Maluf

Nabuco

dos Santos

Winter

Zambelli

PartiesActive

Brazil Union

Brazilian Labour Renewal Party

Brazilian Woman's Party

Christian Democracy

Democratic Renewal Party

Liberal Party

Progressistas

Republicans

Defunct

Alliance for Brazil

Brazilian Integralist Action

Brazilian Labour Party

Conservative Party

Conservative Republican Party

Democratic Social Party

Democrats

Fluminense Republican Party

National Democratic Union

Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order

Patriota

Popular Representation Party

Social Christian Party

Social Liberal Party

Organisations

Evangelical Caucus

União Democrática Ruralista

Media

Gazeta do Povo

O Tempo

Related topics

BBB Bench

Bolsominion

Brazil above everything, God above everyone

Colonial Brazil

Empire of Brazil

Free Brazil Movement

Military dictatorship in Brazil

 Conservatism portal

 Brazil portalvte

Conservatism in Brazil originates from the cultural and historical tradition of Brazil, whose cultural roots are Luso-Iberian and Roman Catholic.[230] More traditional conservative historical views and features include belief in political federalism and monarchism.

The military dictatorship in Brazil was established on 1 April 1964, after a coup d'état by the Brazilian Army with support from the United States government, and it lasted for 21 years, until 15 March 1985. The coup received support from almost all high-ranking members of the military along with conservative sectors in society, such as the Catholic Church and anti-communist civilian movements among the Brazilian middle and upper classes. The dictatorship reached the height of its popularity in the 1970s with the so-called Brazilian Miracle. Brazil's military government provided a model for other military regimes throughout Latin America, being systematized by the "National Security Doctrine", which was used to justify the military's actions as operating in the interest of national security in a time of crisis.[231]

In contemporary politics, a conservative wave began roughly around the 2014 Brazilian presidential election.[232] According to commentators, the National Congress of Brazil elected in 2014 may be considered the most conservative since the re-democratization movement, citing an increase in the number of parliamentarians linked to more conservative segments, such as ruralists, the military, the police, and religious conservatives. The subsequent economic crisis of 2015 and investigations of corruption scandals led to a right-wing movement that sought to rescue ideas from economic liberalism and conservatism in opposition to socialism. At the same time, fiscal conservatives such as those that make up the Free Brazil Movement emerged among many others. National-conservative candidate Jair Bolsonaro of the Social Liberal Party was the winner of the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.[233]

Chile[edit]

Chile's conservative party, the National Party, disbanded in 1973 following a military coup and did not re-emerge as a political force after the return to democracy.[234] During the military dictatorship of Chile, the country was ruled by a military junta headed by General Augusto Pinochet. His ideology, known as Pinochetism, was anti-communist, militaristic, nationalistic, and laissez-faire capitalistic.[235] Under Pinochet, Chile's economy was placed under the control of a group of economists known collectively as the Chicago Boys, whose liberalising policies have been described as neoliberal.[236]

Colombia[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Colombia

The Colombian Conservative Party, founded in 1849, traces its origins to opponents of General Francisco de Paula Santander's 1833–1837 administration. While the term "liberal" had been used to describe all political forces in Colombia, the conservatives began describing themselves as "conservative liberals" and their opponents as "red liberals". From the 1860s until the present, the party has supported strong central government and the Catholic Church, especially its role as protector of the sanctity of the family, and opposed separation of church and state. Its policies include the legal equality of all men, the citizen's right to own property, and opposition to dictatorship. It has usually been Colombia's second largest party, with the Colombian Liberal Party being the largest.[237]

North America[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in North America

Canada[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Canada

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Canada

Schools

Clerico-nationalism

Right-wing populism

Trumpism

Social conservatism

Social credit

Toryism

Blue

Red

Principles

Canadian values

Federalism

Economic liberalism

Limited government

Loyalism

Monarchism

Nationalism

Property rights

Protectionism

Rule of law

Tradition

Intellectuals

Black

Byfield

Farthing

Flanagan

Granatstein

Grant

Groulx

Peterson

Politicians

Bennett

Borden

Diefenbaker

Duplessis

Harper

Harris

Klein

Lougheed

Macdonald

Manning

Mulroney

Commentators

Camp

Jivani

Levant

Segal

Speer

Steyn

Extant partiesFederal

Christian Heritage Party of Canada

Conservative Party of Canada

Libertarian Party of Canada

Provincial

British Columbia United

Coalition Avenir Québec

Conservative Party of British Columbia

Conservative Party of Quebec

Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba

Progressive Conservative Party of NB

Progressive Conservative Party of NL

Progressive Conservative Party of Nova Scotia

Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario

Progressive Conservative Party of PEI

Progressive Conservative Party of Sask.

Saskatchewan Party

United Conservative Party

Yukon Party

Historical partiesFederal

Canadian Alliance

Conservative Party of Canada (1867–1942)

Liberal-Conservative Party

Progressive Conservative Party of Canada

Reform Party of Canada

Social Credit Party of Canada

Unionist Party

Provincial

Action démocratique du Québec

British Columbia Social Credit Party

Conservative Party of Quebec (historical)

Parti bleu

Progressive Conservative Assoc. of Alberta

Union Nationale

Upper Canada Tories

Wildrose Party

Media

CFRA

Free Dominion

LifeSiteNews

National Post

The Post Millennial

Rebel News

Sun News Network

Toronto Sun

Western Standard

Winnipeg Sun

Other organizations

Campaign Life Coalition

Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform

Canadian Coalition for Democracies

Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Catholic Civil Rights League

Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy

Focus on the Family Canada

Fraser Institute

LGBTory

Mackenzie Institute

Montreal Economic Institute

National Citizens Coalition

Progressive Group for Independent Business

REAL Women of Canada

Voice of Canadians

Related

Calgary School

Château Clique

Common Sense Revolution

Conservatism in the United Kingdom

Family Compact

Harperism

Lament for a Nation

National Policy

Orange Order

Unite the Right

United Empire Loyalist

Upper Canada Tories

Western alienation

Alberta Agenda

Alberta separatism

 Canada portal

 Conservatism portalvte

Canada's conservatives had their roots in the Tory loyalists who left America after the American Revolution.[238] They developed in the socio-economic and political cleavages that existed during the first three decades of the 19th century and had the support of the mercantile, professional, and religious elites in Ontario and to a lesser extent in Quebec. Holding a monopoly over administrative and judicial offices, they were called the Family Compact in Ontario and the Chateau Clique in Quebec. John A. Macdonald's successful leadership of the movement to confederate the provinces and his subsequent tenure as prime minister for most of the late 19th century rested on his ability to bring together the English-speaking Protestant aristocracy and the ultramontane Catholic hierarchy of Quebec and to keep them united in a conservative coalition.[239]

The conservatives combined pro-market liberalism and Toryism. They generally supported an activist government and state intervention in the marketplace, and their policies were marked by noblesse oblige, a paternalistic responsibility of the elites for the less well-off.[240] The party was known as the Progressive Conservatives from 1942 until 2003, when the party merged with the Canadian Alliance to form the Conservative Party of Canada.[241]

The conservative and autonomist Union Nationale, led by Maurice Duplessis, governed the province of Quebec in periods from 1936 to 1960 and in a close alliance with the Catholic Church, small rural elites, farmers, and business elites. This period, known by liberals as the Great Darkness, ended with the Quiet Revolution and the party went into terminal decline.[242]

By the end of the 1960s, the political debate in Quebec centered around the question of independence, opposing the social democratic and sovereignist Parti Québécois and the centrist and federalist Quebec Liberal Party, therefore marginalizing the conservative movement. Most French Canadian conservatives rallied either the Quebec Liberal Party or the Parti Québécois, while some of them still tried to offer an autonomist third-way with what was left of the Union Nationale or the more populists Ralliement créditiste du Québec and Parti national populaire, but by the 1981 provincial election politically organized conservatism had been obliterated in Quebec. It slowly started to revive at the 1994 provincial election with the Action démocratique du Québec, who served as Official opposition in the National Assembly from 2007 to 2008, before merging in 2012 with François Legault's Coalition Avenir Québec, which took power in 2018. The modern Conservative Party of Canada has rebranded conservatism and, under the leadership of Stephen Harper, added more conservative policies.

Yoram Hazony, a scholar on the history and ideology of conservatism, identified Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson as the most significant conservative thinker to appear in the English-speaking world in a generation.[243]

United States[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in the United States

This article is part of a series onConservatismin the United States

Schools

Compassionate

Fiscal

Fusion

Libertarian

Moderate

Movement

Neo

Paleo

Progressive

Social

Traditionalist

Principles

American exceptionalism

Anti-communism

Christian nationalism

Classical liberalism

Constitutionalism

Family values

Judeo-Christian values

Limited government

Militarism

Moral absolutism

Natural law

Patriotism

Republicanism

Right to bear arms

Rule of law

Tradition

History

Conservative coalition

Conservative Democrat

Conservative Manifesto

Loyalists

McCarthyism

Modern timeline

New Right

Old Right

Overview

Reagan Doctrine

Reaganomics

Stalwart Republicans

Southern Agrarians

Intellectuals

Babbitt

Boorstin

Bozell Jr.

Buchanan

Buckley

Burnham

Chambers

Dolan

Eliot

George

Goldberg

Gottfried

Hanson

Hazony

Hoppe

Jaffa

Kirk

Kirkpatrick

Kreeft

Kristol (Bill)

Kristol (Irving)

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Laffer

Lasch

Lodge

Lovecraft

Lukacs

Mansfield

Meese

Meyer

Nisbet

Nock

Podhoretz

Ransom

Santayana

Sowell

Strauss

Viereck

Voegelin

Washington

Weaver

Will

Politicians

Abbott

Adams

Quincy Adams

Agnew

Buchanan

Bush (George H. W.)

Bush (George W.)

Cantor

Cheney (Dick)

Cheney (Liz)

Clay

Cleveland

Coolidge

Cruz

DeSantis

Dole

Fillmore

Forbes

Gingrich

Goldwater

Graham

Haley

Hamilton

Harding

Hawley

Helms

Hoover

Huckabee

Johnson

Jordan

Lodge

Luce

Massie

McCain

McCarthy (Joseph)

McCarthy (Kevin)

McConnell

McDonald

Meadows

Nixon

Palin

Paul (Rand)

Paul (Ron)

Pence

Quayle

Reagan

Romney

Rubio

Rumsfeld

Ryan

Santorum

Scalise

Scott (Rick)

Scott (Tim)

Sessions

Seymour

Sherman

Taft (Robert)

Taft (William)

Thurmond

Tilden

Trump

Vance

Wolfowitz

Jurists

Alito

Barrett

Bork

Burger

Butler

Colson

Goldsmith

Gorsuch

Harlan II

Kavanaugh

Leo

Meese

Parker

Rehnquist

Scalia

Sessions

Sanford

Sutherland

Van Devanter

Taft

Thomas

Yoo

Commentators

Bannon

Beck

Bartiromo

Bongino

Breitbart

Buchanan

Buckley

Carlson

Coulter

Crowder

D'Souza

Dreher

Drudge

Elder

Grant

Hannity

Hodgetwins

Huckabee

Ingraham

Jones

Kirk

Klavan

Knowles

Krauthammer

Lahren

Levin

Limbaugh

North

Novak

O'Reilly

Owens

Palin

Peterson

Podhoretz

Prager

Robertson

Rubin

Santorum

Schlafly

Shapiro

Tatum

Walsh

Watters

Weyrich

White

Will

Woods

Activists

Bozell III

Dobson

Falwell

Feulner

Gabriel

Graham

Horowitz

Kirk

LaHaye (Beverly)

LaHaye (Tim)

Owens

Park

Prager

Reed

Rufo

Schlafly (Andrew)

Schlafly (Phyllis)

Shapiro

Thiel

Washington

Weyrich

Wurzelbacher

Works

Democracy and Leadership (1924)

Our Enemy, the State (1935)

Ideas Have Consequences (1948)

God and Man at Yale (1951)

The Conservative Mind (1953)

The Conscience of a Conservative (1960)

A Choice Not an Echo (1964)

Roots of American Order (1974)

A Conflict of Visions (1987)

The Closing of the American Mind (1987)

A Republic, Not an Empire (1999)

Hillbilly Elegy (2017)

The Benedict Option (2017)

The Right Side of History (2019)

PartiesActive

American Party

American Independent Party

Conservative Party of New York State

Constitution Party

Reform Party

Republican Party

Defunct

Anti-Masonic Party

Constitutional Union Party

Federalist Party

Law and Order Party of Rhode Island

National Republican Party

Native American Party

Whig Party

Think tanks

Acton Institute

Alexis de Tocqueville Institution

American Enterprise Institute

American Compass

Center for Security Policy

Center for the National Interest

Charles Koch Institute

Claremont Institute

Competitive Enterprise Institute

David Horowitz Freedom Center

Discovery Institute

Ethics and Public Policy Center

Family Research Institute

Gatestone Institute

Heartland Institute

The Heritage Foundation

Hoover Institution

Hudson Institute

Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Leadership Institute

Manhattan Institute

Mises Institute

Pacific Research Institute

Project for the New American Century

Ripon Society

R Street Institute

Rockford Institute

State Policy Network

Tax Foundation

Other organizations

Economics

American Liberty League

Americans for Tax Reform

Club for Growth

Freedom Partners

FreedomWorks

John M. Olin Foundation

National Federation of Independent Business

National Taxpayers Union

Tea Party Patriots

United States Chamber of Commerce

Gun rights

Gun Owners of America

National Rifle Association

Second Amendment Caucus

Identity politics

ACT for America

Concerned Women for America

Council of Conservative Citizens

Independent Women's Forum

Log Cabin Republicans

Nationalism

Federation for American Immigration Reform

Liberty Lobby

NumbersUSA

Oath Keepers

Religion

Alliance Defending Freedom

American Center for Law & Justice

American Family Association

The American TFP

Arlington Group

Chalcedon Foundation

Christian Coalition of America

Christian Voice

Eagle Forum

Family Research Council

The Fellowship

Focus on the Family

Foundation for Moral Law

Liberty Counsel

Moral Majority

National Organization for Marriage

National Right to Life Committee

Parents Television and Media Council

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America

Thomas More Law Center

Traditional Values Coalition

Watchdog groups

Judicial Watch

Media Research Center

Youth/student groups

Turning Point USA

Young America's Foundation

Young Americans for Liberty

Youth for Western Civilization

Miscellaneous

American Conservative Union

The Conservative Caucus

Council for National Policy

Faith and Freedom Coalition

Freedom Caucus

John Birch Society

National Conservative PAC

Philadelphia Society

Republican Study Committee

Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal

Other

ConservAmerica

Federalist Society

Pacific Justice Institute

Regnery Publishing

Republican Main Street Partnership

Media

Newspapers

Chicago Tribune

Dallas Morning News

The Epoch Times

New Hampshire Union Leader

New York Observer

New York Post

The Spotlight

The Wall Street Journal (editorial board)

The Washington Times

Journals

American Affairs

The American Conservative

The American Spectator

American Thinker

City Journal

Claremont Review of Books

Commentary

Chronicles

The Dispatch

First Things

The Imaginative Conservative

Jewish World Review

Modern Age

National Affairs

The National Interest

National Review

The New American

The New Criterion

Newsmax

Policy Review

Spectator USA

Washington Examiner

The Weekly Standard

TV channels

CBN

Fox Business

Fox News

Newsmax TV

One America News Network

Websites

Babylon Bee

Breitbart News

The Bulwark

Campus Reform

Conservative Review

Daily Caller

Daily Signal

Daily Wire

Drudge Report

The Federalist

FrontPage Magazine

Gateway Pundit

Human Events

Independent Journal Review

InfoWars

Jihad Watch

LifeZette

NewsBusters

PJ Media

Rare

RedState

Taki's Magazine

Townhall

TruthRevolt

Twitchy

Washington Examiner

The Washington Free Beacon

The Western Journal

WorldNetDaily

Other

Alternative media

Blaze Media

PragerU

RSBN

The Rubin Report

Sinclair Broadcast Group

Variants and movements

Asian and Pacific Islander

Black

Christian right

Dark Enlightenment

Female

Green

LGBT

Libertarian Republicans

Militia movement

Patriot movement

Radical Right

Tea Party movement

Trumpism

Christian

See also

American nationalism

Barstool conservatism

Bibliography

Conservative talk radio

CPAC

Founding Fathers

Libertarianism

List

Prominent people

Political parties

 Conservatism portal

 United States portalvte

The meaning of conservatism in the United States is different from the way the word is used elsewhere. As historian Leo P. Ribuffo notes, "what Americans now call conservatism much of the world calls liberalism or neoliberalism".[66] However, the prominent American conservative writer Russell Kirk, in his influential work The Conservative Mind (1953), argued that conservatism had been brought to the United States and he interpreted the American Revolution as a "conservative revolution" against royalist innovation.[244]

American conservatism is a broad system of political beliefs in the United States, which is characterized by respect for American traditions, support for Judeo-Christian values, economic liberalism, anti-communism, and a defense of Western culture. Liberty within the bounds of conformity to conservatism is a core value, with a particular emphasis on strengthening the free market, limiting the size and scope of government, and opposing high taxes as well as government or labor union encroachment on the entrepreneur.

The 1830s Democratic Party became divided between Southern Democrats, who supported slavery, secession, and later segregation, and the Northern Democrats, who tended to support the abolition of slavery, union, and equality.[245] Many Democrats were conservative in the sense that they wanted things to be like they were in the past, especially as far as race was concerned. They generally favored poorer farmers and urban workers, and were hostile to banks, industrialization, and high tariffs.[246]

The post-Civil War Republican Party elected the first People of Color to serve in both local and national political office. The Southern Democrats united with pro-segregation Northern Republicans to form the Conservative Coalition, which successfully put an end to Blacks being elected to national political office until 1967, when Edward Brooke was elected Senator from Massachusetts.[247][248] Conservative Democrats influenced US politics until 1994's Republican Revolution, when the American South shifted from solid Democrat to solid Republican, while maintaining its conservative values.

In late 19th century, the Democratic Party split into two factions; the more conservative Eastern business faction (led by Grover Cleveland) favored gold, while the South and West (led by William Jennings Bryan) wanted more silver in order to raise prices for their crops. In 1892, Cleveland won the election on a conservative platform, which supported maintaining the gold standard, reducing tariffs, and taking a laissez-faire approach to government intervention. A severe nationwide depression ruined his plans. Many of his supporters in 1896 supported the Gold Democrats when liberal William Jennings Bryan won the nomination and campaigned for bimetalism, money backed by both gold and silver. The conservative wing nominated Alton B. Parker in 1904, but he got very few votes.[249][250]

The major conservative party in the United States today is the Republican Party, also known as the GOP (Grand Old Party). Modern American conservatives often consider individual liberty as the fundamental trait of democracy, as long as it conforms to conservative values, small government, deregulation of the government, economic liberalism, and free trade—which contrasts with modern American liberals, who generally place a greater value on social equality and social justice.[251][252] Other major priorities within American conservatism include support for the traditional family, law and order, the right to bear arms, Christian values, anti-communism, and a defense of "Western civilization from the challenges of modernist culture and totalitarian governments".[253] Economic conservatives and libertarians favor small government, low taxes, limited regulation, and free enterprise. Some social conservatives see traditional social values threatened by secularism; so, they support school prayer, and oppose abortion and homosexuality.[254] Neoconservatives want to expand American ideals throughout the world, and show a strong support for Israel.[255] Paleoconservatives oppose multiculturalism and press for restrictions on immigration.[256] Most US conservatives prefer Republicans over Democrats, and most factions favor a strong foreign policy and a strong military.

The conservative movement of the 1950s attempted to bring together the divergent conservative strands, stressing the need for unity to prevent the spread of "godless communism", which Reagan later labeled an "evil empire".[257][258] During the Reagan administration, conservatives also supported the so-called Reagan Doctrine, under which the US as part of a Cold War strategy provided military and other support to guerrilla insurgencies that were fighting governments identified as socialist or communist. The Reagan administration also adopted neoliberalism and Reaganomics (pejoratively referred to as trickle-down economics), resulting in the 1980s economic growth and trillion-dollar deficits. Other modern conservative positions include anti-environmentalism.[259] On average, American conservatives desire tougher foreign policies than liberals do.[260]

The Tea Party movement, founded in 2009, proved a large outlet for populist American conservative ideas. Their stated goals included rigorous adherence to the US constitution, lower taxes, and opposition to a growing role for the federal government in health care. Electorally, it was considered a key force in Republicans reclaiming control of the US House of Representatives in 2010.[261][262]

Oceania[edit]

Australia[edit]

Main article: Conservatism in Australia

This article is part of a series onConservatism in Australia

Principles

Agrarianism

Economic liberalism

Federalism

Free market

Free trade

Limited government

Loyalism

Monarchism

Nationalism

Property rights

Protectionism

Rule of law

Intellectuals

Blainey

Coleman

Donnelly

Harries

Henderson

Melluish

Minogue

Santamaria

Stove

Windschuttle

Jurists

Allan

Barton

Callinan

Craven

Dawson

Finnis

Flint

Gleeson

Gibbs

Hayne

Heydon

Kiefel

Steward

Wood

Commentators

Akerman

Albrechtsen

Bolt

Credlin

Dean

Devine (Frank)

Devine (Miranda)

Hadley

Jones

Kenny

Kerr

McGuinness

Mundine

Murray

van Onselen

Price

Vanstone

Politicians

Abbott

Anderson

Barton

Bernardi

Bonner

Canavan

Petersen

Dutton

Fraser

Gorton

Hanson

Holt

Howard

Joyce

Katter

Lyons

Menzies

Morrison

Mundine

Newman

Perrottet

Price

Reid

Vanstone

PartiesActive

Australian Christians

Democratic Labour Party

Family First (2021)

Katter's Australian

Liberal (Coalition)

National (Coalition)

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers

Defunct

Christian Democratic Party

Commonwealth Liberal Party

Conservatives

Conservative Party

Family First (2002)

Liberal (Queensland)

National (Queensland)

National Defence League

Nationalist Party

Organisations

Advance Australia

Australian Academy of Art

Australians for Constitutional Monarchy

Australian National Flag Association

CPAC Australia

Cormack Foundation

National Civic Council

Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation

Think tanks

Centre for Independent Studies

Institute of Public Affairs

Menzies Research Centre

Page Research Centre

Samuel Griffith Society

H. R. Nicholls Society

Mannkal Economic Education Foundation

MediaActive

ADH TV

The Australian

Counterpoint

The Daily Telegraph

News Weekly

Quadrant

Quasimodo

Sky News Australia

Defunct

The Argus

Related topics

Conservatism in New Zealand

Labor Right

Liberal Party factions

Moderates

Centre Right

National Right

Liberal conservatism

Liberalism in Australia

Politics of Australia

 Conservatism portal

 Australia portalvte

The Liberal Party of Australia adheres to the principles of social conservatism and liberal conservatism.[263] It is liberal in the sense of economics. Commentators explain: "In America, 'liberal' means left-of-center, and it is a pejorative term when used by conservatives in adversarial political debate. In Australia, of course, the conservatives are in the Liberal Party."[264] The National Right is the most organised and reactionary of the three faction within the party.[265]

Other conservative parties are the National Party of Australia (a sister party of the Liberals), Family First Party, Democratic Labor Party, Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party, Australian Conservatives, and the Katter's Australian Party.

The largest party in the country is the Australian Labor Party, and its dominant faction is Labor Right, a socially conservative element. Australia undertook significant economic reform under the Labor Party in the mid-1980s. Consequently, issues like protectionism, welfare reform, privatization, and deregulation are no longer debated in the political space as they are in Europe or North America.

Political scientist James Jupp writes that "[the] decline in English influences on Australian reformism and radicalism, and appropriation of the symbols of Empire by conservatives continued under the Liberal Party leadership of Sir Robert Menzies, which lasted until 1966".[266]

New Zealand[edit]

This article is part of a series onConservatism in New Zealand

Principles

Agrarianism

Economic liberalism

Law and order

Limited government

Loyalism

Monarchism

Property rights

Protectionism

Rule of law

Tradition

History

Historic conservatism in New Zealand (pre–1930s)

Politicians

Whitaker

Atkinson

Russell

Massey

Bell

Coates

Forbes

Hamilton

Holland

Holyoake

Marshall

Muldoon

Bolger

Richardson

Shipley

Birch

Copeland

English

Brash

Key

Bridges

Muller

Collins

Luxon

Activists

Ormond

Farrar

McCoskrie

Slater

Williams

PartiesActive

National Party

New Zealand First

New Conservatives Party

Defunct

Reform Party

United Party

Democrat Party

New Zealand Party

Christian Heritage Party

Conservative Party

Christian Democrats

Progressive Greens

Destiny New Zealand

The Kiwi Party

Focus NZ

The Family Party

Organisations and media

Auckland Future

Citizens' Association

Communities and Residents

Coalition of Concerned Citizens

Family First New Zealand

Investigate

Monarchy New Zealand

National Front

New Zealand Legion

Taxpayers' Union

Young Nationals

Related

Christian politics in New Zealand

Conservatism in Australia

Continuous Ministry

Liberalism in New Zealand

Politics of New Zealand

 Conservatism portal

 New Zealand portalvte

Historic conservatism in New Zealand traces its roots to the unorganised conservative opposition to the New Zealand Liberal Party in the late 19th century. In 1909 this ideological strand found a more organised expression in the Reform Party, a forerunner to the contemporary New Zealand National Party, which absorbed historic conservative elements.[267] The National Party, established in 1936, embodies a spectrum of tendencies, including conservative and liberal. Throughout its history, the party has oscillated between periods of conservative emphasis and liberal reform. Its stated values include "individual freedom and choice" and "limited government".[268]

In the 1980s and 1990s both the National Party and its main opposing party, the traditionally left-wing Labour Party, implemented free-market reforms.[269]

The New Zealand First party, which split from the National Party in 1993, espouses nationalist and conservative principles.[270]

Psychology[edit]

See also: Biology and political orientation

Conscientiousness[edit]

The Big Five Personality Model has applications in the study of political psychology. It has been found by several studies that individuals who score high in Conscientiousness (the quality of working hard and being careful) are more likely to possess a right-wing political identification.[271][272][273] On the opposite end of the spectrum, a strong correlation was identified between high scores in Openness to Experience and a left-leaning ideology.[271][274][275] Because conscientiousness is positively related to job performance,[276][277] a 2021 study found that conservative service workers earn higher ratings, evaluations, and tips than social liberal ones.[278]

Disgust sensitivity[edit]

A number of studies have found that disgust is tightly linked to political orientation. People who are highly sensitive to disgusting images are more likely to align with the political right and value traditional ideals of bodily and spiritual purity, tending to oppose, for example, abortion and gay marriage.[279][280][281][282]

Research in the field of evolutionary psychology has also found that people who are more disgust sensitive tend to favour their own in-group over out-groups. A proposed reason for this phenomenon is that people begin to associate outsiders with disease while associating health with people similar to themselves.[283] The higher one's disgust sensitivity is, the greater the tendency to make more conservative moral judgments. Disgust sensitivity is associated with moral hypervigilance, which means that people who have higher disgust sensitivity are more likely to think that suspects of a crime are guilty. They also tend to view them as evil, if found guilty, thus endorsing them to harsher punishment in the setting of a court.[284]

Authoritarianism[edit]

The right-wing authoritarian personality (RWA) is a personality type that describes somebody who is highly submissive to their authority figures, acts aggressively in the name of said authorities, and is conformist in thought and behaviour.[285] According to psychologist Bob Altemeyer, individuals who are politically conservative tend to rank high in RWA.[286] This finding was echoed by Theodor W. Adorno in The Authoritarian Personality (1950) based on the F-scale personality test.

A study done on Israeli and Palestinian students in Israel found that RWA scores of right-wing party supporters were significantly higher than those of left-wing party supporters.[287] However, a 2005 study by H. Michael Crowson and colleagues suggested a moderate gap between RWA and other conservative positions, stating that their "results indicated that conservatism is not synonymous with RWA".[288]

Ambiguity intolerance[edit]

In 1973, British psychologist Glenn Wilson published an influential book providing evidence that a general factor underlying conservative beliefs is "fear of uncertainty".[289] A meta-analysis of research literature by Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, and Sulloway in 2003 found that many factors, such as intolerance of ambiguity and need for cognitive closure, contribute to the degree of one's political conservatism and its manifestations in decision-making.[290][291] A study by Kathleen Maclay stated that these traits "might be associated with such generally valued characteristics as personal commitment and unwavering loyalty". The research also suggested that while most people are resistant to change, social liberals are more tolerant of it.[292]

Social dominance orientation[edit]

Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a personality trait measuring an individual's support for social hierarchy and the extent to which they desire their in-group be superior to out-groups. Psychologist Felicia Pratto and her colleagues have found evidence to support the claim that a high SDO is strongly correlated with conservative views and opposition to social engineering to promote equality.[293] Pratto and her colleagues also found that high SDO scores were highly correlated with measures of prejudice.[citation needed]

However, David J. Schneider argued for a more complex relationships between the three factors, writing that "correlations between prejudice and political conservatism are reduced virtually to zero when controls for SDO are instituted, suggesting that the conservatism–prejudice link is caused by SDO".[294] Conservative political theorist Kenneth Minogue criticized Pratto's work, saying:

It is characteristic of the conservative temperament to value established identities, to praise habit and to respect prejudice, not because it is irrational, but because such things anchor the darting impulses of human beings in solidities of custom which we do not often begin to value until we are already losing them. Radicalism often generates youth movements, while conservatism is a condition found among the mature, who have discovered what it is in life they most value.[295]

A 1996 study by Pratto and her colleagues examined the topic of racism. Contrary to what these theorists predicted, correlations between conservatism and racism were strongest among the most educated individuals, and weakest among the least educated. They also found that the correlation between racism and conservatism could be accounted for by their mutual relationship with SDO.[296]

Happiness[edit]

In his book Gross National Happiness (2008), Arthur C. Brooks presents the finding that conservatives are roughly twice as happy as social liberals.[297] A 2008 study suggested that conservatives tend to be happier than social liberals because of their tendency to justify the current state of affairs and to remain unbothered by inequalities in society.[298] A 2012 study disputed this, demonstrating that conservatives expressed greater personal agency (e.g., personal control, responsibility), more positive outlook (e.g., optimism, self-worth), and more transcendent moral beliefs (e.g., greater religiosity, greater moral clarity).[299]

Prominent conservative politicians[edit]

William Pitt the Younger

John Adams

Klemens von Metternich

Otto von Bismarck

Benjamin Disraeli

Lord Salisbury

Stanley Baldwin

Engelbert Dollfuß

Ioannis Metaxas

Winston Churchill

Konrad Adenauer

Charles de Gaulle

Francisco Franco

Margaret Thatcher

Ronald Reagan

See also[edit]

National variants[edit]

Conservatism in Australia

Conservatism in Bangladesh

Conservatism in Brazil

Conservatism in Canada

Conservatism in Colombia

Conservatism in Germany

Conservatism in Hong Kong

Conservatism in India

Conservatism in Malaysia

Conservatism in New Zealand

Conservatism in Pakistan

Conservatism in Peru

Conservatism in Russia

Conservatism in Serbia

Conservatism in South Korea

Conservatism in Taiwan

Conservatism in Turkey

Conservatism in the United Kingdom

Conservatism in the United States

Ideological variants[edit]

Authoritarian conservatism

Black conservatism

Corporatist conservatism

Cultural conservatism

Feminist conservatism

Fiscal conservatism

Green conservatism

LGBT conservatism

Liberal conservatism

Libertarian conservatism

Moderate conservatism

National conservatism

Neoconservatism

Paternalistic conservatism

Pragmatic conservatism

Progressive conservatism

Populist conservatism

Social conservatism

Traditionalist conservatism

Ultraconservatism

Related topics[edit]

Christian democracy

Christian right

Communitarianism

Counter-revolutionary

Familialism

Historism

Reactionary

Right realism

Small-c conservative

Toryism

Traditionalist Catholicism

References[edit]

^ a b Hamilton, Andrew (2019). "Conservatism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

^ Encyclopædia Britannica: "Conservatism, political doctrine that emphasizes the value of traditional institutions and practices."

^ Heywood 2004, pp. 166–167: "In particular, conservatives have emphasized that society is held together by the maintenance of traditional institutions such as the family and by respect for an established culture, based upon religion, tradition and custom."

^ O'Hara, Kieron (2011). Conservatism. London: Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-86189-812-8. It is clear that conservatives are influenced not only by their ideology, but also by the political context – no surprise there – but contexts vary and so, therefore, do conservatives.

^ Giubilei 2019, p. 37: "Conservatives aim to conserve the natural and fundamental elements of society, which are: private property, family, the homeland, and even religion […] the right-wing conservative is such not because he wants to conserve any regime and any institutions, but rather specific institutions and particular values."

^ a b c d e Encyclopædia Britannica.

^ O'Gorman, Frank (2003). Edmund Burke: His Political Philosophy. Routledge. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-415-32684-1.

^ DeMarco, Carl (January 1, 2023). "A Historical and Philosophical Comparison: Joseph de Maistre & Edmund Burke". The Gettysburg Historical Journal. 22 (1). ISSN 2327-3917.

^ "Book Review | Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition, by Edmund Fawcett". The Independent Institute. Retrieved January 23, 2024.

^ a b Muller 1997, p. 26.

^ Heywood 2012, p. 66.

^ Vincent, Andrew (2009). Modern Political Ideologies. John Wiley & Sons. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-4443-1105-1.

^ Fawcett 2020, p. 59.

^ Winthrop, Norman (1983). Liberal Democratic Theory and Its Critics. Croom Helm Ltd. pp. 163–166. ISBN 978-0-7099-2766-2.

^ Hogg Baron Hailsham of St. Marylebone, Quintin (1959). The Conservative Case. Penguin Books.

^ Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Intellectual-roots-of-conservatism

^ Heywood 2004, p. 346.

^ a b Heywood 2017, p. 66.

^ Robin, Corey (January 8, 2012). "The Conservative Reaction". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 23, 2016.

^ Finseraas, Henning (2010). "What if Robin Hood is a social conservative? : How the political response to increasing inequality depends on party polarization". Socio-Economic Review. 8 (2): 283–306. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp012.

^ Farrell, Henry (February 1, 2018). "Trump is a typical conservative". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 29, 2023.

^ Hazony, Yoram (2022). Conservatism: A Rediscovery. Swift Press. pp. 125–133. ISBN 9781800752344.

^ "hierarchy". Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Heywood 2017, p. 67.

^ Fawcett 2020, p. 48.

^ Giubilei 2019, pp. 18–19.

^ Ashford, Nigel; Davies, Stephen, eds. (2011). A Dictionary of Conservative and Libertarian Thought. Routledge. pp. 14–17. ISBN 978-0-415-67046-3.

^ Kruger, Danny (2007). On Fraternity : Politics Beyond Liberty & Equality. Institute for the Study of Civil Society. p. 13. ISBN 9781903386576.

^ Weber, Max (1922). Economy and Society. p. 215.

^ Reinhard, Bendix (1977). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. University of California Press. p. 295. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.

^ Kojève 2020, pp. 14–28.

^ Nisbet, Robert A. (1993) [1966]. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-56000-667-1.

^ Kojève 2020, p. xvii.

^ Arendt, Hannah (1954). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. Viking Press. pp. 91–92.

^ Kojève 2020, pp. xviii–xix.

^ Bullock, Alan; Trombley, Stephen; Lawrie, Alf (1999). The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought (3 ed.). HarperCollins Publishers. p. 729. ISBN 978-0-00-255871-6.

^ "reactionary". Merriam-Webster. May 9, 2023.

^ McLean & McMillan 2009.

^ Robin, Corey (2018). The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0190692001. This book is about the second half of the story, the demarche, and the political ideas –– variously called conservative, reactionary, revanchist, counterrevolutionary –– that grow out of and give rise to it.

^ Lilla, Mark (2016). "Introduction". The Shipwrecked Mind: On Political Reaction. New York Review Books. pp. xii. ISBN 978-1590179024. Reactionaries are not conservatives. This is the first thing to be understood about them. They are, in their way, just as radical as revolutionaries and just as firmly in the grip of historical imaginings.

^ Wilson, Francis (1951). The Case for Conservatism. Transaction Publishers. p. 2. ISBN 978-1412842341.

^ a b Siegfried, Heit; Johnston, Otto W. (1980). "German Romanticism: An Ideological Response to Napoleon". Consortium on Revolutionary Europe 1750–1850: Proceedings. Vol. 9. pp. 187–197.

^ King, Peter (2012). Reaction: Against the Modern World. Andrews UK Limited.

^ Ferraresi, Franco (1987). "Julius Evola: Tradition, Reaction, and the Radical Right". European Journal of Sociology. 28 (1): 107–151. doi:10.1017/S0003975600005415. S2CID 143934026.

^ Campbell, Francis Stuart. "Credo of a Reactionary". The American Mercury.

^ Lukacs, John (2000). Confessions of an Original Sinner. St. Augustine's Press. ISBN 9781890318123.

^ Eccleshall 1990, pp. ix, 21

^ Wolin, Sheldon S. (September 2, 2013). "Hume and Conservatism". American Political Science Review. 48 (4): 999–1016. doi:10.2307/1951007. JSTOR 1951007. S2CID 53138291.

^ Heywood, Andrew (2003). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (3 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-333-96178-0.

^ Lock, F. P. (2006). Edmund Burke. Volume II: 1784–1797. Clarendon Press. p. 585.

^ Stanlis, Peter J. (2009). Edmund Burke: Selected Writings and Speeches. Transaction Publishers. p. 18.

^ Auerbach 1959, p. 33.

^ "Conservatives can't claim Edmund Burke as one of their own | Aeon Essays". Aeon. Retrieved January 23, 2024.

^ Kopalyan, Nerses (2010). In Defense of Edmund Burke's Aristocratic Order. Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN 9783843375436.

^ Auerbach 1959, pp. 37–40.

^ Auerbach 1959, pp. 52–54.

^ Auerbach 1959, p. 41.

^ Adams, Ian (2002). Political Ideology Today (2 ed.). Manchester University Press. p. 46.

^ Fawcett 2020, p. 20.

^ Fawcett 2020, pp. 25–30.

^ Fawcett 2020, pp. 5–7.

^ Grigsby, Ellen (2008). Analyzing Politics. Cengage Learning. pp. 108–109, 112, 347. ISBN 978-0-495-50112-1.

^ a b McAnulla, Stuart (2006). British Politics: A Critical Introduction. A&C Black. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-8264-6155-1.

^ Giubilei 2019, p. 21.

^ Nisbet, Robert (2017). Conservatism: Dream and Reality. Routledge. pp. 28–31. ISBN 9781351526487.

^ a b Ribuffo, Leo P. (January 14, 2011). "Twenty Suggestions for Studying the Right Now that Studying the Right Is Trendy". Historically Speaking. 12 (1): 6. doi:10.1353/hsp.2011.0013. S2CID 144367661.

^ Sally, Razeen (2002). Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 0-415-16493-1.

^ Gregg, Samuel (2010). Wilhelm Röpke's Political Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-84844-222-1.

^ "The Maturing of a Humane Economist Modern Age". March 23, 2007. Archived from the original on March 23, 2007. Retrieved July 11, 2021.

^ "Interview With Samuel Edward Konkin III". www.spaz.org.

^ Dionne, Jr., E.J. (1991). Why Americans Hate Politics. Simon & Schuster. p. 161.

^ Freeman, Robert M. (1999). Correctional Organization and Management: Public Policy Challenges, Behavior, and Structure. Elsevier. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-7506-9897-9.

^ Mandal, V.C. (2007). Dictionary of Public Administration. Sarup & Sons. p. 306. ISBN 978-81-7625-784-8.

^ Eliot, T.S. (1984). Notes Towards the Definition of Culture. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-26533-6.

^ "Parties and Elections Resources and Information". www.parties-and-elections.de.

^ Traynor, Ian (April 4, 2006). "The EU's weary travellers". The Guardian. Archived from the original on April 7, 2006.

^ "In Defense of Nations". National Review. September 13, 2018. Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved October 29, 2018.

^ Frohnen 2006, pp. 870–875.

^ Cram, Ralph Adams (1936). "Invitation to Monarchy".

^ Lind, William S. (2006). "The Prussian Monarchy Stuff". LewRockwell.com. Center for Libertarian Studies.

^ Leslie Wayne (January 6, 2018). "What's the Cure for Ailing Nations? More Kings and Queens, Monarchists Say". The New York Times.

^ Seaton, James (1996). Cultural Conservatism, Political Liberalism: From Criticism to Cultural Studies. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-10645-5.

^ Heywood 2017, p. 69.

^ The Next Digital Divide Archived 2011-06-06 at the Wayback Machine (utne article)

^ "The World & I". The World & I. Vol. 1, no. 5. Washington Times Corp. 1986. Retrieved August 19, 2011. militant atheism was incompatible with conservatism

^ Peter Davies; Derek Lynch (2002). The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-21494-0. In addition, conservative Christians often endorsed far-right regimes as the lesser of two evils, especially when confronted with militant atheism in the USSR.

^ Peter L. Berger; Grace Davie; Effie Fokas (2008). Religious America, Secular Europe?: A Theme and Variations. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-6011-8. Retrieved August 19, 2011. If anything the reverse is true: moral conservatives continue to oppose secular liberals on a wide range of issues.

^ Andersen, Margaret L., Taylor, Howard Francis. Sociology: Understanding a Diverse Society Archived December 5, 2022, at the Wayback Machine Cengage Learning, 4th Ed. (2005), pp. 469–470. ISBN 978-0-534-61716-5

^ "So Christians do not approve of the taking of illegal drugs, including most recreational drugs, especially those which can alter the mind and make people incapable of praying or being alert to God". Archived from the original on October 20, 2017.

^ Petersen, David L. (2005). "Genesis and Family Values". Journal of Biblical Literature. 124 (1).

^ Heywood, Andrew (2013). Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-137-27244-7.

^ Heywood 2012, p. 80.

^ Dunleavy, Patrick; et al. (2000). British Political Science: Fifty Years of Political Studies. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 107–108.

^ Robert Blake (1967). Disraeli (2 ed.). Eyre & Spottiswoode. p. 524.

^ Russel, Trevor (1978). The Tory Party: Its Policies, Divisions and Future. Penguin. p. 167.

^ John Alden Nichols. Germany after Bismarck, the Caprivi era, 1890–1894: Issue 5. Harvard University Press, 1958. p. 260

^ a b Jonathan Lurie. William Howard Taft: The Travails of a Progressive Conservative. New York, New York, US: Cambridge University Press, 2012. p.196

^ Bischof, Günter, ed. (1995). Eisenhower: A Centenary Assessment. LSU Press. p. 98. ISBN 9780807119426.

^ a b Hugh Segal. The Right Balance. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Douglas & McIntyre, 2011. pp. 113–148

^ Pinto, António; Kallis, A. (2014). Rethinking Fascism and Dictatorship in Europe. Springer. ISBN 978-0-7190-2354-5.

^ Lewis, David. Illusions of Grandeur: Mosley, Fascism, and British Society, 1931-81. Manchester University Press. p. 218.

^ Freeden, Michael; Sargent, Lyman; Stears, Marc (August 15, 2013). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. OUP Oxford. pp. 294–297. ISBN 978-0-19-958597-7.

^ Michael H. Kater. Never Sang for Hitler: The Life and Times of Lotte Lehmann, 1888–1976. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 167

^ Miklós Lojkó. Meddling in Middle Europe: Britain and the 'Lands Between, 1919–1925, Central European University Press, 2005, p. 180

^ Sørensen, Gert; Mallett, Robert (2002). International Fascism,1919-45 (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 159. ISBN 978-0714682624.

^ Howard J. Wiarda, Margaret MacLeish Mott. Catholic Roots and Democratic Flowers: Political Systems in Spain and Portugal. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001. p. 49

^ a b Bischof 2003, p. 26.

^ Stanley G. Payne. Fascism in Spain, 1923–1977. Madison: Wisconsin University Press, 1999. pp. 77–102.

^ Blinkhorn 1990, p. 10.

^ Cyprian Blamires. World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, Volume 1. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2006. p. 21

^ Tomasevich, Jozo (2001). War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: Occupation and Collaboration. Stanford University Press. pp. 33–34. ISBN 978-0-8047-3615-2.

^ Butnaru, Ion C., The Silent Holocaust: Romania and Its Jews (1992), Praeger/Greenwood: Westport, pp. 62–63

^ Balfour, Michael (1964). The Kaiser and his Times. Houghton Mifflin. p. 409.

^ "The Kaiser on Hitler" (PDF). Ken. December 15, 1938. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ Seymour M. Lipset, "Social Stratification and 'Right-Wing Extremism'" British Journal of Sociology 10#4 (1959), pp. 346–382 on-line Archived April 22, 2022, at the Wayback Machine

^ Fawcett 2020, p. 263.

^ Remmer 1989, p. 10.

^ Remmer 1989, pp. 5–6.

^ Rachman, Gideon (2022). The Age of The Strongman. Vintage Publishing. ISBN 9781847926418.

^ Ware 1996, pp. 31–33.

^ "BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party". Sydney Morning Herald. October 16, 2022. Archived from the original on July 1, 2023. Retrieved July 1, 2023.

^ "How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades". The Times of India. April 16, 2022. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved July 1, 2023.

^ "Narendra Modi's Message to America". National Review. June 23, 2022. Archived from the original on July 1, 2023. Retrieved July 1, 2023. His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development.

^ Abhilasha Kumari; Sabina Kidwai (1998). Crossing the Sacred Line: Women's Search for Political Power. Orient Blackswan. p. 83. ISBN 978-81-250-1434-8. BJP propounds and extends the ideology of cultural nationalism.

^ Hussin Mutalib (2004). Parties and Politics. A Study of Opposition Parties and the PAP in Singapore. Marshall Cavendish Adademic. p. 20. ISBN 981-210-408-9.

^ Byung-Kook Kim., & Vogel, E. F (2013). The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Harvard University Press. pp. 200–205. ISBN 978-0-674-06106-4.

^ Blinkhorn 1990, p. 7.

^ Gordon Craig, "The System of Alliances and the Balance of Power." in J.P.T. Bury, ed., The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. 10: The Zenith of European Power, 1830–70 (1960), p. 266.

^ von Kuehnelt-Leddihn 1943, pp. 139–140.

^ Brook-Shepherd, Gordon (1996). The Austrians: A Thousand-Year Odyssey. HarperCollins. p. 283. ISBN 0-00-638255-X.

^ Pyrah, Robert (2007). "Enacting Encyclicals? Cultural Politics and 'Clerical Fascism' in Austria, 1933–1938". Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 8 (2): 369–382. doi:10.1080/14690760701321338. S2CID 144326749 – via Taylor & Francis Online.

^ Congdon, Lee (March 26, 2012). "Kuehnelt-Leddihn and American Conservatism". Crisis Magazine. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ Binder, Dieter A. (2009). The Christian Corporatist State. Routledge. p. 73. ISBN 9781351315203.

^ von Kuehnelt-Leddihn 1943, p. 210.

^ Jelavich, Barbara (1989). Modern Austria: Empire & Republic 1815–1986. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-31625-1.

^ "Sebastian Kurz, der "junge Metternich"". kurier.at (in German). January 16, 2014. Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved December 15, 2023.

^ Annesley 2005, p. 124.

^ Zig Layton-Henry, ed. Conservative Politics in Western Europe (St. Martin's Press, 1982)

^ Paul Lucardie and Hans-Martien Ten Napel, "Between confessionalism and liberal conservatism: the Christian Democratic parties of Belgium and the Netherlands Archived June 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine." in David Hanley, ed. Christian Democracy in Europe: A Comparative Perspective (London: Pinter 1994) pp. 51–70

^ Philippe Siuberski (October 7, 2014). "Belgium gets new government with Michel as PM". Yahoo News. AFP. Retrieved November 7, 2014.

^ a b Skov, Christian Egander. "Konservatisme". danmarkshistorien.dk (in Danish). Retrieved July 17, 2023.

^ euconedit (September 17, 2023). "Nordic Conservative Homecoming". europeanconservative.com. Retrieved December 3, 2023.

^ Annesley 2005, p. 68.

^ Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina (July 10, 2023). "Det Konservative Folkeparti". Den Store Danske (in Danish). Retrieved July 17, 2023.

^ Abildlund, Andreas (October 9, 2015). "Den konservative højrefløj er gået i udbrud". Information (in Danish).

^ Critique – Idédebat og kulturkamp, 2 December 2010: "Konservatismen og kongedømmet" Archived March 19, 2022, at the Wayback Machine

^ Folketinget: "Partiernes historie" Archived March 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine

^ Berlingske, 8 July 2014: "Kongehuset bringer danskerne sammen" Archived March 18, 2022, at the Wayback Machine

^ Det Konservative Folkeparti: "Vi elsker Kongehuset" Archived March 19, 2022, at the Wayback Machine

^ Siaroff 2000, p. 243.

^ Helsingin Sanomat, 11 October 2004, International poll: Anti-Russian sentiment runs very strong in Finland. Only Kosovo has more negative attitude

^ Jussi M. Hanhimäki (1997). Containing Coexistence: America, Russia, and the "Finnish Solution". Kent State UP. p. 4. ISBN 9780873385589.

^ The Finnish Civil War 1918: History, Memory, Legacy. BRILL. 2014. p. 166. ISBN 978-90-04-28071-7.

^ Levitsky, Steven; Ziblatt, Daniel (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown. ISBN 9781524762933.

^ Woodwards, E. L. (1963). Three Studies In European Conservatism: Metternich, Guizot, The Catholic Church In The Nineteenth Century. Archon Books. ISBN 9780714615295.

^ Fawcett 2020, pp. 20–21.

^ Roger Price (2005). A Concise History of France. Cambridge UP. p. 225. ISBN 978-0-521-84480-2.

^ Judaken, Jonathan (2005). "Action Française". In Richard S. Levy (ed.). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution. ABC-CLIO. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-85109-439-4.

^ Maurice Larkin, Religion, politics and preferment in France since 1890: La Belle Epoque and its legacy (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

^ Stanley Hoffmann, "The Vichy Circle of French Conservatives" in Hoffmann, Decline or Renewal? France since 1930s (1974) pp. 3–25

^ Viereck, Peter (2005). Conservatism Revisited: The Revolt Against Ideology. Transaction Publishers. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-7658-0576-8.

^ Richard Vinen, "The Parti républicain de la Liberté and the Reconstruction of French Conservatism, 1944–1951", French History (1993) 7#2 pp. 183–204

^ Ware 1996, p. 32.

^ Hauss, Charles (2008). Comparative Politics: Domestic Responses to Global Challenges. Cengage Learning. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-495-50109-1.

^ "Eric Zemmour: Meet the right-wing TV pundit set to shake up France's presidential race". euronews.com. October 13, 2021. Retrieved October 30, 2021.

^ Tingsten, Herbert (1966). "De kontrarevolutionära idéerna i Tyskland". De konservativa idéerna. Aldus/Bonniers. pp. 42–73. OCLC 1166587654. Retrieved August 29, 2023.

^ Steinberg, Jonathan (2011). Bismarck: A Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 416–417. ISBN 978-0-19-978252-9.

^ Kersbergen, Kees van; Vis, Barbara (2013). Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development, Opportunities, and Reform. Cambridge UP. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-107-65247-7.

^ Moore, Robert Laurence; Vaudagna, Maurizio (2003). The American Century in Europe. Cornell University Press. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-8014-4075-5.

^ Frankel, Richard (2003). "From the Beer Halls to the Halls of Power: The Cult of Bismarck and the Legitimization of a New German Right, 1898–1945". German Studies Review. 26 (3): 543–560. doi:10.2307/1432746. JSTOR 1432746.

^ Stern, Fritz (1961). The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520026261.

^ Woods, Roger (1996). The Conservative Revolution in the Weimar Republic. St. Martin's Press. p. 29. ISBN 0-333-65014-X.

^ Ringer, Fritz K. (1990). The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. University Press of New England. p. 201.

^ Shirer, William L. (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York City: Simon and Schuster. p. 372. ISBN 0671624202.

^ Michael John Williams (February 12, 2020). "The German Center Does Not Hold". New Atlanticist. Archived from the original on June 20, 2020. Retrieved March 7, 2020.

^ Penniman, Howard Rae. Greece at the polls: the national elections of 1974 and 1977. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1981. ISBN 978-0-8447-3434-7 pp. 49–59

^ "Ανεξάρτητοι Έλληνες – 404 error". anexartitoiellines.gr. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2020.

^ Grofman, Bernard and Lijpart, Arend, editors. The evolution of electoral and party systems in the Nordic countries. New York: Agathon Press, 2002. "The Icelandic electoral system 1844–1999" by Olafur Th. Hardarson ISBN 978-0-87586-138-8, pp. 107–108

^ De Grand, Alexander (2000). Italian Fascism: its Origins and Development (3rd ed.). University of Nebraska Press. p. 145.

^ Sternhill, Zeev (1998). "Fascism". In Griffin, Roger (ed.). International Fascism: Theories, Causes, and the New Consensus. London, England; New York: Arnold Publishers. p. 32.

^ Stefano Fella, and Carlo Ruzza, Re-inventing the Italian Right: Territorial politics, populism and 'post-fascism'. (Routledge, 2009).

^ Bocca, Giorgio (1981). Storia della Repubblica italiana (in Italian). Rizzoli. pp. 14–16.

^ Pepijn Corduwener, The Problem of Democracy in Postwar Europe: Political Actors and the Formation of the Postwar Model of Democracy in France, West Germany and Italy (Taylor & Francis, 2016), pp. 15, 17, 27, 40, 42.

^ Denis Mack Smith, Modern Italy: A Political History (1997), pp. 491––496.

^ Daniele Albertazzi, et al., eds. Resisting the tide: cultures of opposition under Berlusconi (2001–06) (Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2009).

^ Antonino Castaldo, and Luca Verzichelli. "Technocratic populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The trendsetter and his disciples." Politics and Governance 8.4 (2020): 485–495.

^ Urwin, Derek W. A Dictionary of European History and Politics, 1945–1995. London: Pearson, 1996. ISBN 978-0-582-25874-7 p. 76

^ "Netherlands: Geert Wilders, the Dutch "Cricket"". March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on January 26, 2022. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ Heidar, Knut (2001). Norway: Elites on Trial. Boulder Westview Press. pp. 66–67. ISBN 978-0-8133-3200-0.

^ Francis Sejersted Høyrebølgen Archived December 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Store norske leksikon. Retrieved December 18, 2013 (in Norwegian)

^ Sergei Prozorov, "Russian conservatism in the Putin presidency: The dispersion of a hegemonic discourse." Journal of Political Ideologies 10.2 (2005): 121–143 online Archived June 6, 2021, at the Wayback Machine.

^ Tiounine, Margot; Hannen, Tom, eds. (June 27, 2019). "Liberalism 'has outlived its purpose' — President Putin speaks exclusively to the Financial Times". Financial Times. Retrieved October 14, 2023.

^ Marlene Laruelle, "The Izborsky Club, or the new conservative avant‐garde in Russia." The Russian Review 75.4 (2016): 626–644.

^ Sirke Mäkinen, "Surkovian narrative on the future of Russia: making Russia a world leader." Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27#2 (2011): 143–165.

^ Mark Woods, "How the Russian Orthodox Church is backing Vladimir Putin's new world order" Christian Today March 3, 2016 Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine

^ Andrew Higgins, "In Expanding Russian Influence, Faith Combines With Firepower", New York Times Sept 13, 2016 Archived November 10, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

^ Rodhe, Edvard (1942). Geijer och samhället : en studie i svensk tradition. p. 131. OCLC 873899895. Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ Book review of Philosophy of Religion by Christopher Jacob Bostrom, trans. Victor E. Beck and Robert N. Beck. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 57. (October 1964), p. 381.

^ Söderbaum, Jakob E:son (2020). Modern konservatism. Borås: Recito. p. 289. ISBN 978-91-7765-497-1.

^ Abrahamsson, Christian (December 18, 2023). "Den organiska statsteorin". Radikalkonservatismens rötter – Rudolf Kjellén och 1914 års idéer. Timbro. pp. 43–56. ISBN 978-91-7703-243-4. OCLC 1241263181. Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ Isaksson, Anders (1985). Per Albin. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand. p. 184. ISBN 978-91-46-15026-8.

^ Söderbaum, Jakob E:son (October 4, 2022). "KD är det mest konservativa partiet". strengnastidning.se. Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ Uvell, Markus (2018). Bakslaget: radikalt etablissemang, konservativa medborgare. Stockholm: Timbro förlag. ISBN 978-91-7703-129-1.

^ Cornucopia (June 21, 2018). "Yougov: SD största parti med 28.5% av väljarstödet". Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ Majlard, Jan (November 15, 2019). "SD största parti i ny mätning". Svenska Dagbladet (in Swedish). ISSN 1101-2412. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ SVT Nyheter (March 21, 2019). "KD-ledaren öppnar för SD-samarbete". SVT Nyheter (in Swedish). Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ SVT Nyheter (October 14, 2022). "L, KD och M ska ingå i regeringen – SD får stort inflytande". SVT Nyheter (in Swedish). Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ Oscarsson, Tea (October 14, 2022). "'Tidöavtalet' – här är viktigaste punkterna". Svenska Dagbladet (in Swedish). ISSN 1101-2412. Retrieved December 17, 2023.

^ Ziebertz, Hans-Georg (2011). How Teachers in Europe Teach Religion: An International Empirical Study: An International Empirical Study in 16 Countries. Lit Verlag. p. 237. ISBN 978-3-643-10043-6.

^ Juravich, Tom (2000). Ravenswood: The Steelworkers' Victory and the Revival of American Labor. Cornell University Press. p. 133. ISBN 978-0-8014-8666-1.

^ a b Schwok, René (2009). Switzerland – European Union: An Impossible Membership?. Peter Lang. p. 143. ISBN 978-90-5201-576-7.

^ Siaroff 2000, p. 446.

^ The Stephen Roth Institute. Anti-semitism worldwide Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002 ISBN 0-8032-5943-3 p. 120

^ Hainsworth, Paul (2008). The Extreme Right in Western Europe. Routledge. pp. 44 and 74. ISBN 978-0-415-39682-0.

^ "Conservatism". encyclopediaofukraine.com. Retrieved February 15, 2022.

^ a b c Sack, J. J. (1987). "The Memory of Burke and the Memory of Pitt: English Conservatism Confronts Its Past, 1806–1829". The Historical Journal. 30 (3): 623–640. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00020914. S2CID 154447696.

^ Gregory Claeys, "Political Thought", in Chris Williams, ed., A Companion to 19th-Century Britain (2006). p. 195

^ Charles Richmond; Paul Smith (1998). The Self-Fashioning of Disraeli, 1818–1851. Cambridge UP. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-521-49729-9.

^ Auerbach 1959, pp. 39–40.

^ Eccleshall 1990, p. 83

^ Eccleshall 1990, p. 90

^ Eccleshall 1990, p. 121

^ Eccleshall 1990, pp. 6–7

^ Stuart Ball, "Baldwin, Stanley, first Earl Baldwin of Bewdley (1867–1947)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography 2004.

^ Ross McKibbin, Parties and people: England, 1914–1951 (Oxford, 2010).

^ Garside, W.R.; Greaves, J.I. (1997). "Rationalisation and Britain's industrial Malaise: The interwar years revisited Archived February 25, 2021, at the Wayback Machine". Journal of European Economic History. 26 (1): 37–68.

^ McLean & McMillan 2009, p. 364.

^ Middlebrook, Kevin J. Conservative parties, the right, and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000 ISBN 978-0-8018-6386-8 pp. 1–52.

^ Fierlbeck, Katherine. Political thought in Canada: an intellectual history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006. ISBN 978-1-55111-711-9 pp. 87–88

^ Freyre, Gilberto (1943). "Em Torno Do Problema De Uma Cultura Brasileira". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 4 (2): 167–171. doi:10.2307/2103064. JSTOR 2103064.

^ Gonzalez, Eduardo (December 6, 2011). "Brazil Shatters Its Wall of Silence on the Past". International Center for Transitional Justice. Retrieved March 18, 2012.

^ Boulos, Guilherme. "Onda Conservadora". Folha de S. Paulo. Retrieved January 4, 2024.

^ "Lula lidera, e Bolsonaro se consolida em 2º, aponta Datafolha". Poder. December 2, 2017. Retrieved December 7, 2017.

^ Oppenheim, Lois Hecht (2007). Politics in Chile: Socialism, Authoritarianism, and Market Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-4227-6

^ Guy-Meakin, Amelia (September 17, 2012). "Augusto Pinochet and the Support of Chilean Right-Wing Women". E-International Relations.

^ Valdes, Juan Gabriel (August 17, 1995). Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile. Cambridge University Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-0-521-45146-8.

^ Osterling, Jorge P. (1989). Democracy in Colombia: Clientelist Politics and Guerrilla Warfare. Transaction Publishers. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-88738-229-1.

^ Grant, George (2005) [1965]. Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism. McGill-Queen's Press. ISBN 9780773530102.

^ Kornberg, Allan and Mishler, William. Influence in Parliament, Canada. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1976. p. 38

^ Schultze, Rainer-Olaf; Sturm, Roland and Eberle, Dagmar. Conservative parties and right-wing politics in North America: reaping the benefits of an ideological victory?. Germany: VS Verlag, 2003. ISBN 978-3-8100-3812-8 p. 15

^ Panizza, Francisco. Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso, 2005. ISBN 978-1-85984-489-2 p. 180

^ Conway, John Frederick. Debts to pay: the future of federalism in Quebec. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company, 2004. ISBN 978-1-55028-814-8 pp. 57, 77

^ Hazony, Yoram (June 15, 2018). "Jordan Peterson and Conservatism's Rebirth". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved December 23, 2023.

^ Kirk, Russell (2001). The Conservative Mind. Regnery Publishing. pp. 6, 63. ISBN 978-0-89526-171-7.

^ "Reconstruction: Radicalism versus Conservatism". www.andrewjohnson.com.

^ Michael Kazin, What It Took to Win: A History of the Democratic Party (2022) p xii.

^ Lyman, Brian. "Fact check: Yes, historians do teach that first Black members of Congress were Republicans". USA TODAY. Retrieved May 1, 2022.

^ Haught, By James A. (September 15, 2016). "How Democrats and Republicans switched beliefs [Opinion]". Houston Chronicle.

^ See David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito. "Gold Democrats and the Decline of Classical Liberalism, 1896–1900" Archived March 26, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.

^ John M. Pafford, The Forgotten Conservative: Rediscovering Grover Cleveland (Simon and Schuster, 2013).

^ (Schneider 2009, p. 4–9, 136): "The label (conservatism) is in frequent use and has come to stand for a skepticism, at times an outright hostility, toward government social policies; a muscular foreign policy combined with a patriotic nationalism; a defense of traditional Christian religious values; and support for the free market economic system."

^ Sherwood Thompson, Encyclopedia of Diversity and Social Justice p. 7: "Historically...social justice became associated with liberalism in which equality is the ideal.", Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, ISBN 978-1-4422-1604-4.

^ Schneider 2009, p. xii.

^ Cal Jillson (February 22, 2011). Texas Politics: Governing the Lone Star State. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-82941-7. Retrieved January 19, 2012. Social conservatives focus on moral or values issues, such as abortion, marriage, school prayer, and judicial appointments.

^ Frohnen 2006, pp. ix–xiv.

^ Michael Foley (2007). American credo: the place of ideas in US politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-152833-0. Retrieved January 18, 2012. Against accusations of being pre-modern or even anti-modern in outlook, paleoconservatives press for restrictions on immigration, a rollback of multicultural programmes, the decentralization of the federal polity, the restoration of controls upon free trade, a greater emphasis upon economic nationalism and isolationism in the conduct of American foreign policy, and a generally revanchist outlook upon a social order in need of recovering old lines of distinction and in particular the assignment of roles in accordance with traditional categories of gender, ethnicity, and race.

^ Gottfried, Paul E. (2007). Conservatism in America: Making Sense of the American Right. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 9. ISBN 9781403974327. Post-war conservatives set about creating their own synthesis of free-market capitalism, Christian morality, and the global struggle against Communism

^ Gottfried, Paul Edward (January 1, 1995). Theologies and Moral Concern. Transaction Publishers. p. 12.

^ Jacques, Peter J.; Dunlap, Riley E.; Freeman, Mark (May 20, 2008). "The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism". Environmental Politics. 17 (3): 349–385. Bibcode:2008EnvPo..17..349J. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576. S2CID 144975102.

^ Gries, Peter Hayes (2014). The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives over Foreign Affairs. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804790925.

^ Williamson, Vanessa; Skocpol, Theda (2012). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford University Press. pp. 45–82. ISBN 9780199832637.

^ "Katie Couric Interviews Tea Party Leaders". CBS News. January 25, 2010. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2012.

^ Dennis Raphael (2012). Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International Experiences. Canadian Scholars' Press. p. 66. ISBN 978-1-55130-412-0.

^ David Mosler; Robert Catley (1998). America and Americans in Australia. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-275-96252-4.

^ Massola, James (March 21, 2021). "Who's who in the Liberals' left, right and centre factions?". The Sydney Morning Herald.

^ James Jupp (2004). The English in Australia. Cambridge University Press. p. 172. ISBN 978-0-521-54295-1.

^ James, Colin (June 20, 2012). "National Party – Formation and rise". Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved December 9, 2023.

^ James, Colin (June 20, 2012). "National Party – Party principles". Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved December 9, 2023.

^ Boston, Jonathan; Eichbaum, Chris (July 2014). "New Zealand's Neoliberal Reforms: Half a Revolution". Governance. 27 (3): 373–376. doi:10.1111/gove.12092.

^ David Hall (2021). "Rhetoric and reality in New Zeland's climate leadership". In Rüdiger K.W. Wurzel; Mikael Skou Andersen; Paul Tobin (eds.). Climate Governance across the Globe: Pioneers, Leaders and Followers. Routledge. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-000-320381.

^ a b Gerber AS, et al. (2010). "Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts". The American Political Science Review. 104: 111–133. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000031. S2CID 6208090.

^ Sweetser KD (2014). "Partisan Personality: The Psychological Differences Between Democrats and Republicans, and Independents Somewhere in Between". American Behavioral Scientist. 58 (9): 1183–94. doi:10.1177/0002764213506215. S2CID 145674720.

^ Fatke M (2017). "Personality Traits and Political Ideology: A First Global Assessment". Political Psychology. 38 (5): 881–99. doi:10.1111/pops.12347.

^ Bakker BN, et al. (2015). "Personality Traits and Party Identification over Time". European Journal of Political Research. 54 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12070.

^ Gerber AS, et al. (2012). "Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification". Political Behavior. 34 (4): 653–688. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9178-5. S2CID 144317734.

^ Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., Donavan, D. T., & Licata, J. W. (2002). The customer orientation of service workers: Personality trait effects on self-and supervisor performance ratings. Journal ofMarketing Research, 39, 110–119.

^ Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 175–192.

^ Davidson, A., & Theriault, D. A. (2021). How Consumer Experience Is Shaped by the Political Orientation of Service Providers. Journal of Consumer Psychology.

^ Inbar, Yoel, et al. (2012). "Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3 (5): 537–544. doi:10.1177/1948550611429024. S2CID 1890061.

^ Ahn, Woo-Young, et al. (November 2014). "Nonpolitical Images Evoke Neural Predictors of Political Ideology". Current Biology. 24 (22): 2693–2699. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.050. PMC 4245707. PMID 25447997.

^ Dan Jones. "Left or right-wing? Brain's disgust response tells all". New Scientist. Retrieved July 18, 2023.

^ Y. Inbar; et al. (2008). "Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals" (PDF). Cognition and Emotion. 23 (4): 714–725. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.372.3053. doi:10.1080/02699930802110007. S2CID 7411404.

^ Navarrete, Carlos David; Fessler, Daniel M.T. (2006). "Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes". Evolution and Human Behavior. 27 (4): 270–282. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.12.001.

^ David, B.; Olatunji, B.O. (2011). "The effect of disgust conditioning and disgust sensitivity on appraisals of moral transgressions". Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (7): 1142–1146. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.004.

^ "Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)". dictionary.apa.org. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2021.

^ Altemeyer, Bob (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. ISBN 978-0-88755-124-6.

^ Rubinstein, G. (1996). "Two Peoples in One Land: A Validation Study of Altemeyer's Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale in the Palestinian and Jewish Societies in Israel". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 27 (2): 216–230. doi:10.1177/0022022196272005. S2CID 146603681.

^ Crowson, H. Michael; Thoma, Stephen J.; Hestevold, Nita (August 7, 2010). "Is Political Conservatism Synonymous With Authoritarianism?". The Journal of Social Psychology. 145 (5): 571–592. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592. PMID 16201679. S2CID 30468730.

^ Wilson, Glenn D. (2013). The Psychology of Conservatism. Routledge. ISBN 9781135094454.

^ Jost, John T.; Glaser, Jack; Kruglanski, Arie W.; Sulloway, Frank J. (2003). "Political conservatism as motivated social cognition". Psychological Bulletin. 129 (3): 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339. PMID 12784934. S2CID 1778256.

^ Chan, EY; Ilicic, J (2019). "Political ideology and brand attachment". International Journal of Research in Marketing. 36 (4): TBD. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.04.001. S2CID 182260170.

^ "Researchers help define what makes a political conservative". 2003.

^ Pratto, Felicia; Sidanius, Jim; Stallworth, Lisa M.; Malle, Bertram F. (1994). "Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67 (4): 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741. S2CID 215415408.

^ Schneider, David J. (April 7, 2005). The Psychology of Stereotyping. Guilfold Press. p. 275.

^ Kuper, Adam (May 13, 2013). The Social Science Encyclopedia (2nd ed.). Routledge. pp. 155–156.

^ Sidanius, J; Pratto, F; Bobo, L (1996). "Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70 (3): 476–490. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.474.1114. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 17, 2015.

^ Brooks, Arthur C. (2008). Gross National Happiness: Why Happiness Matters for America—and How We Can Get More of It. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-1-5113-9186-3.

^ Napier, J.L.; Jost, J.T. (2008). "Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?". Psychological Science. 19 (6): 565–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x. PMID 18578846. S2CID 22998780.

^ Schlenker, Barry; Chambers, John; Le, Bonnie (April 2012). "Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality and life satisfaction". Journal of Research in Personality. 46 (2): 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009. Retrieved July 31, 2021.

Bibliography[edit]

Annesley, Claire (2005). A Political and Economic Dictionary of Western Europe. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-85743-214-5.

Auerbach, M. Morton (1959). The Conservative Illusion. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-598-37476-9.

Bischof, Günter J., ed. (2003). The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria: A Reassessment. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9781412821896.

Blinkhorn, Martin (1990). Fascists and Conservatives: The Radical Right and the Establishment in Twentieth-Century Europe. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-04-940087-0.

Eccleshall, Robert (1990). English Conservatism since the Restoration: An Introduction and Anthology. Unwin Hyman. ISBN 978-0-04-445346-8.

"Conservatism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved May 1, 2022.

Fawcett, Edmund (2020). Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-17410-5.

Frohnen, Bruce; et al. (2006). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. ISI Books. ISBN 978-1-932236-43-9.

Giubilei, Francesco (2019). The History of European Conservative Thought. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781621579090.

Heywood, Andrew (2004). Political Theory: An Introduction (3 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780333961803.

Heywood, Andrew (2012). Political Ideologies: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-36994-8.

Heywood, Andrew (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-60604-4.

Kojève, Alexandre (2020) [1942]. The Notion of Authority: A Brief Presentation. Verso Books. ISBN 9781788739610.

von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Erik (1943). The Menace of the Herd; or, Procrustes at Large. Ludwig von Mises Institute. OCLC 733805752.

McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2009). Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199207800.

Muller, Jerry Z. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691037110.

Remmer, Karen L. (1989). Military Rule in Latin America. Westview. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8133-8450-4.

Schneider, Gregory (2009). The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9780742542846.

Siaroff, Alan (2000). Comparative European Party Systems. Garland. ISBN 0-8153-2930-X.

Ware, Alan (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-878076-2.

Further reading[edit]

General

Green, E.H.H. (2002). Ideologies of Conservatism: Conservative Political Ideas in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191069031.

Hazony, Yoram (2022). Conservatism: A Rediscovery. Forum. ISBN 9781800752344.

Kirk, Russell (2001). The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot (7 ed.). Regnery Publishing. ISBN 9780895261717.

Kirk, Russell (2019). Russell Kirk's Concise Guide to Conservatism. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781621578789.

Nisbet, Robert (2002). Conservatism: Dream and Reality. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9780765808622.

Scruton, Roger (2002). The Meaning of Conservatism (3 ed.). St. Augustine's Press. ISBN 9781890318406.

Viereck, Peter (1949). Conservatism Revisited: The Revolt Against Ideology. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9781412820233.

Witonski, Peter, ed. (1971). The Wisdom of Conservatism (4 ed.). Arlington House. ISBN 9780870001185. [2396 pages; worldwide sources]

Conservatism and fascism

Crowson, N. J. (1997). Facing Fascism: The Conservative Party and the European Dictators, 1935–1940. Psychology Press. ISBN 9780415153157.

Evola, Julius (2013). Fascism Viewed from the Right. Arktos. ISBN 9781907166921.

Conservatism and liberalism

Carey, George (2008). "Conservatism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing; Cato Institute. pp. 93–95. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4.

Dyson, K. (2021). Conservative Liberalism, Ordo-Liberalism, and the State: Disciplining Democracy and the Market. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198854289.

Schlueter, N.; Wenzel, N. (2016). Selfish Libertarians and Socialist Conservatives?: The Foundations of the Libertarian-Conservative Debate. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804792912.

Conservatism and women

Bacchetta, Paola; Power, Margaret (2002). Right-Wing Women: From Conservatives to Extremists Around the World. Psychology Press. ISBN 9780415927772.

Blee, Kathleen M.; McGee Deutsch, Sandra, eds. (2012). Women of the Right: Comparisons and Interplay Across Borders. Penn State University Press. ISBN 9780271052151.

Critchlow, Donald T. (2008). Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman's Crusade. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691136240.

Nickerson, M.M. (2014). Mothers of Conservatism: Women and the Postwar Right. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691163918.

Conservatism in Germany

Epstein, K. (2015). The Genesis of German Conservatism. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400868230.

von Klemperer, K. (2015). Germany's New Conservatism: Its History and Dilemma in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400876372.

Lebovics, H. (1969). Social Conservatism and the Middle Class in Germany, 1914–1933. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400879038.

Mohler, Armin (2018) [1949]. The Conservative Revolution in Germany, 1918–1932. Washington Summit Publishers. ISBN 9781593680596.

Conservatism in Latin America

Luna, J.P.; Kaltwasser, C.R. (2014). The Resilience of the Latin American Right. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9781421413914.

Middlebrook, Kevin J. (2000). Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9780801863851.

Conservatism in Russia

Laqueur, Walter (2015). Putinism: Russia and Its Future with the West. Macmillan. ISBN 9781466871069.

Pipes, Richard (2007). Russian Conservatism and Its Critics: A Study in Political Culture. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300122695.

Robinson, Paul (2019). Russian Conservatism. Cornell University Press. ISBN 9781501747342.

Conservatism in the United Kingdom

Jones, Emily (2017). Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830–1914. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198799429.

Gilmartin, Kevin (2010). Writing against Revolution: Literary Conservatism in Britain, 1790–1832. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521142199.

Nugent, Neill (1977). The British Right: Conservative and Right Wing Politics in Britain. Saxon House. ISBN 9780566001567.

Soffer, R. (2008). History, Historians, and Conservatism in Britain and America: From the Great War to Thatcher and Reagan. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191548956.

Conservatism in the United States

Allitt, Patrick N. (2009). The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300155297.

Continetti, Matthew (2022). The Right: The Hundred-Year War for American Conservatism. Basic Books. ISBN 9781541600508.

Goldwater, Barry (2007) [1960]. The Conscience of a Conservative. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691131177.

Nash, George H. (2006) [1976]. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945. Regnery Publishing. ISBN 9781933859125.

Nelson, Jeffrey O.; et al. (2014). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Open Road Media. ISBN 9781497651579.

Schneider, Gregory L., ed. (2003). Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader. NYU Press. ISBN 9780814797990.

Schulman, B.J. (2008). Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674267138.

Will, George (2019). The Conservative Sensibility. Hachette Books. ISBN 9780316480932.

Psychology

Haidt, Jonathan (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided By Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 9780307377906.

Lakoff, G. (2016). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226411323.

Wailoo, K. (2014). Pain: A Political History. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9781421413662.

Other

Corrêa de Oliveira, Plinio (2003) [1960]. Revolution and Counter-revolution. The American TFP. ISBN 9781877905179.

Hibbard, S.W. (2010). Religious Politics and Secular States: Egypt, India, and the United States. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9780801899201.

Thayer, N.B. (2015). How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400871414.

de Tocqueville, Alexis (2011) [1856]. The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139498814.

Woodwards, E. L. (1963). Three Studies In European Conservatism: Metternich, Guizot, The Catholic Church In The Nineteenth Century. Archon Books. ISBN 9780714615295.

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to Conservatism.

Conservatism an article by Encyclopædia Britannica.

Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Conservatism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Conservatism at Curlie

vteConservatism

Timeline

Schoolsby regionInternational

Authoritarian

Corporatist

Cultural

Fiscal

Green

Liberal

Moderate

National

Paternalistic

Populist

Pragmatic

Progressive

Reactionary

Religious

Social

Traditionalist

Ultra

North AmericaCanada

Populism

Trumpism

Clerico-nationalism

Social

Toryism

Blue

Red

Pink

UnitedStates

Compassionate

Libertarian

Fusionism

Paleo

Tea Party

Movement

Neo

Old Right

Paleo

Reaganism

Social

Traditionalist

Trumpism

Latin AmericaArgentina

Federal Peronism

Menemism

Orthodox Peronism

Brazil

Bolsonarism

Coronelism

Integralism

Janismo

Monarchist

Patrianovism

Populism

Chilean

Gremialismo

Pinochetism

Other

Belize

Colombian

Rojismo

Uribism

Cuba

Guatemala

Mexico

Panama

Peruvian

Fujimorism

 Odriismo

Venezuelan

Perezjimenismo

AsiaChina

Chiangism

Confucianism

Neo

New

Neoauthoritarianism

Israel

Fundamentalist

Jewish

Kahanism

Zionism

Neo

Religious

Revisionist

Japan

Neo

Nippon Kaigi

Shōwa Statism

State Shinto

South Korea

Ilminism

New Right

Turkey

Democratic

Erdoğanism

Neo-Ottomanism

Other

Bangladesh

Hong Kong

India

Iran

Monarchist

Malaysia

Pakistan

Singapore

Taiwan

Chiangism

EuropeFrance

Action Française

Bonapartism

Gaullism

Integral nationalism

Legitimism

Maurrassisme

Nouvelle Droite

Orléanism

Sarkozysm

Ultra-royalism

Germany

Agrarian

Hegelian

Historical School

Neue Rechte

Ordoliberalism

Revolutionary

Young

Ritter School

Romanticism

State Socialism

Italy

Berlusconism

Historical Right

Italian school of elitism

Sanfedismo

Poland

Golden Liberty

Kaczyzm

National Democracy

Sarmatism

Russia

Eurasianism

Monarchist

Black-hundredism

Tsarism

Putinism

Slavophilia

Pochvennichestvo

Spain

Alfonsism

Carlism

Carloctavismo

Carlo-francoism

Francoism

National Catholicism

Integrism

Mellismo

Maurism

Neocatholicism

Noucentisme

UnitedKingdom

Cameronism

Compassionate

Muscular liberalism

Neo

One-nationism

Powellism

Thatcherism

Toryism

High

Red

Social

Other

Austria

Belgium

Denmark

Finland

Georgia

Monarchist

Greece

Metaxism

Populism

Iceland

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Norway

Portugal

Miguelist

Romania

Monarchist

Serbia

Monarchist

Sweden

Switzerland

Ukraine

Oceania

Australia

Centre Right

National Right

New Zealand

PhilosophyConcepts

Ancestral worship

Authority

Traditional

Class collaboration

Convention

Cultural heritage

Culture of life

Pro-Life

Custom

Discipline

Duty

Elitism

Aristocracy

Meritocracy

Noblesse oblige

Ethical order

Familialism

Family values

Fundamentalism

Gender role

Complementarianism

Honour

Imperialism

Loyalty

Monarchism

Royalism

Ordered liberty

Organicism

Orthodoxy

Patriotism

Private property

Public morality

Social hierarchy

Social institutions

Social norm

Social order

Solidarity

Sovereignty

Stewardship

Subsidiarity

Tradition

Philosophers

Bainville

Barruel

Belloc

Bonald

Buckley Jr.

Burke

Burnham

Chateaubriand

Chesterton

Coleridge

Comte

Cortés

Dávila

Dostoevsky

Eliot

Evola

Gentz

Haller

Hitchens

Hume

Iorga

Johnson

Jünger

Karamzin

Kirk

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

La Mennais

Le Bon

Le Play

Leontiev

Lewis

Maistre

Mansfield

Maurras

Menéndez

More

Müller

Newman

Nisbet

Novalis

Oakeshott

Corrêa de Oliveira

Ranke

Rivarol

Röpke

Santayana

Savigny

Schlegel

Schmitt

Scruton

Solzhenitsyn

Sowell

Spann

Spengler

Stahl

Strauss

Taine

Tocqueville

Uvarov

Voegelin

PoliticsOrganisations

Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

European Conservatives and Reformists Party

European People's Party

Identity and Democracy

International Democrat Union

Muslim Brotherhood

Tradition, Family, Property

Politicians

Abe

Adams

Adenauer

Andreotti

Berlusconi

Bismarck

Bolsonaro

Bush Jr.

Canning

Chiang

Churchill

Diefenbaker

Disraeli

Dmowski

Dollfuss

Erdoğan

Franco

Fujimori

de Gaulle

Harper

Horthy

John Paul II

Kaczyński

Khamenei

Khomeini

Kohl

Le Pen

Lee

Macdonald

Mannerheim

Marcos

Maurras

Menzies

Metaxas

Metternich

Mobutu

Modi

Netanyahu

Orbán

Park

Pérez Jiménez

Pinochet

Pitt

Powell

Prat de la Riba

Putin

Reagan

Salazar

Salisbury

Smith

Stolypin

Suharto

Thatcher

Trujillo

Trump

de Valera

Zemmour

Religion

Anglo-Catholicism

Christian right

Theoconservatism

Clericalism

Conservative Christianity

Hindutva

Jewish conservatism

Religious Zionism

Islamism

Traditionalist Catholicism

Integralism

Ultramontanism

Traditionalist School

Perennialism

Historicalbackground

Ancien Régime

Bourbon Restauration

Congress of Vienna

Conservative Order

Counter-Enlightenment

German Romanticism

Holy Alliance

Ultra-royalism

RelatedIdeologies

Agrarianism

Christian democracy

Clerical fascism

Communitarianism

Conservative liberalism

Corporatism

Anti-communism

Anti-gender movement

Anti-Masonry

Aristocracy

Black conservatism

United States

Catholic social teaching

Conservative feminism

Conservative wave

Counter-revolutionary

Elite theory

Hispanic conservatism

United States

LGBT conservatism

Radical right

Europe

United States

Reactionary

Neo

Right realism

Right-wing politics

Authoritarianism

New

Europe

Old

Small-c conservatives

Conservatism portal

Politics portal

Links to related articles

Conservatism by continent

vteConservatism in AsiaSovereign states

Afghanistan

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Bhutan

Brunei

Cambodia

China

Cyprus

East Timor (Timor-Leste)

Egypt

Georgia

India

Indonesia

Iran

Iraq

Israel

Japan

Jordan

Kazakhstan

North Korea

South Korea

Kuwait

Kyrgyzstan

Laos

Lebanon

Malaysia

Maldives

Mongolia

Myanmar

Nepal

Oman

Pakistan

Philippines

Qatar

Russia

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

Sri Lanka

Syria

Tajikistan

Thailand

Turkey

Turkmenistan

United Arab Emirates

Uzbekistan

Vietnam

Yemen

States withlimited recognition

Abkhazia

Northern Cyprus

Palestine

South Ossetia

Taiwan

Dependencies andother territories

British Indian Ocean Territory

Christmas Island

Cocos (Keeling) Islands

Hong Kong

Macau

Category

Asia portal

vteConservatism in EuropeSovereign states

Albania

Andorra

Armenia

Austria

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Belgium

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bulgaria

Croatia

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Finland

France

Georgia

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Iceland

Ireland

Italy

Kazakhstan

Latvia

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Moldova

Monaco

Montenegro

Netherlands

North Macedonia

Norway

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Russia

San Marino

Serbia

Slovakia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

States with limitedrecognition

Abkhazia

Kosovo

Northern Cyprus

South Ossetia

Transnistria

Dependencies andother entities

Åland

Faroe Islands

Gibraltar

Guernsey

Isle of Man

Jersey

Svalbard

vteConservatism in North America Sovereign states

Antigua and Barbuda

Bahamas

Barbados

Belize

Canada

Costa Rica

Cuba

Dominica

Dominican Republic

El Salvador

Grenada

Guatemala

Haiti

Honduras

Jamaica

Mexico

Nicaragua

Panama

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Trinidad and Tobago

United States

Dependencies andother territories

Anguilla

Aruba

Bermuda

Bonaire

British Virgin Islands

Cayman Islands

Curaçao

Greenland

Guadeloupe

Martinique

Montserrat

Puerto Rico

Saint Barthélemy

Saint Martin

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

Saba

Sint Eustatius

Sint Maarten

Turks and Caicos Islands

United States Virgin Islands

vteConservatism in South AmericaSovereign states

Argentina

Bolivia

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Ecuador

Guyana

Paraguay

Peru

Suriname

Uruguay

Venezuela

Dependencies andother territories

Falkland Islands

French Guiana

South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

vtePolitical ideologies

The Establishment

Anti

Hardline

Moderate

Political spectrum

Far-left

Left-wing

Centre-left

Centrism

Centre-right

Right-wing

Far-right

Radical

Reactionary

Revolutionary

Accelerationism

Agrarianism

Anarchism

Capitalism

Christian democracy

Communalism

Communism

Communitarianism

Confucianism

Conservatism

Constitutionalism

Corporatism

Distributism

Social credit

Environmentalism

Familialism

Fascism

Nazism

Third Position

Feminism

Fundamentalism

Green

Islamism

Liberalism

Libertarianism

Marxism

Masculism

Monarchism

Royalism

Nationalism

Republicanism

Classical

Modern

Social democracy

Socialism

Third Way

Zionism

See also

Authoritarianism

Anti

Collectivism

Colonialism

Culturalism

Inter

Mono

Multi

Extremism

Federalism

Globalism

Imperialism

Individualism

Internationalism

Localism

Militarism

Nihilism

Pacifism

Pluralism

Populism

Progressivism

Reformism

Regionalism

Separatism

Statism

Syncretism

Totalitarianism

vteSocial philosophyConcepts

Anomie

Convention

Customs

Cultural heritage

Culturalism

Inter

Mono

Multi

Culture

Counter

Familialism

History

Honour

Human nature

Identity

Formation

Ideology

Institutions

Invisible hand

Loyalty

Modernity

Morality

Public

Mores

National character

Natural law

Reification

Ressentiment

Rights

Sittlichkeit

Social alienation

Social norms

Spontaneous order

Stewardship

Traditions

Values

Family

Volksgeist

Worldview

Schools

Budapest School

Catholic social teaching

Distributism

Communitarianism

Confucianism

Conservatism

Social

Frankfurt School

Personalism

PhilosophersAncient

Augustine

Cicero

Confucius

Lactantius

Laozi

Mencius

Mozi

Origen

Philo

Plato

Plutarch

Polybius

Tertullian

Thucydides

Xunzi

Medieval

Alpharabius

Aquinas

Avempace

Bruni

Dante

Gelasius

Ibn Khaldun

Maimonides

Muhammad

Photios

Plethon

Ibn Tufayl

Early modern

Calvin

Erasmus

Guicciardini

Locke

Luther

Milton

Montaigne

Müntzer

18th and 19thcenturies

Arnold

Bentham

Bonald

Burke

Carlyle

Comte

Condorcet

Emerson

Engels

Fichte

Fourier

Franklin

Hegel

Helvétius

Herder

Hume

Jefferson

Kant

Kierkegaard

Le Bon

Le Play

Marx

Mill

Nietzsche

Owen

Renan

Rousseau

Royce

Ruskin

Smith

Spencer

de Staël

Stirner

Taine

Thoreau

Tocqueville

Vico

Vivekananda

Voltaire

20th and 21stcenturies

Adorno

Agamben

Arendt

Aron

Badiou

Baudrillard

Bauman

Benoist

Berlin

Butler

Camus

de Beauvoir

Debord

Deleuze

Dewey

Du Bois

Durkheim

Eco

Evola

Foucault

Fromm

Gandhi

Gehlen

Gentile

Gramsci

Guénon

Habermas

Han

Heidegger

Hoppe

Irigaray

Kirk

Kołakowski

Kropotkin

Land

Lasch

MacIntyre

Marcuse

Maritain

Negri

Niebuhr

Nussbaum

Oakeshott

Ortega

Pareto

Polanyi

Radhakrishnan

Röpke

Santayana

Scruton

Shariati

Simmel

Skinner

Sombart

Sowell

Spengler

Taylor

Voegelin

Walzer

Weber

Weil

Zinn

Žižek

Works

De Officiis (44 BC)

Oration on the Dignity of Man (1486)

A Vindication of Natural Society (1756)

Democracy in America (1835–1840)

Civilization and Its Discontents (1930)

The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1935)

The Second Sex (1949)

One-Dimensional Man (1964)

The Society of the Spectacle (1967)

The History of Sexuality (1976)

The Culture of Narcissism (1979)

A Conflict of Visions (1987)

The Closing of the American Mind (1987)

Gender Trouble (1990)

The Malaise of Modernity (1991)

Intellectuals and Society (2010)

See also

Agnotology

Axiology

Critical theory

Cultural criticism

Cultural pessimism

Ethics

Historism

Historicism

Humanities

Philosophy of culture

Philosophy of education

Philosophy of history

Political philosophy

Social criticism

Social science

Social theory

Sociology

Category

vteWestern world and cultureFoundations

Cradle of civilization

Old World

Greco-Roman world

Greece

Hellenistic Kingdoms

Rome

Roman Empire

Western

Eastern

Roman legacy

Romanization

Romano-Germanic culture

Christendom

History

European Bronze Age

Classical antiquity

Late antiquity

Middle Ages

early

high

late

Renaissance

Early modern period

Age of Discovery

Reformation

Age of Enlightenment

Scientific Revolution

Late modern period

Age of Revolution

Romanticism

Abolitionism

Emancipation

Capitalism

Industrial Revolution

Great Divergence

Modern era

Modernism

World War I

Interwar period

Universal suffrage

World War II

Cold War

Post–Cold War era

Information age

War on terror

Post-Western era

Culture

Alphabet

Greek

Latin

Cyrillic

Architecture

Art

Periods

Calendar

Cuisine

Diet

Classical tradition

Studies

Clothing

History

Dance

Esotericism

Astrology

Folklore

Immigration

Law

Languages

Eurolinguistics

Standard Average European

Literature

Canon

Media

Internet

Music

Chant

Classical

Folk

Mythology

Painting (contemporary)

Philosophy

Science

Values

Religion

East–West Schism

Western Christianity

Decline

Secularism

Sport

Philosophy

Ancient Greek philosophy

Hellenistic philosophy

Ancient Roman philosophy

Judeo-Christian ethics

Christian philosophy

Scholasticism

Rationalism

Empiricism

Existentialism

Christian existentialism

Humanism

Christian humanism

Secular humanism

Liberalism

Conservatism

Socialism

Continental philosophy

Analytic philosophy

Post-structuralism

Tolerance

Paradox

Relativism

Peritrope

Atlanticism

Values

Religion

Abrahamic

Judaism

Culture

Christianity

Culture

Western/Eastern

Catholic Church

Latin Church

Eastern Orthodoxy

Greek Orthodox Church

Protestantism

Bábism

Baháʼí

Druze

Mandaeism

Rastafari

Samaritanism

Paganism

Baltic

Celtic

Finnish

Germanic

Anglo-Saxon

Frankish

Gothic

Old Norse

Hellenistic

Roman

Slavic

Neo

Agnosticism

Atheism

Law

Natural law

Rule of law

Equality before the law

Constitutionalism

Human rights

Life

Thought

Speech

Press

Religion

Property

Democracy

International law

Contemporaryintegration

ABCANZ Armies

Anglo-Portuguese Alliance

ANZUS

Arctic Council

AUKUS

Baltic Assembly

Benelux

British–Irish Council

Bucharest Nine

Council of Europe

Craiova Group

EEA

EFTA

ESA

EU

EU Customs Union

Eurozone

EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Five Eyes

G7

Lancaster House Treaties

Lublin Triangle

NATO

Nordic Council

OAS

OSCE

Pacific Islands Forum

PROSUL/PROSUR

Rio Treaty

Schengen

Special Relationship

Three Seas Initiative

USMCA

Visegrád Group

West Nordic Council

Western Bloc

Western European and Others Group

Westernization

Portals: Conservatism Current events Politics

Authority control databases National

Germany

Israel

United States

Czech Republic

Other

Historical Dictionary of Switzerland

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism&oldid=1212956829"

Categories: ConservatismRight-wing ideologiesSocial theoriesPolitical theoriesHidden categories: Webarchive template wayback linksCS1 German-language sources (de)CS1 Danish-language sources (da)CS1 Italian-language sources (it)Articles with Norwegian-language sources (no)CS1 Swedish-language sources (sv)Articles with short descriptionShort description is different from WikidataUse mdy dates from April 2022Use American English from April 2022All Wikipedia articles written in American EnglishArticles containing French-language textAll articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from December 2023Articles with unsourced statements from March 2021Pages using multiple image with auto scaled imagesWikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2023Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2014Articles containing German-language textArticles containing Italian-language textArticles containing Norwegian-language textArticles containing Swedish-language textUse New Zealand English from July 2017All Wikipedia articles written in New Zealand EnglishArticles with unsourced statements from January 2023Articles with Curlie linksArticles with GND identifiersArticles with J9U identifiersArticles with LCCN identifiersArticles with NKC identifiersArticles with HDS identifiers

This page was last edited on 10 March 2024, at 10:42 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0;

additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view

Toggle limited content width

Conservatism | History, Intellectual Foundations, & Examples | Britannica

Conservatism | History, Intellectual Foundations, & Examples | Britannica

Search Britannica

Click here to search

Search Britannica

Click here to search

Login

Subscribe

Subscribe

Home

Games & Quizzes

History & Society

Science & Tech

Biographies

Animals & Nature

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Money

Videos

On This Day

One Good Fact

Dictionary

New Articles

History & Society

Lifestyles & Social Issues

Philosophy & Religion

Politics, Law & Government

World History

Science & Tech

Health & Medicine

Science

Technology

Biographies

Browse Biographies

Animals & Nature

Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates

Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates

Environment

Fossils & Geologic Time

Mammals

Plants

Geography & Travel

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Entertainment & Pop Culture

Literature

Sports & Recreation

Visual Arts

Companions

Demystified

Image Galleries

Infographics

Lists

Podcasts

Spotlights

Summaries

The Forum

Top Questions

#WTFact

100 Women

Britannica Kids

Saving Earth

Space Next 50

Student Center

Home

Games & Quizzes

History & Society

Science & Tech

Biographies

Animals & Nature

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Money

Videos

conservatism

Table of Contents

conservatism

Table of Contents

IntroductionGeneral characteristicsIntellectual roots of conservatismThe Burkean foundationsMaistre and Latin conservatismConservatism in the 19th centuryMetternich and the Concert of EuropeThe retreat of old-style conservatismConservatism and nationalismGreat BritainChristian DemocracyThe United StatesConservatism since the turn of the 20th centuryGreat BritainContinental EuropeJapanThe United StatesLegacy and prospects

References & Edit History

Related Topics

Images

For Students

conservatism summary

Related Questions

Where did Marine Le Pen finish in the 2022 French presidential election?

Read Next

World Poetry Day

Discover

8 Must-See Paintings at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

Why Doesn’t Arizona Observe Daylight Saving Time?

7 Famous Child Prodigies

The Seven Sacraments of the Roman Catholic church

7 Deadliest Weapons in History

The Largest Islands in the World

Ten Days That Vanished: The Switch to the Gregorian Calendar

Home

Politics, Law & Government

Politics & Political Systems

History & Society

conservatism

political philosophy

Actions

Cite

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.

Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

MLA

APA

Chicago Manual of Style

Copy Citation

Share

Share

Share to social media

Facebook

Twitter

URL

https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism

Give Feedback

External Websites

Feedback

Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).

Feedback Type

Select a type (Required)

Factual Correction

Spelling/Grammar Correction

Link Correction

Additional Information

Other

Your Feedback

Submit Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Conservatism

Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems - Conservatism

Humanities LibreTexts - Conservatism

The Heritage Foundation - What is Conservatism?

Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Political Ideologies and Worldviews: An Introduction - Conservatism Today and Tomorrow: An Ideology Without a Party, or a Party Without an Ideology?

The Basics of Philosophy - Conservatism

The Russell Kirk Center - Ten Conservative Principles

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

conservatism - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Print

print

Print

Please select which sections you would like to print:

Table Of Contents

Cite

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.

Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

MLA

APA

Chicago Manual of Style

Copy Citation

Share

Share

Share to social media

Facebook

Twitter

URL

https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism

Feedback

External Websites

Feedback

Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).

Feedback Type

Select a type (Required)

Factual Correction

Spelling/Grammar Correction

Link Correction

Additional Information

Other

Your Feedback

Submit Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Conservatism

Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems - Conservatism

Humanities LibreTexts - Conservatism

The Heritage Foundation - What is Conservatism?

Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Political Ideologies and Worldviews: An Introduction - Conservatism Today and Tomorrow: An Ideology Without a Party, or a Party Without an Ideology?

The Basics of Philosophy - Conservatism

The Russell Kirk Center - Ten Conservative Principles

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

conservatism - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Written by

Terence Ball

Emeritus Professor of Political Science, Arizona State University, Tempe. Author of Reappraising Political Theory and others.

Terence Ball,

Richard Dagger

Professor of Political Science, Arizona State University, Tempe. Author of Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism and others.

Richard Dagger,

Peter Viereck

Emeritus Professor of History, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts. Author of Conservatism Revisited and others.

Peter ViereckSee All

Fact-checked by

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Last Updated:

Mar 7, 2024

Article History

Table of Contents

François-Auguste-René, vicomte de Chateaubriand

See all media

Category:

History & Society

Key People:

St. Pius X

Marcel Lefebvre

Carl Ferdinand Wilhelm Walther

(Show more)

Related Topics:

political system

ideology

neotraditionalism

paleoconservatism

(Show more)

On the Web:

Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Political Ideologies and Worldviews: An Introduction - Conservatism Today and Tomorrow: An Ideology Without a Party, or a Party Without an Ideology? (Mar. 07, 2024)

(Show more)

See all related content →

conservatism, political doctrine that emphasizes the value of traditional institutions and practices.Conservatism is a preference for the historically inherited rather than the abstract and ideal. This preference has traditionally rested on an organic conception of society—that is, on the belief that society is not merely a loose collection of individuals but a living organism comprising closely connected, interdependent members. Conservatives thus favour institutions and practices that have evolved gradually and are manifestations of continuity and stability. Government’s responsibility is to be the servant, not the master, of existing ways of life, and politicians must therefore resist the temptation to transform society and politics. This suspicion of government activism distinguishes conservatism not only from radical forms of political thought but also from liberalism, which is a modernizing, antitraditionalist movement dedicated to correcting the evils and abuses resulting from the misuse of social and political power. In The Devil’s Dictionary (1906), the American writer Ambrose Bierce cynically (but not inappropriately) defined the conservative as “a statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others.” Conservatism must also be distinguished from the reactionary outlook, which favours the restoration of a previous, and usually outmoded, political or social order.It was not until the late 18th century, in reaction to the upheavals of the French Revolution (1789), that conservatism began to develop as a distinct political attitude and movement. The term conservative was introduced after 1815 by supporters of the newly restored Bourbon monarchy in France, including the author and diplomat Franƈois-Auguste-René, vicomte de Chateaubriand. In 1830 the British politician and writer John Wilson Croker used the term to describe the British Tory Party (see Whig and Tory), and John C. Calhoun, an ardent defender of states’ rights in the United States, adopted it soon afterward. The originator of modern, articulated conservatism (though he never used the term himself) is generally acknowledged to be the British parliamentarian and political writer Edmund Burke, whose Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) was a forceful expression of conservatives’ rejection of the French Revolution and a major inspiration for counterrevolutionary theorists in the 19th century. For Burke and other pro-parliamentarian conservatives, the violent, untraditional, and uprooting methods of the revolution outweighed and corrupted its liberating ideals. The general revulsion against the violent course of the revolution provided conservatives with an opportunity to restore pre-Revolutionary traditions, and several brands of conservative philosophy soon developed.

This article discusses the intellectual roots and political history of conservatism from the 18th century to the present. For coverage of conservative ideas in the history of political philosophy, see political philosophy.

Conservative Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary

Conservative Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary

The Britannica Dictionary

mobile search

Home

Ask the Editor

Word of the Day

Quizzes

Core Vocabulary

Browse the Dictionary

×

Britannica Homepage

Ask the Editor

Word of the Day

Quizzes

Core Vocabulary

Browse the Dictionary

The Britannica Dictionary

conservative

2 ENTRIES FOUND:

conservative (adjective)

conservative (noun)

1

conservative

/kənˈsɚvətɪv/

adjective

1

conservative

/kənˈsɚvətɪv/

adjective

Britannica Dictionary definition of CONSERVATIVE

[more conservative; most conservative]

:

believing in the value of established and traditional practices in politics and society

:

relating to or supporting political conservatism

a conservative newspaper columnist

conservative politicians/policies

She is a liberal Democrat who married a conservative Republican.

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

compare 1liberal

Conservative

:

of or relating to the conservative party in countries like the United Kingdom and Canada

Conservative voters/policies

the Conservative candidate

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

[more conservative; most conservative]

:

not liking or accepting changes or new ideas

He had some pretty conservative [=traditional, conventional] ideas about the way life should be.

She's more conservative now than she was in college.

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

[more conservative; most conservative]

— used to describe a guess, estimate, etc., that is probably lower than the actual amount will be

He gave me a conservative estimate of how much repairs will cost.

She predicts that the total cost will be around 500 dollars, and that's a conservative guess. [=the total cost will probably be higher than that]

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

[more conservative; most conservative]

:

traditional in taste, style, or manners

Her taste in art is fairly conservative.

He is a conservative dresser.

a conservative suit

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

[more conservative; most conservative]

:

not willing to take risks

a conservative investor

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

or

Conservative

:

accepting and following many of the traditional beliefs and customs of a religion

Conservative Judaism

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

— conservatively

adverb

The collection is conservatively valued at three million dollars.

He dresses conservatively.

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

2

conservative

/kənˈsɚvətɪv/

noun

plural

conservatives

2

conservative

/kənˈsɚvətɪv/

noun

plural

conservatives

Britannica Dictionary definition of CONSERVATIVE

[count]

:

a person who believes in the value of established and traditional practices in politics and society

:

a person who is politically conservative

His message is being well received by conservatives.

[+] more examples

[-] hide examples

[+] Example sentences

[-] Hide examples

compare 2liberal

Conservative

:

a member or supporter of a conservative political party in countries like the United Kingdom and Canada

ASK THE EDITOR

If I say,"My father was a doctor," does this mean that he is no longer living, or that he changed his career?

See the answer »

QUIZZES

Vocabulary Quiz

Test your word power

Take the Quiz »

Name That Thing

Take our visual quiz

Test Your Knowledge »

WORD OF THE DAY

lethargic

: feeling a lack of energy

Learn More »

About Us & Legal Info

Partner Program

Contact Us

Privacy Notice

Terms of Use

Pronunciation Symbols

Help

© 2024 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

CONSERVATIVE Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com

CONSERVATIVE Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com

GamesDaily CrosswordWord PuzzleWord FinderAll gamesFeaturedWord of the DaySynonym of the DayWord of the YearNew wordsLanguage storiesAll featuredPop cultureSlangEmojiMemesAcronymsGender and sexualityAll pop cultureWriting tipsGrammar Coach™Writing hubGrammar essentialsCommonly confusedAll writing tipsGamesFeaturedPop cultureWriting tipsconservative[ kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv ]show ipaSee synonyms for: conservativeconservativelyconservativeness on Thesaurus.comadjectivedisposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit.(often initial capital letter) of or relating to the Conservative party.(initial capital letter) of, relating to, or characteristic of Conservative Jews or Conservative Judaism.having the power or tendency to conserve or preserve.Mathematics. (of a vector or vector function) having curl equal to zero; irrotational; lamellar.See morenouna person who is conservative in principles, actions, habits, etc.a supporter of conservative political policies.(initial capital letter) a member of a conservative political party, especially the Conservative party in Great Britain.a preservative.See moreOrigin of conservative1First recorded in 1350–1400; from Late Latin conservātīvus, equivalent to Latin conservāt(us) (see conservation) + -īvus -ive; replacing Middle English conservatif, from Middle French, from Latin, as aboveOther words from conservativecon·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbcon·serv·a·tive·ness, nounan·ti·con·serv·a·tive, adjective, nounan·ti·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverban·ti·con·serv·a·tive·ness, nounhalf-con·serv·a·tive, adjectivehalf-con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbhy·per·con·serv·a·tive, adjective, nounhy·per·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbhy·per·con·serv·a·tive·ness, nounnon·con·ser·va·tive, adjective, nouno·ver·con·serv·a·tive, adjectiveo·ver·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbo·ver·con·serv·a·tive·ness, nounpseu·do·con·serv·a·tive, adjectivepseu·do·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbqua·si-con·serv·a·tive, adjectivequa·si-con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbsem·i·con·serv·a·tive, adjectivesem·i·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbsu·per·con·serv·a·tive, adjectivesu·per·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbsu·per·con·serv·a·tive·ness, nounun·con·serv·a·tive, adjectiveun·con·serv·a·tive·ly, adverbun·con·serv·a·tive·ness, nounWords Nearby conservativeconservation of massconservation of momentumconservation of parityconservation statusconservatismconservativeConservative BaptistConservative JewConservative JudaismConservative partyconservatizeDictionary.com Unabridged

Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2024How to use conservative in a sentenceLiberals say things that are way out there, and conservatives say things that are sometimes way out there, or don’t have enough evidence.Pro-Trump youth group enlists teens in secretive campaign likened to a ‘troll farm,’ prompting rebuke by Facebook and Twitter | Isaac Stanley-Becker | September 15, 2020 | Washington PostDavid Graff, Senior Director, Trust & Safety at Google, said around the elections specifically but also around some other areas, Google is going to take a more conservative approach with what suggestions it shows in auto-complete.Google now uses BERT to match stories with fact checks | Barry Schwartz | September 10, 2020 | Search Engine LandThe thinking was the South Bronx was too conservative to elect an LGBTQ person…Not only did I win, but I won so decisively that it sent Ruben Diaz Sr.Ritchie Torres, set to be first out Afro-Latino in Congress, seeks big changes amid COVID | Chris Johnson | September 9, 2020 | Washington BladeWhat conservative parents who opposed this are arguing is to rewrite history and we are arguing to teach history as it happened.LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum laws take effect in N.J., Ill. | Philip Van Slooten | September 9, 2020 | Washington BladeIn fact, there’s scant evidence of systematic anti-right bias by social-media platforms, according to two analyses by The Economist and a third by a researcher at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.Why the most controversial US internet law is worth saving | Amy Nordrum | September 9, 2020 | MIT Technology ReviewPlus the GOP electorate has become more conservative since 2008.The Devil in Mike Huckabee | Dean Obeidallah | January 6, 2015 | THE DAILY BEASTThat Huckabee is mentioned in the same sentence with other aspiring conservative governors, especially Bobby Jindal, is laughable.Why This Liberal Hearts Huckabee | Sally Kohn | January 6, 2015 | THE DAILY BEASTA hundred ultra-wealthy liberal and conservative donors have taken over the political system.The 100 Rich People Who Run America | Mark McKinnon | January 5, 2015 | THE DAILY BEASTA colleague overheard two conservative Mass. lawmakers talking about what “the gays” could do.The Real Story Behind the Fight for Marriage Equality | E.J. Graff | December 30, 2014 | THE DAILY BEASTThe disbelief was evident in article after article, with one conservative site using “President Pinocchio” in its headline.Obama Is Right on Race. The Media Is Wrong. | Keli Goff | December 29, 2014 | THE DAILY BEASTThe conservative senate sent a deputation to Bonaparte, expressing their desire that he would accept the title of emperor.The Every Day Book of History and Chronology | Joel MunsellThe man called Shiv was driving Delancy's get-away car at a conservative pace so as not to excite suspicion.Hooded Detective, Volume III No. 2, January, 1942 | VariousWho was it but its founder, that led the conservative party through these successive stages of triumph?Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, No. CCCXXXIX. January, 1844. Vol. LV. | VariousIt was one of the conservative sheets, comic-less, reactionary Republican to the core.Hooded Detective, Volume III No. 2, January, 1942 | VariousIn politics he took the conservative side, but as regards music he was probably the most advanced radical in Moscow.The Life & Letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky | Modeste TchaikovskySee More ExamplesBritish Dictionary definitions for conservative (1 of 2)conservative/ (kənˈsɜːvətɪv) /adjectivefavouring the preservation of established customs, values, etc, and opposing innovationof, characteristic of, or relating to conservatismtending to be moderate or cautious: a conservative estimateconventional in style or type: a conservative suitmed (of treatment) designed to alleviate symptoms: Compare radical (def. 4)physics a field of force, system, etc, in which the work done moving a body from one point to another is independent of the path taken between them: electrostatic fields of force are conservativeSee morenouna person who is reluctant to change or consider new ideas; conformista supporter or advocate of conservatismadjective, nouna less common word for preservativeDerived forms of conservativeconservatively, adverbconservativeness, nounBritish Dictionary definitions for Conservative (2 of 2)Conservative/ (kənˈsɜːvətɪv) /adjective(in Britain, Canada, and elsewhere)of, supporting, or relating to a Conservative Partyof, relating to, or characterizing Conservative Judaismnouna supporter or member of a Conservative PartyCollins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition

© William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins

Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012Cultural definitions for conservativeconservativeA descriptive term for persons, policies, and beliefs associated with conservatism.The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition

Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.Browse#aabbccddeeffgghhiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzzAboutCareersShopContact usAdvertise with usCookies, terms, & privacyDo not sell my infoFollow usGet the Word of the Day every day!Sign upBy clicking "Sign Up", you are accepting Dictionary.com Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policies.My account© 2024 Dictionary.com, LLC

Conservatism in the United States - Wikipedia

Conservatism in the United States - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Search

Search

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1Overview

Toggle Overview subsection

1.1Types

1.2Ideology and political philosophy

1.3Social views

1.4Economic views

1.5Views on foreign policy

2History

Toggle History subsection

2.1John Adams

2.2Classical liberalism

2.3Veterans organizations

2.4School prayer debate

2.5Reagan Era

321st-century policies

Toggle 21st-century policies subsection

3.1The environment

3.2Law and order

3.3Economics

3.4Social issues

3.5Race and culture

3.6Reaction to liberalism

4Electoral politics

Toggle Electoral politics subsection

4.1Geography

5Other topics

Toggle Other topics subsection

5.1Russell Kirk's principles of conservatism

5.2Courts

5.2.1Originalism

5.2.2Federalism

5.3Semantics, language, and media

5.3.1Socialism

5.4Modern media

5.5Science and academia

5.5.1Attitudes towards science

5.5.2Admission to academia

5.5.3Relativism versus absolutism

6Historiography

Toggle Historiography subsection

6.1American exceptionalism

7Past thinkers and leaders

Toggle Past thinkers and leaders subsection

7.1The Giants of American Conservatism

8See also

9References

10Further reading

Toggle Further reading subsection

10.1Historiography and memory

11External links

Toggle the table of contents

Conservatism in the United States

24 languages

العربيةDanskDeutschΕλληνικάEspañolفارسیFrançais한국어ՀայերենHrvatskiItalianoNederlands日本語Norsk bokmålPortuguêsRomânăРусскийSimple EnglishСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиTürkçeTiếng Việtייִדיש中文

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadEditView history

Tools

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadEditView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

In other projects

Wikimedia Commons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"American conservative" redirects here. For the magazine, see The American Conservative.

This article is part of a series onConservatismin the United States

Schools

Compassionate

Fiscal

Fusion

Libertarian

Moderate

Movement

Neo

Paleo

Progressive

Social

Traditionalist

Principles

American exceptionalism

Anti-communism

Christian nationalism

Classical liberalism

Constitutionalism

Family values

Judeo-Christian values

Limited government

Militarism

Moral absolutism

Natural law

Patriotism

Republicanism

Right to bear arms

Rule of law

Tradition

History

Conservative coalition

Conservative Democrat

Conservative Manifesto

Loyalists

McCarthyism

Modern timeline

New Right

Old Right

Overview

Reagan Doctrine

Reaganomics

Stalwart Republicans

Southern Agrarians

Intellectuals

Babbitt

Boorstin

Bozell Jr.

Buchanan

Buckley

Burnham

Chambers

Dolan

Eliot

George

Goldberg

Gottfried

Hanson

Hazony

Hoppe

Jaffa

Kirk

Kirkpatrick

Kreeft

Kristol (Bill)

Kristol (Irving)

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Laffer

Lasch

Lodge

Lovecraft

Lukacs

Mansfield

Meese

Meyer

Nisbet

Nock

Podhoretz

Ransom

Santayana

Sowell

Strauss

Viereck

Voegelin

Washington

Weaver

Will

Politicians

Abbott

Adams

Quincy Adams

Agnew

Buchanan

Bush (George H. W.)

Bush (George W.)

Cantor

Cheney (Dick)

Cheney (Liz)

Clay

Cleveland

Coolidge

Cruz

DeSantis

Dole

Fillmore

Forbes

Gingrich

Goldwater

Graham

Haley

Hamilton

Harding

Hawley

Helms

Hoover

Huckabee

Johnson

Jordan

Lodge

Luce

Massie

McCain

McCarthy (Joseph)

McCarthy (Kevin)

McConnell

McDonald

Meadows

Nixon

Palin

Paul (Rand)

Paul (Ron)

Pence

Quayle

Reagan

Romney

Rubio

Rumsfeld

Ryan

Santorum

Scalise

Scott (Rick)

Scott (Tim)

Sessions

Seymour

Sherman

Taft (Robert)

Taft (William)

Thurmond

Tilden

Trump

Vance

Wolfowitz

Jurists

Alito

Barrett

Bork

Burger

Butler

Colson

Goldsmith

Gorsuch

Harlan II

Kavanaugh

Leo

Meese

Parker

Rehnquist

Scalia

Sessions

Sanford

Sutherland

Van Devanter

Taft

Thomas

Yoo

Commentators

Bannon

Beck

Bartiromo

Bongino

Breitbart

Buchanan

Buckley

Carlson

Coulter

Crowder

D'Souza

Dreher

Drudge

Elder

Grant

Hannity

Hodgetwins

Huckabee

Ingraham

Jones

Kirk

Klavan

Knowles

Krauthammer

Lahren

Levin

Limbaugh

North

Novak

O'Reilly

Owens

Palin

Peterson

Podhoretz

Prager

Robertson

Rubin

Santorum

Schlafly

Shapiro

Tatum

Walsh

Watters

Weyrich

White

Will

Woods

Activists

Bozell III

Dobson

Falwell

Feulner

Gabriel

Graham

Horowitz

Kirk

LaHaye (Beverly)

LaHaye (Tim)

Owens

Park

Prager

Reed

Rufo

Schlafly (Andrew)

Schlafly (Phyllis)

Shapiro

Thiel

Washington

Weyrich

Wurzelbacher

Works

Democracy and Leadership (1924)

Our Enemy, the State (1935)

Ideas Have Consequences (1948)

God and Man at Yale (1951)

The Conservative Mind (1953)

The Conscience of a Conservative (1960)

A Choice Not an Echo (1964)

Roots of American Order (1974)

A Conflict of Visions (1987)

The Closing of the American Mind (1987)

A Republic, Not an Empire (1999)

Hillbilly Elegy (2017)

The Benedict Option (2017)

The Right Side of History (2019)

PartiesActive

American Party

American Independent Party

Conservative Party of New York State

Constitution Party

Reform Party

Republican Party

Defunct

Anti-Masonic Party

Constitutional Union Party

Federalist Party

Law and Order Party of Rhode Island

National Republican Party

Native American Party

Whig Party

Think tanks

Acton Institute

Alexis de Tocqueville Institution

American Enterprise Institute

American Compass

Center for Security Policy

Center for the National Interest

Charles Koch Institute

Claremont Institute

Competitive Enterprise Institute

David Horowitz Freedom Center

Discovery Institute

Ethics and Public Policy Center

Family Research Institute

Gatestone Institute

Heartland Institute

The Heritage Foundation

Hoover Institution

Hudson Institute

Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Leadership Institute

Manhattan Institute

Mises Institute

Pacific Research Institute

Project for the New American Century

Ripon Society

R Street Institute

Rockford Institute

State Policy Network

Tax Foundation

Other organizations

Economics

American Liberty League

Americans for Tax Reform

Club for Growth

Freedom Partners

FreedomWorks

John M. Olin Foundation

National Federation of Independent Business

National Taxpayers Union

Tea Party Patriots

United States Chamber of Commerce

Gun rights

Gun Owners of America

National Rifle Association

Second Amendment Caucus

Identity politics

ACT for America

Concerned Women for America

Council of Conservative Citizens

Independent Women's Forum

Log Cabin Republicans

Nationalism

Federation for American Immigration Reform

Liberty Lobby

NumbersUSA

Oath Keepers

Religion

Alliance Defending Freedom

American Center for Law & Justice

American Family Association

The American TFP

Arlington Group

Chalcedon Foundation

Christian Coalition of America

Christian Voice

Eagle Forum

Family Research Council

The Fellowship

Focus on the Family

Foundation for Moral Law

Liberty Counsel

Moral Majority

National Organization for Marriage

National Right to Life Committee

Parents Television and Media Council

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America

Thomas More Law Center

Traditional Values Coalition

Watchdog groups

Judicial Watch

Media Research Center

Youth/student groups

Turning Point USA

Young America's Foundation

Young Americans for Liberty

Youth for Western Civilization

Miscellaneous

American Conservative Union

The Conservative Caucus

Council for National Policy

Faith and Freedom Coalition

Freedom Caucus

John Birch Society

National Conservative PAC

Philadelphia Society

Republican Study Committee

Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal

Other

ConservAmerica

Federalist Society

Pacific Justice Institute

Regnery Publishing

Republican Main Street Partnership

Media

Newspapers

Chicago Tribune

Dallas Morning News

The Epoch Times

New Hampshire Union Leader

New York Observer

New York Post

The Spotlight

The Wall Street Journal (editorial board)

The Washington Times

Journals

American Affairs

The American Conservative

The American Spectator

American Thinker

City Journal

Claremont Review of Books

Commentary

Chronicles

The Dispatch

First Things

The Imaginative Conservative

Jewish World Review

Modern Age

National Affairs

The National Interest

National Review

The New American

The New Criterion

Newsmax

Policy Review

Spectator USA

Washington Examiner

The Weekly Standard

TV channels

CBN

Fox Business

Fox News

Newsmax TV

One America News Network

Websites

Babylon Bee

Breitbart News

The Bulwark

Campus Reform

Conservative Review

Daily Caller

Daily Signal

Daily Wire

Drudge Report

The Federalist

FrontPage Magazine

Gateway Pundit

Human Events

Independent Journal Review

InfoWars

Jihad Watch

LifeZette

NewsBusters

PJ Media

Rare

RedState

Taki's Magazine

Townhall

TruthRevolt

Twitchy

Washington Examiner

The Washington Free Beacon

The Western Journal

WorldNetDaily

Other

Alternative media

Blaze Media

PragerU

RSBN

The Rubin Report

Sinclair Broadcast Group

Variants and movements

Asian and Pacific Islander

Black

Christian right

Dark Enlightenment

Female

Green

LGBT

Libertarian Republicans

Militia movement

Patriot movement

Radical Right

Tea Party movement

Trumpism

Christian

See also

American nationalism

Barstool conservatism

Bibliography

Conservative talk radio

CPAC

Founding Fathers

Libertarianism

List

Prominent people

Political parties

 Conservatism portal

 United States portalvte

Part of a series onConservatism

Variants

Authoritarian

Corporatist

Cultural

Fiscal

Green

Liberal

Libertarian

Moderate

National

Paternalistic

Populist

Pragmatic

Progressive

Reactionary

Religious

Social

Traditionalist

Ultra

Principles

Ancestral worship

Authority

Traditional

Class collaboration

Convention

Cultural heritage

Culture of life

Pro-Life

Custom

Discipline

Duty

Elitism

Aristocracy

Meritocracy

Noblesse oblige

Ethical order

Familialism

Family values

Fundamentalism

Gender roles

Complementarianism

Historism

Honour

Imperialism

Law and order

Loyalty

Maternalism

Monarchism

Royalism

Ordered liberty

Organicism

Orthodoxy

Patriotism

 Property rights

Public morality

Social hierarchy

Social institutions

Social norms

Social order

Sovereignty

Stewardship

Subsidiarity

Tradition

Intellectuals

Johnson

Hume

Burke

More

Maistre

Bonald

Haller

Chateaubriand

Coleridge

Karamzin

Savigny

Newman

Tocqueville

Cortés

Taine

Le Bon

Belloc

Iorga

Chesterton

Spengler

Savarkar

Schmitt

Jünger

Evola

Strauss

Röpke

Oakeshott

Burnham

Lefebvre

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

Gómez Dávila

Kirk

Koselleck

Buckley

Sowell

Mansfield

Scruton

Hitchens

Works

Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

Considerations on France (1796)

Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism (1798)

The Genius of Christianity (1802)

On the Pope (1819)

Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)

Democracy in America (1835)

The Concept of the Political (1932)

The Conservative Mind (1953)

The Conscience of a Conservative (1960)

How to Be a Conservative (2014)

Politicians

Adams

Pitt

Canning

Metternich

Disraeli

Bismarck

Salisbury

Dmowski

Mannerheim

Baldwin

Maurras

Horthy

Metaxas

Churchill

Adenauer

De Gasperi

Chiang

Salazar

De Gaulle

Dollfuss

Franco

Reagan

Powell

Pinochet

Marcos

Park

Smith

Suharto

Lee

Thatcher

Kohl

Fujimori

Trump

Netanyahu

Modi

Bolsonaro

Orbán

Meloni

Organizations

Centrist Democrat International

European Conservatives and ReformistsParty

European People's Party

Identity and Democracy

International Democrat Union

Muslim Brotherhood

Tradition, Family, Property

Religion

Anglo-Catholicism

Christian right

Clericalism

Confucianism

Conservative Christianity

Hindutva

Islamism

Jewish conservatism

Religious Zionism

Traditionalist Catholicism

Integralism

Ultramontanism

Traditionalist School

Perennialism

Personal variants

Berlusconism

Cameronism

Chiangism

Erdoğanism

Francoism

Fujimorism

Gaullism

Janismo

Maurrassisme

Mellismo

Metaxism

Powellism

Pinochetism

Putinism

Reaganism

Sarkozysm

Thatcherism

Trumpism

National variants

Australia

Austria

Bangladesh

Belgium

Belize

Brazil

Canada

Colombia

Cuba

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Guatemala

Hong Kong

Iceland

India

Italy

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Pakistan

Peru

Panama

Russia

Serbia

Singapore

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

South Korea

Taiwan

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

United States

Historical background

Ancien Régime

Bourbon Restauration

Congress of Vienna

Conservative Order

Counter-Enlightenment

Counter-revolution

German Romanticism

Holy Alliance

Ultra-royalism

White Terror

Related ideologies

Agrarianism

Christian democracy

Clerical fascism

Communitarianism

Conservative liberalism

Corporatism

Ordoliberalism

Related topics

Anti-communism

Anti-gender movement

Black conservatism

United States

Catholic social teaching

Conservative feminism

Conservative wave

Hispanic conservatism

United States

LGBT conservatism

Nativism

Neoauthoritarianism (China)

Patriarchy

Right realism

Right-wing politics

Authoritarianism

Far

New

Radical

Small-c conservative

Toryism

 Conservatism portal

 Politics portalvte

In the United States, conservatism is based on a belief in limited government, individualism, traditionalism, republicanism, and limited federal governmental power in relation to U.S. states.[1] Conservative and Christian media organizations, along with American conservative figures, are influential, and American conservatism is one of the majority political ideologies within the Republican Party.[2][3][4]

American conservatives tend to support Christian values,[5] moral absolutism,[6] traditional family values,[7] and American exceptionalism,[8] while opposing abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage, and transgender rights.[9] They tend to favor economic liberalism and neoliberalism,[10][11] and are generally pro-business and pro-capitalism,[12][13] while opposing communism and labor unions.[14][15][16] They often advocate for a strong national defense, gun rights, capital punishment, and a defense of Western culture from perceived threats posed by communism and moral relativism.[17][18] 21st-century American conservatives tend to question epidemiology, climate change, and evolution more frequently than moderates or liberals.[19][20][21]

Overview[edit]

In the United States today, conservative is often used very differently from the way it is used in Europe and Asia. Following the American Revolution, Americans rejected the core ideals of European conservatism; those ideals were based on the landed aristocracy, hereditary monarchy, established churches, and powerful armies.

American conservatives generally consider individual liberty within the bounds of conservative values as the fundamental trait of democracy.[22][23] They typically believe in a balance between federal government and states' rights. Apart from some right-libertarians, American conservatives tend to favor strong action in areas they believe to be within government's legitimate jurisdiction, particularly national defense and law enforcement. Social conservatives—many of them religious—often oppose abortion and same-sex marriage. They often favor prayer in public schools and government funding for private religious schools.[24][25][7][26]

Like most political ideologies in the United States, conservatism originates from republicanism, which rejects aristocratic and monarchical government and upholds the principles of the 1776 U.S. Declaration of Independence ("that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness") and of the U.S. Constitution, which established a federal republic under the rule of law. Conservative philosophy also derives in part from the classical liberal tradition of the 18th and 19th centuries, which advocated laissez-faire economics (i.e. economic freedom and deregulation).[27][28] However, in the twenty-first century, two-thirds of Southern Republicans favor seceding from the United States.[29]

While historians such as Patrick Allitt (born 1956) and political theorists such as Russell Kirk (1918–1994) assert that conservative principles have played a major role in U.S. politics and culture since 1776, they also argue that an organized conservative movement with beliefs that differ from those of other American political parties did not emerge in the U.S. at least until the 1950s.[30][31][32] The recent movement conservatism has its base in the Republican Party, which has adopted conservative policies since the 1950s; Southern Democrats also became important early figures in the movement's history.[33][34][35][36]

In 1937, conservative Republicans and Southern Democrats formed the congressional conservative coalition, which played an influential role in Congress from the late 1930s to the mid-1960s. In recent decades, Southern conservatives voted heavily Republican.

Types[edit]

See also: Factions in the Republican Party (United States)

Conservatism in the United States is not a single school of thought.[37] Barry Goldwater in the 1960s spoke for a "free enterprise" conservatism. Jerry Falwell in the 1980s preached traditional moral and religious social values.

The history of American conservatism has been marked by tensions and competing ideologies, but at least during the era of Ronald Reagan,[38] a coalition of ideologies was formed that was known as "the Three Leg Stool" — the three legs being social conservatives (consisting of the Christian right and paleo-conservatives), war hawks (consisting of interventionists and neoconservatives), and fiscal conservatives (consisting of right-libertarians and free-market capitalists), with overlap between the sides.[39][40][41]

In the 21st century United States, types of conservatism include:

Christian conservatism, whose proponents are primarily Christian fundamentalists focused on the traditional nuclear family rooted in religion. Typical positions include the view that the United States was founded as a Christian nation rather than a secular one and that abortion should be restricted or outlawed. Many attack the profanity and sexuality prevalent in modern media and society and often oppose pornography and LGBT rights while supporting abstinence-only sex education.[42] This faction strongly supported Reagan in the 1980 election. Nevertheless, they intensely opposed the Reagan's 1981 nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court because she supported a woman's right to abortion. She was confirmed unanimously anyway.[43]

Related to Christian conservatism is Social conservatism, which focuses on the preservation of traditional moral values, often rooted in the nuclear family and religion, that they see as threatened by secularism and moral relativism. They tend to support prayer in public schools and school vouchers for religious schools, while opposing abortion and LGBT rights.[44][45][46][9][47]

Constitutional conservatism, a form of conservatism bound within the limits provided within the United States Constitution, defending the structures of constitutionalism and enumerated powers, and preserving the principles of the United States Constitution.[48] Chief among those principles is the defense of liberty.[49] This form of conservatism coalesced in the Republican Party in the early 20th century, in opposition to progressivism within the party; it can also be seen being influential to the 21st century Tea Party movement.[50][51] Constitutional conservatism has also been associated with judicial originalism.[52][53][54]

Fiscal conservatism, a form of conservatism that focuses on low taxes and restrained government spending.

Libertarian conservatism, a fusion with libertarianism. This type emphasizes a strict interpretation of the Constitution, particularly with regard to federal power. Libertarian conservatism is constituted by a broad, sometimes conflicted, coalition including pro-business social moderates, so-called "deficit hawks", those favoring more rigid enforcement of states' rights, individual liberty activists, and many of those who place their socially liberal ideology ahead of their fiscal beliefs. This mode of thinking tends to espouse laissez-faire economics and a critical view of the federal government, its surveillance programs and its foreign military interventions. Libertarian conservatives' emphasis on personal freedom often leads them to have social positions contrary to those of social conservatives, especially on such issues as marijuana, abortion and gay marriage. Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul have been influential proponents in the Republican presidential contests, while still maintaining many socially conservative values.[55] Fiscal conservatives and libertarians favor capitalism, individualism, limited government, and laissez-faire economics. They advocate low taxes, free markets, deregulation, privatization, and reduced government spending and government debt.[27][28]

National conservatism, a modern variant of conservatism and nationalism that concentrates on upholding national and cultural identity.[56] Advocated by supporters of President Donald Trump that breaks with the "conservative consensus, forged by Cold War politics" of "markets and moralism".[57] It seeks to preserve national interests, emphasizes American nationalism, strict law and order policies[58] and social conservatism (revolving around the nuclear family),[57] opposes illegal immigration and supports laissez-faire or free market economic policy.[59] A 2019 political conference featuring "public figures, journalists, scholars, and students" dubbed this variety of conservatism "National Conservatism".[60] Critics allege its adherents are merely attempting to wrest "a coherent ideology out of the chaos of the Trumpist moment".[61][62]

Neoconservatism, a modern form of conservatism that supports a more assertive, interventionist foreign policy, aimed at promoting democracy abroad. It is tolerant of an activist government at home, but is focused mostly on international affairs. Neoconservatism was first described by a group of disaffected liberals, and thus Irving Kristol, usually credited as its intellectual progenitor, defined a neoconservative as "a liberal who was mugged by reality". Although originally regarded as an approach to domestic policy (the founding instrument of the movement, Kristol's The Public Interest periodical, did not even cover foreign affairs), through the influence of figures like Dick Cheney, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman and (Irving's son) Bill Kristol, it has become most famous for its association with the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration in the Middle East that used aggressive military action to ostensibly promote democracy and protect American interests.[63][64] Neoconservatives want to expand what they see as American ideals throughout the world.[65]

Paleoconservatism, in part a rebirth of the Old Right arising in the 1980s in reaction to neoconservatism. Paleoconservatives advocate restrictions on immigration, non-interventionist foreign policy, and opposition to multiculturalism.[66] Most conservative factions nationwide, except some libertarians, support a unilateral foreign policy, and a strong military. Most, especially libertarians, support gun ownership rights, citing the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The conservative movement of the 1950s attempted to bring together these divergent strands, stressing the need for unity to prevent the spread of "godless communism".[67] It stresses tradition, especially Christian tradition and the importance to society of the traditional family. Some such as Samuel P. Huntington argue that multiracial, multi-ethnic, and egalitarian states are inherently unstable.[68] Paleoconservatives are generally isolationist, and suspicious of foreign influence. The magazines Chronicles and The American Conservative are generally considered to be paleoconservative in nature.[69]

Traditionalist conservatism, a form of conservatism in opposition to rapid change in political and social institutions. This kind of conservatism is anti-ideological insofar as it emphasizes means (slow change) over ends (any particular form of government). To the traditionalist, whether one arrives at a right- or left-wing government is less important than whether change is effected through rule of law rather than through revolution and utopian schemes.[70]

Blue Dog Coalition ideology, the set of values and policy held by most conservative Democrats and the coalition that represents them.[71][72]

Ideology and political philosophy[edit]

William F. Buckley Jr., an author who founded National Review magazine in 1955

In the first 1955 issue of National Review, William F. Buckley Jr. explained the standards of his magazine and helped make explicit the beliefs of American conservatives:[73]

Among our convictions: It is the job of centralized government (in peacetime) to protect its citizens' lives, liberty and property. All other activities of government tend to diminish freedom and hamper progress. The growth of government (the dominant social feature of this century) must be fought relentlessly. In this great social conflict of the era, we are, without reservations, on the libertarian side. The profound crisis of our era is, in essence, the conflict between the Social Engineers, who seek to adjust mankind to scientific utopias, and the disciples of Truth, who defend the organic moral order. We believe that truth is neither arrived at nor illuminated by monitoring election results, binding though these are for other purposes, but by other means, including a study of human experience. On this point we are, without reservations, on the conservative side.

According to Peter Viereck, American conservatism is distinctive because it was not tied to a monarchy, landed aristocracy, established church, or military elite.[74] Instead American conservatives were firmly rooted in American republicanism, which European conservatives opposed. They are committed, says Seymour Martin Lipset, to the belief in America's "superiority against the cold reactionary monarchical and more rigidly status-bound system of European society".[75]

In terms of governmental economic policies, American conservatives have been heavily influenced by the classical liberal or libertarian tradition as expressed by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, and a major source of influence has been the Chicago school of economics. They have been strongly opposed to Keynesian economics.[76][77]

Traditional (Burkean) conservatives tend to be anti-ideological, and some would even say anti-philosophical,[78] promoting, as Russell Kirk explained, a steady flow of "prescription and prejudice". Kirk's use of the word "prejudice" here is not intended to carry its contemporary pejorative connotation: a conservative himself, he believed that the inherited wisdom of the ages may be a better guide than apparently rational individual judgment.

Through much of the 20th century, a primary force uniting the varied strands of conservatism, and uniting conservatives with liberals and socialists, was opposition to communism, which was seen not only as an enemy of the traditional order but also the enemy of Western freedom and democracy. Between 1945 and 1947, it was the Labour government in the United Kingdom, which embraced socialism, that pushed the Truman administration to take a strong stand against Soviet Communism.[79]

Social views[edit]

Main article: Social conservatism in the United States

See also: Bible Belt and Traditionalist conservatism in the United States

Social conservatism in the United States is the defense of traditional family values rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics and the nuclear family.[5][80][81]

There are two overlapping subgroups of social conservatives: the traditional and the religious. Traditional conservatives strongly support traditional codes of conduct, especially those they feel are threatened by social change and modernization. Religious conservatives focus on conducting society based on the morals prescribed by fundamentalist religious authorities, rejecting secularism and moral relativism. In the United States, this translates into hard-line stances on moral issues, such as opposition to abortion, LGBT rights, feminism, pornography, comprehensive sex education, and recreational drug use.

Religious conservatives often assert that America is a Christian nation, calling for laws that enforce Christian morality. They often support school prayer, vouchers for parochial schools, and restricting or outlawing abortion.[7][26][9] Social conservatives are strongest in the Southern "Bible Belt" and in recent years played a major role in the political coalitions of George W. Bush and Donald Trump.[82]

Economic views[edit]

Main articles: Economic liberalism and Fiscal conservatism

Fiscal conservatism has ideological roots in neoliberalism, capitalism, limited government, free enterprise, and laissez-faire economics. Fiscal conservatives typically support tax cuts, reduced government spending, free markets, deregulation, privatization, free trade, minimal government debt, and a balanced budget. They argue that low taxes produce more jobs and wealth for everyone, and, as President Grover Cleveland said, "unnecessary taxation is unjust taxation".[83] A recent movement against the inheritance tax labels such a tax as a "death tax." Fiscal conservatives often argue that competition in the free market is more effective than the regulation of industry and is the most efficient way to promote economic growth. Some make exceptions in the case of trusts or monopolies, or in favor of protectionism instead of free trade. Others, such as some libertarians and followers of Ludwig von Mises, believe all government intervention in the economy is wasteful, corrupt, and immoral.[27][28]

Fiscal conservatism advocates restraint of progressive taxation and expenditure. Fiscal conservatives since the 19th century have argued that debt is a device to corrupt politics; they argue that big spending ruins the morals of the people, and that a national debt creates a dangerous class of speculators. A political strategy employed by conservatives to achieve a smaller government is known as starve the beast. Activist Grover Norquist is a well-known proponent of the strategy and has famously said, "My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub."[84][85] The argument in favor of balanced budgets is often coupled with a belief that government welfare programs should be narrowly tailored and that tax rates should be low, which implies relatively small government institutions.[86]

Views on foreign policy[edit]

Main articles: Neoconservatism and National conservatism

President Ronald Reagan holding a "Stop Communism" t-shirt on the South Lawn of the White House in March 1986

Neoconservatism emphasizes foreign policy over domestic policy. Its supporters, mainly war hawks, advocate a more militaristic, interventionist foreign policy aimed at promoting democracy abroad, which stands in stark contrast to Paleoconservatisms more isolationist foreign policy. Neoconservatives often name communism and Islamism as the biggest threats to the free world.[63] They often oppose the United Nations for interfering with American unilateralism.[87]

National conservatism focuses on upholding national and cultural identity. National conservatives strongly identify with American nationalism, patriotism, and American exceptionalism, while opposing internationalism, globalism, and multiculturalism. The movement seeks to promote national interests through the preservation of traditional cultural values,[57] restrictions on illegal immigration,[59] and strict law and order policies.[58]

History[edit]

Main article: History of conservatism in the United States

In the United States, there has never been a national political party called the Conservative Party.[88] Since 1962, there has been a small Conservative Party of New York State. During Reconstruction in several states in the South in the late 1860s, the former Whigs formed a Conservative Party. They soon merged it into the state Democratic Parties.[89]

All of the major American political parties support republicanism and the basic classical liberal ideals on which the country was founded in 1776, emphasizing liberty, the rule of law, the consent of the governed, and that all men were created equal.[90] Political divisions inside the United States often seemed minor or trivial to Europeans, where the divide between the left and the right led to violent polarization, starting with the French Revolution.[91]

Historian Patrick Allitt expresses the difference between liberal and conservative in terms not of policy but of attitude:

Certain continuities can be traced through American history. The conservative 'attitude' ... was one of trusting to the past, to long-established patterns of thought and conduct, and of assuming that novelties were more likely to be dangerous than advantageous.[92]

No American party has ever advocated traditional European ideals of "conservatism" such as a monarchy, an established church, or a hereditary aristocracy. American conservatism is best characterized as a reaction against utopian ideas of progress[93] and European political philosophy from before the end of World War II.[94] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation".[95][undue weight? – discuss]

In the 2022 book The Right: The Hundred-Year War for American Conservatism, Matthew Continetti noted that the American conservative movement has been fractured for a century.[96]

John Adams[edit]

Main article: John Adams

Political conservatives have emphasized an identification with the Founding Fathers of the United States and the U.S. Constitution.[97] Scholars of conservative political thought "generally label John Adams as the intellectual father of American conservatism".[98] Russell Kirk points to Adams as the key Founding Father for conservatives, saying that "some writers regard him as America's most important conservative public man".[99] Clinton Rossiter writes:

Here was no lover of government by plutocracy, no dreamer of an America filled with factions and hard-packed cities. Here was a man who loved America as it was and had been, one whose life was a doughty testament to the trials and glories of ordered liberty. Here ... was the model of the American conservative.[100]

A. Owen Aldridge places Adams, "At the head of the conservative ranks in the early years of the Republic and Jefferson as the leader of the contrary liberal current."[101] It was a fundamental doctrine for Adams that all men are subject to equal laws of morality. He held that in society all men have a right to equal laws and equal treatment from the government. However, he added, "no two men are perfectly equal in person, property, understanding, activity, and virtue."[102] Peter Viereck commented:

Hamilton, Adams, and their Federalist party sought to establish in the new world what they called a "natural aristocracy". [It was to be] based on property, education, family status, and sense of ethical responsibility. ... Their motive was liberty itself.[103]

Classical liberalism[edit]

Historian Kathleen G. Donohue argues that classical liberalism in the United States during the 19th century had distinctive characteristics as opposed to Britain:

[A]t the center of classical liberal theory [in Europe] was the idea of laissez-faire. To the vast majority of American classical liberals, however, laissez-faire did not mean no government intervention at all. On the contrary, they were more than willing to see government provide tariffs, railroad subsidies, and internal improvements, all of which benefited producers. What they condemned was intervention in behalf of consumers.[104]

Insofar as it is ideological, economic liberalism owes its creation to the classical liberal tradition in the vein of Adam Smith, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, and Ludwig von Mises.[104] Classical liberals supported free markets on moral, ideological grounds: principles of individual liberty morally dictate support for free markets. Supporters of the moral grounds for free markets include Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises. The liberal tradition is suspicious of government authority and prefers individual choice, and hence tends to see free market capitalism as the preferable means of achieving economic ends.[27][28]

Economic liberalism borrows from two schools of thought: the classical liberals' pragmatism and the libertarians' notion of "rights". The classical liberal maintains that free markets work best, while the libertarian contends that free markets are the only ethical markets. A belief in the importance of the civil society is another reason why conservatives support a smaller role for the government in the economy. As noted by Alexis de Tocqueville, there is a belief that a bigger role of the government in the economy will make people feel less responsible for the society. These responsibilities would then need to be taken over by the government, requiring higher taxes. In his book Democracy in America, Tocqueville described this as "soft oppression".[27][28]

Veterans organizations[edit]

An American Legion postcard urging parents to teach religion to their children as a civic duty, c. 1930s

There have been numerous large veterans organizations in American history, most notably the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and the American Legion.[105] They have generally tended to be conservative in politics, with an emphasis on veterans' benefits. The GAR, according to Stuart McConnell, promoted, "a nationalism that honored white, native-stock, middle-class males and ...affirmed a prewar ideal of a virtuous, millennial Republic, based on the independent producer, entrepreneurial capitalism, and the citizen-soldier volunteer".[106] Political conservatism has been an important aspect of the American Legion since its founding in the 1920s.[107] The American Legion always paid very close attention to domestic subversion, especially the threat of domestic communism. However, it paid little attention to foreign affairs before 1945. It ignored the League of Nations and was hostile to the Washington Naval Conference of 1921 that rolled back the naval arms race in the 1920s. Pacifism was popular in the 1920s, and Legion locals ridiculed it and sometimes booed the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. During World War II, it accepted the wartime alliance with Stalin against Nazi Germany. As the Cold War emerged in 1946–1947, the Legion paid increasing attention to an anti-Soviet foreign policy.[108] Its Counter-Subversive Activities Committee in 1946 began publishing the American Legion Firing Line, a newsletter for members which provides information on communist, fascist, and other extremist groups to its subscribers. It warned members against far-right groups such as the John Birch Society and antisemitic groups. By the late 1950s, the newsletter became much more interested in foreign affairs.[109]

The Legion's policy resolutions endorsed large-scale defense spending and the deployment of powerful new weapon systems from the hydrogen bomb in the 1950s to Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative in the 1980s. Harry S. Truman was the first Legionnaire to occupy the White House, but he came under Legion attack for waging a limited war in Korea and not following the advice of General Douglas MacArthur in attacking China. By 1961, the Legion outright rejected the policy of containment, and called for the liberation of the captive peoples in Eastern Europe. The Legion publications typically hailed Barry Goldwater, a member, as a political role model, but like Goldwater and William F. Buckley, they rejected the extremism of the John Birch Society. The Legion supported increased intervention in Vietnam and support of anti-Communist forces in Central America and Afghanistan. The Legion never saw much benefit in the United Nations, and like other conservatives worried about a loss of American sovereignty to international bodies. The collapse of Soviet-style communism in Eastern Europe and in Russia itself saw the American Legion looking to new venues for militaristic action. It praised President George H. W. Bush's intervention in Kuwait against Iraq in 1990. After the September 11 attacks, it vigorously endorsed President George W. Bush's strategy of a global war on terror, and it supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003.[110]

School prayer debate[edit]

In 1962, the Supreme Court Engel v. Vitale decision banned state-written prayers in public schools. White evangelicals mostly supported that decision. However, they saw the 1963 Abington School District v. Schempp decision to ban school-sponsored Bible reading and school-organized praying of the Lord's Prayer from those schools as an affront. The Supreme Court ruled that prayer organized by the school was not voluntary since students were coerced or publicly embarrassed if they did not follow along. Nevertheless, the conservatives continued to call for voluntary school prayer, which is already protected under law, and repeatedly attacked the Supreme Court on this issue and on other issues, especially abortion. The evangelicals had long been avid supporters of the public schools. Now they had to reconsider their place in both schools and society as a whole. They concluded with surprising unanimity that those school decisions had done more than forced evangelical belief out of America's public schools; the decisions had pushed evangelicals themselves out of America's mainstream culture. Alienated, they moved into the religious right and by 1980 were avid supporters of Ronald Reagan.[111][112][113]

Reagan Era[edit]

Ronald Reagan gives a televised address from the Oval Office, outlining his plan for tax reductions in July 1981 (excerpt).

The archetypal free market conservative administrations of the late 20th century—the Margaret Thatcher government in Britain and the Ronald Reagan administration in the U.S.—both held unfettered operation of the market to be the cornerstone of contemporary modern conservatism.[114] To that end, Thatcher privatized industries and public housing, and Reagan cut the maximum capital gains tax from 28% to 20%, though in his second term he agreed to raise it back up to 28%. Reagan also cut individual income-tax rates, lowering the maximum rate from 70% to 28%. He increased defense spending, but liberal Democrats blocked his efforts to cut domestic spending.[115] Reagan did not control the rapid increase in federal government spending or reduce the deficit, but his record looks better when expressed as a percent of the gross domestic product. Federal revenues as a percent of the GDP fell from 19.6% in 1981 when Reagan took office to 18.3% in 1989 when he left. Federal spending fell slightly from 22.2% of the GDP to 21.2%. This contrasts with statistics from 2004, when government spending was rising more rapidly than it had in decades.[116]

President Ronald Reagan set the conservative standard in the 1980s. By the 2010s, the Republican leaders typically claimed fealty to it. For example, most of the Republican candidates in 2012 "claimed to be standard bearers of Reagan's ideological legacy".[117] Reagan solidified Republican strength by uniting its fiscal conservatives, social conservatives, and national conservatives into a conservative coalition. He did so with tax cuts, continued deregulation, a greatly increased military budget, a policy of rollback of Communism (as opposed to just containing it), and appeals to family values and religious morality. The 1980s and beyond became known as the Reagan Era.[118] Typically, conservative politicians and spokesmen in the 21st century proclaim their devotion to Reagan's ideals and policies on most social, economic, and foreign policy issues.[citation needed]

21st-century policies[edit]

According to conservative academic Sean Speer, the most important developments within the 21st century American conservative movement include the rise of Donald Trump and right-wing populism more broadly, an emerging movement within conservatism that is opposed to both post-Cold War neoliberalism and liberalism more broadly, the return of competition between great powers and a possible new Cold War with China, a generational change within conservatism causing a renewed emphasis on identity and culture among younger conservative figures, the rise of social media platforms causing a fragmentation of traditional media platforms, and mainstream institutions being increasingly dominated by progressives promoting identity politics or "wokeism."[96] Speer adds that these developments have caused "an erosion of the conservative consensus involving free markets, social conservatism, and a hawkish foreign policy (sometimes described as "fusionism") that provided the intellectual scaffolding for American conservatism essentially from the launch of National Review magazine in the mid-1950s to the second term of George W. Bush's presidency."[96]

Long-term shifts in American conservative thinking following the election of Trump have been described as a "new fusionism" of traditional conservative ideology and right-wing populist themes.[119] These have resulted in shifts towards greater support of national conservatism,[120] protectionism,[121] cultural conservatism, a more realist foreign policy, a conspiracist sub-culture, a repudiation of neoconservatism, reduced efforts to roll back entitlement programs, and a disdain for traditional checks and balances.[119]

The environment[edit]

See also: Climate change denial

Many modern conservatives oppose environmentalism. Conservative beliefs often include global warming denial and opposition towards government action to combat it, which conservatives contend would do severe economic damage and ultimately more harm than good even if one accepts the premise that human activity is contributing to climate change.[122][123] However, many conservatives, such as former Mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, promote using nuclear fission power over renewable energy sources.[124][125] Among conservatives who do support government intervention to prevent climate change, they generally prefer market-based policies such as a carbon tax over blanket bans and regulation.

In the past, conservatives have supported conservation efforts, from the protection of the Yosemite Valley, to the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency.[126] However, more recently, conservatives have opposed environmentalism, often ridiculing environmentalists as "tree huggers". Republican Party leaders such as Newt Gingrich and Michele Bachmann advocate the abolition of the EPA, calling it "the job-killing organization of America."[127]

Conservative think tanks since the 1990s have opposed the concept of man-made global warming; challenged scientific evidence; publicized what they perceived as beneficial aspects of global warming, and asserted that proposed remedies would do more harm than good.[128] The concept of anthropogenic global warming continues to be an ongoing debate among conservatives in the United States,[129] but most conservatives reject the scientific consensus that climate change is caused by humans. A 2019 poll showed that fewer than 25% of Republicans believed humans were involved in causing global warming.[130]

American conservatives have generally supported deregulation of pollution and reduced restrictions on carbon emissions.[131] Similarly, they have advocated increased oil drilling with less regulatory interference, including oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.[132] In the 2008 election, the phrase, "Drill baby drill" was used to express the Republican position on the subject.[133]

President Donald Trump rolled back over 100 Obama-administration rules regarding the environment. President Trump also announced that the U.S. would stop making payments to the United Nations program "Green Climate Fund".[134]

Law and order[edit]

Russell Kirk, conservative theorist

Conservatives generally support a strong policy of law and order to control crime, including long jail terms for repeat offenders. Most support the death penalty for particularly egregious crimes. Conservatives often oppose criminal justice reform, including efforts to combat racial profiling, police brutality, mass incarceration, and the War on drugs. They deny that racism exists in the criminal justice system, often opposing organizations such as Black Lives Matter, which they view as anti-police groups.[135] To conservatives, police officers are reacting to violent situations in a rational way, and have been the victims of unfair discrimination. The "law and order" issue was a major factor weakening liberalism in the 1960s.[136]

Conservatives tend to be opposed to immigration, particularly illegal immigration.[137]

Economics[edit]

American conservative discourse generally opposes a social market economy, due to opposing the welfare state. In this view, government programs that seek to provide services and opportunities for the poor encourages laziness and dependence while reducing self-reliance and personal responsibility. Conservatives typically hold that the government should play a smaller role in regulating business and managing the economy. They typically support economic liberalization and oppose welfare programs to redistribute income to assist the poor. Such efforts, they argue, do not properly reward people who have earned their money through hard work. However, conservatives usually place a strong emphasis on the role of private voluntary charitable organizations (especially faith-based charities) in helping the poor.[138][139]

Fiscal conservatives support privatization, believing that the private sector is more effective than the public sector. Many support school vouchers for private schools, denouncing the declining performance of the public school system and teachers' unions.[140] They also favor private health care while opposing a universal health care system, claiming it constitutes socialized medicine. They often advocate for cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.[141]

Modern conservatives derive support for free markets from practical grounds. They argue that free markets are the most productive markets and is based upon the Burkean notion of prescription: what works best is what is right. Many modern American fiscal conservatives accept some social spending programs not specifically delineated in the Constitution. However, some American fiscal conservatives view wider social liberalism as an impetus for increased spending on these programs. As such, fiscal conservatism today exists somewhere between classical liberalism and contemporary consequentialist political philosophies.[142][143]

On the other hand, some conservatives tend to oppose free trade policies and support protectionism and immigration reduction instead. They want government intervention to support the economy by protecting American jobs and businesses from foreign competition. They oppose free trade on the ground that it benefits other countries with lower wages or unfair trade practices (i.e. state-owned enterprises or state-provided subsidies) at the expense of American workers. However, in spite of their support for protectionism, they tend to support other free market principles like low taxes, limited government and balanced budgets.[142]

Social issues[edit]

On social issues, many religious conservatives oppose changes in traditional moral standards regarding family, sexuality, and gender roles. They often oppose abortion, feminism, pornography, comprehensive sex education, homosexuality, same-sex marriage, transgender rights, secularism, atheism, and recreational drug use.[7][26][9] The libertarian and fiscal conservative factions tend to ignore these issues, instead focusing on budgetary, monetary, and economic policies.

Race and culture[edit]

See also: Racism in the United States

Modern conservatives usually oppose anti-racist programs such as affirmative action and reparations for slavery, believing that racism does not exist in a modern post-racial America.[144] They therefore argue that legislation should be colorblind, with no consideration for race.[145][146] Conservatives often embrace individualism, rejecting the collectivism associated with identity politics. In addition, many right wing nationalists oppose any attempts by liberals to portray America's history, society, or government as racist, considering it unpatriotic. This has been particularly controversial as racial tensions have intensified since the 2010s, with points of contention including the 1619 Project, the removal of Confederate monuments and memorials, reparations for slavery, and the defund the police movement.[147][148][144][149]

Most conservatives oppose affirmative action on the basis of race. Conservatives argue that affirmative action is not meritocratic, believing that job positions and college admissions should be earned through individual achievement rather than group identity. They oppose it as "reverse discrimination" that hinders reconciliation and worsens racial tensions.[150]

In the culture war of recent decades, multiculturalism has been a flashpoint, especially regarding the humanities curriculum. Historian Peter N. Stearns finds a polarization since the 1960s between conservatives who believe that the humanities express eternal truths that should be taught, and those who think that the humanities curriculum should be tailored to demonstrate diversity.[151] Generally conservatism opposes the "identity politics" associated with multiculturalism, and supports individualism.[152]

Cultural conservatives support monoculturalism and the preservation of traditional American culture. They often oppose multiculturalism and unchecked immigration. They favor a melting pot model of assimilation into the common English-speaking American culture, as opposed to a salad bowl approach that lends legitimacy to many different cultures.[153][154] In the 21st century, conservatives have warned on the dangers of tolerating radical Islamic elements, of the sort that they say are engaging in large-scale terrorism in Europe.[155]

Reaction to liberalism[edit]

Conservative commentator Ross Douthat argues that as liberalism becomes more dominant, conservatism should work to conserve basic values against liberal assault. In 2021, he writes:[156]

Conservatism-under-liberalism should defend human goods that are threatened by liberal ideas taken to extremes. The family, when liberal freedom becomes a corrosive hyper-individualism. Traditional religion, when liberal toleration becomes a militant and superstitious secularism. Local community and local knowledge, against expert certainty and bureaucratic centralization. Artistic and intellectual greatness, when democratic taste turns philistine or liberal intellectuals become apparatchiks. The individual talent of the entrepreneur or businessman, against the leveling impulses of egalitarianism and the stultifying power of monopoly.

Electoral politics[edit]

According to a 2014 Gallup poll, 38% of American voters identify as "conservative" or "very conservative", 34% as "moderate", and 24% as "liberal" or "very liberal".[157] These percentages were fairly constant from 1990 to 2009,[158] when conservatism spiked in popularity briefly,[159] before reverting to the original trend, while liberal views on social issues reached a new high. For Republicans, 70% self-identified as conservative, 24% as moderate, and 5% as liberal. In 2019, the Pew Research Center found that 14% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning registered voters identify as conservative or very conservative, 38% identify as moderate, and 47% identify as liberal or very liberal.[160]

Conservatism appears to be growing stronger at the state level. According to The Atlantic writer Richard Florida, the trend is most pronounced among the "least well-off, least educated, most blue collar, most economically hard-hit states".[161][162]

In the United States, the Republican Party has been the party of conservatism since the middle of 1963 when the conservatives largely took control. When President Kennedy announced his intention to advance the Civil Rights Act he alienated the then-Democrat white conservatives in the South who strongly opposed the civil rights movement.[163] Between 1960 and 2000, the White South moved from 3-1 Democratic to 3-1 Republican.[164]

In addition, some American libertarians, in the Libertarian Party and even some in the Republican Party, see themselves as conservative, even though they advocate significant economic and social changes—for instance, further dismantling the welfare system or liberalizing drug policy. They see these as conservative policies because they conform to the spirit of individual liberty that they consider to be a traditional American value. However, many libertarian think-tanks such as the Cato Institute, and libertarian intellectuals such as David Boaz describe libertarianism as being "socially liberal and fiscally conservative".[165][166]

Geography[edit]

Percent of self-identified conservatives by state in 2018, according to a Gallup poll:[167]   45% and above   40–44%   35–39%   30–34%   25–29%   24% and under

The South, the Great Plains, the Rocky Mountain states, parts of the Midwest, and Alaska are generally conservative strongholds; in Mississippi, for instance, half of respondents identified themselves as conservatives, as opposed to moderates and liberals. The Northeast, Great Lakes region, parts of the Southwest, and West Coast are the main liberal strongholds; the fraction of Massachusetts self-identified conservatives being as low as 21%.[167] In the 21st century, rural areas of the United States that tend to be blue-collar, evangelical Christian, and predominantly White are generally conservative bastions.[168] Voters in the urban cores of large metropolitan areas tend to be more liberal and Democratic. There is a clear urban–rural political divide within and among states.[169]

Other topics[edit]

Russell Kirk's principles of conservatism[edit]

Russell Kirk developed six "canons" of conservatism, which Gerald J. Russello described as follows:

A belief in a transcendent order, which Kirk described variously as based in tradition, divine revelation, or natural law.

An affection for the "variety and mystery" of human existence.

A conviction that society requires orders and classes that emphasize natural distinctions.

A belief that property and freedom are closely linked.

A faith in custom, convention, and prescription.

A recognition that innovation must be tied to existing traditions and customs, which entails a respect for the political value of prudence.[170]

Kirk said that Christianity and Western civilization are "unimaginable apart from one another"[171] and that "all culture arises out of religion. When religious faith decays, culture must decline, though often seeming to flourish for a space after the religion which has nourished it has sunk into disbelief."[172]

In later works, Kirk expanded this list into his "Ten Principles of Conservatism"[173] which are as follows:

First, the conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order.

Second, the conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity.

Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription.

Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence.

Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety.

Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectability.

Seventh, conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked.

Eighth, conservatives uphold voluntary community, quite as they oppose involuntary collectivism.

Ninth, the conservative perceives the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions.

Tenth, the thinking conservative understands that permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society.

Courts[edit]

One stream of conservatism exemplified by William Howard Taft extols independent judges as experts in fairness and the final arbiters of the Constitution. In 1910, Theodore Roosevelt broke with most of his lawyer friends and called for popular votes that could overturn unwelcome decisions by state courts. Taft denounced his old friend and rallied conservatives to defeat him for the 1912 GOP nomination. Taft and the conservative Republicans controlled the Supreme Court until the late 1930s.[174][175]

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a liberal Democrat, did not attack the Supreme Court directly in 1937, but ignited a firestorm of protest by a proposal to add seven new justices. Conservative Democrats immediately broke with President Roosevelt, defeated his proposal, and built up the conservative coalition. While the liberals did take over the Court through replacements, they lost control of Congress. That is, the Court no longer overthrew liberal laws passed by Congress, but there were very few such laws that passed in 1937–60.[176]

Conservatives' views of the courts are based on their beliefs: maintaining the present state of affairs, conventional and rule-oriented, and disapproval of government power.[177] A recent variant of conservatism condemns "judicial activism"; that is, judges using their decisions to control policy, along the lines of the Warren Court in the 1960s. It came under conservative attack for decisions regarding redistricting, desegregation, and the rights of those accused of crimes. This position goes back to Jefferson's vehement attacks on federal judges and to Abraham Lincoln's attacks on the Dred Scott decision of 1857.[178][179]

Originalism[edit]

Main article: Originalism

A more recent variant that emerged in the 1980s is originalism, the assertion that the United States Constitution should be interpreted to the maximum extent possible in the light of what it meant when it was adopted. Originalism should not be confused with a similar conservative ideology, strict constructionism, which deals with the interpretation of the Constitution as written, but not necessarily within the context of the time when it was adopted. For example, the term originalism has been used by current Supreme Court justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, as well as former federal judges Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia to explain their beliefs.[180]

Federalism[edit]

According to Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority in Gregory v. Ashcroft 501 U.S. 452 (1991), there are significant advantages to federalism and the recognition of state rights:

The federalist structure of joint sovereigns preserves to the people numerous advantages. It assures a decentralized government that will be more sensitive to the diverse needs of a heterogeneous society; it increases opportunity for citizen involvement in democratic processes; it allows for more innovation and experimentation in government; and it makes government more responsive by putting the States in competition for a mobile citizenry.[181]

From the left, law professor Herman Schwartz argues that Rehnquist's reliance on federalism and state's rights has been a "Fig Leaf for conservatives":

Today's conservative Supreme Court majority, led by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, has imposed limitations on federal power to curtail the rights of women, religious groups, the elderly, racial minorities, and other disadvantaged groups. ... The conservatives have shrunk the scope of the commerce clause, developed implied limitations on federal authority, and narrowly construed the Civil War amendments.[182]

Semantics, language, and media[edit]

Socialism[edit]

Conservatives have used the word Socialist as a "rhetorical weapon" against political opponents.[183][184] David Hinshaw writes that William Allen White, editor of a small-town newspaper in Kansas from 1895, used "socialistic" as "his big gun to blast radical opposition".[185] White set "Americanism" as the alternative, warning: "The election will sustain Americanism or it will plant Socialism." White became famous when Mark Hanna, campaign manager for Republican candidate William McKinley distributed upwards of a million or more copies of one White editorial to rally opposition to William Jennings Bryan, the nominee of both the Democratic and Populist parties.[186][187]

By the 1950s, the conservative press had discovered that socialism "proved to be a successful derogatory epithet rather than a descriptive label for a meaningful political alternative".[188] At the 1952 Republican national convention, former President Herbert Hoover repeated his warnings about two decades of New Deal policies, denouncing, says Gary Best, "The usurpation of power by the federal government, the loss of freedom in America, the poisoning of the American economy with fascism, socialism, and Keynesianism, the enormous growth of the federal bureaucracy".[189] In 1960, Barry Goldwater called for Republican unity against John F. Kennedy and the "blueprint for socialism presented by the Democrats".[190] In 1964, Goldwater attacked central planners like fellow Republican Nelson Rockefeller, implying he was a socialist in a millionaire's garb: "The Democratic party believes in what I call socialism: and if that upsets anybody's stomach, let me remind you that central planning of our economy is socialism."[191] Ronald Reagan often quoted Norman Thomas, the perennial Socialist nominee for president in the New Deal era, as allegedly saying: "The American people would never knowingly vote for Socialism, but that under the name of liberalism, they would adopt every fragment of the socialist program."[192][193][194] In 2010, Newt Gingrich defined "socialism in the broad sense" as "a government-dominated, bureaucratically controlled, politician-dictated way of life".[195] Gingrich stated that President Barack Obama was "committed to socialism".[195]

Modern media[edit]

Keith Rupert Murdoch, founder of Fox Corporation, in 2012

Conservatives gained a major new communications medium with the resurgence of talk radio in the late 1980s. William G. Mayer, reports that "conservatives dominate talk radio to an overwhelming, remarkable degree".[196] This dominance enabled them to spread their message much more effectively to the general public, which had previously been confined to the major Big Three television networks. Political scientists Jeffrey M. Berry and Sarah Sobieraj conclude that, "conservatives like talk radio because they believe it tells them the truth. Liberals appear to be much more satisfied with the mainstream media and are more likely to believe that it is accurate."[197]

Rush Limbaugh proved there was a huge nationwide audience for specific and heated discussions of current events from a conservative viewpoint. Other major hosts who describe themselves as conservative include: Michael Peroutka, Jim Quinn, Dennis Miller, Ben Ferguson, William Bennett, Andrew Wilkow, Lars Larson, Sean Hannity, G. Gordon Liddy, Laura Ingraham, Mike Church, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Kim Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Michael Reagan, Jason Lewis, Ken Hamblin, and Herman Cain.[198] The Salem Radio Network syndicates a group of religiously oriented Republican activists, including Roman Catholic Hugh Hewitt, and Jewish conservatives Dennis Prager and Michael Medved. One popular Jewish conservative, Laura Schlessinger, offers parental and personal advice, but is outspoken on social and political issues. In 2011, the largest weekly audiences for talk radio were 15 million for Limbaugh and 14 million for Hannity, with about nine million each for Glenn Beck, Michael Savage and Mark Levin. The audiences overlap, depending on how many each listener dials into every week.[199]

Fox News features conservative hosts.[200] One such host is Sean Hannity, who also has a talk radio program.[201] One former host is Matt Drudge;[202] prior, and after his time on Fox News Drudge has operated Drudge Report, a news aggregation website, and is a self-professed conservative.[203] It is more conservative than other news sources in the United States, such as National Public Radio and CNN.[204] Canadian-American political commentator David Frum has been a critic of this development, and has argued that the influence of conservative talk radio and Fox News has harmed American conservatism, turning it from "a political philosophy into a market segment" for extremism and conflict making "for bad politics but great TV".[205]

Science and academia[edit]

Attitudes towards science[edit]

Whereas liberals and conservatives held similar attitudes towards science up until the 1990s, conservatives in the United States subsequently began to display lower levels of confidence in scientific consensus.[206][207][208][209] Conservatives are substantially more likely than moderates and liberals to reject the scientific consensus on climate change.[210][211][209] Conservatives are also more likely than liberals to hold anti-vaccine views.[212]

Admission to academia[edit]

Liberal and leftist viewpoints have dominated higher education faculties since the 1970s, according to many studies,[213][214][215] whereas conservatives are better represented in policy-oriented think tanks. Data from a survey conducted in 2004 indicated that 72% of full-time faculty identify as liberal,[216] while 9–18% self-identify as conservative. Conservative self-identification is higher in two-year colleges than other categories of higher education but has been declining overall.[217] Those in natural sciences, engineering, and business were less liberal than those in the social sciences and humanities. A 2005 study found that liberal views had increased compared to the older studies. 15% in the survey described themselves as center-right. While the humanities and the social sciences are still the most left leaning, 67% of those in other fields combined described themselves as center-left on the spectrum. In business and engineering, liberals outnumber conservatives by a 2:1 ratio. The study also found that more women, practicing Christians, and Republicans taught at lower ranked schools than would be expected from objectively measured professional accomplishments.[218][219]

A study by psychologists Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammars, of the Netherlands' Tilburg University, published in September 2012 in the journal Perspectives on Psychological Science, found that, in social and personality psychology,[220] about a third of those surveyed say that they would to a small extent favor a liberal point of view over a conservative point of view.[221] A 2007 poll found that 58% of Americans thought that college professors' political bias was a "serious problem". This varied depending on the political views of those asked. 91% of "very conservative" adults agreed compared with only 3% of liberals.[222] That same year, a documentary called Indoctrinate U was released, which focuses on the perceived bias within academia.[223][224][225]

On the other hand, liberal critic Paul Krugman wrote in The New York Times that this phenomenon is more due to personal choice than some kind of discrimination or conspiracy, noting that, for example, vocations such as military officers are much more likely to be filled by conservatives rather than liberals.[226] Additionally, two studies published in the journal of the American Political Science Association have suggested that the political orientations of college students' professors have little influence or "indoctrination" in terms of students' political belief.[227]

Relativism versus absolutism[edit]

Postmodernism is an approach common in the humanities at universities that greatly troubles conservative intellectuals.[228][229] The point of contention is the debate over moral relativism versus moral absolutism. Ellen Grigsby says, "Postmodern perspectives contend that any ideology putting forward absolute statements as timeless truths should be viewed with profound skepticism."[230] Kellner says, "Postmodern discourse frequently argues that all discourses and values are socially constructed and laden with interests and biases. Against postmodern and liberal relativism, cultural conservatives have argued for values of universal truth and absolute standards of right and wrong."[231]

Neoconservative historian Gertrude Himmelfarb has energetically rejected postmodern academic approaches:

[Postmodernism in history] is a denial of the objectivity of the historian, of the factuality or reality of the past, and thus of the possibility of arriving at any truths about the past. For all disciplines it induces a radical skepticism, relativism, and subjectivism that denies not this or that truth about any subject but the very idea of truth—that denies even the ideal of truth, truth is something to aspire to even if it can never be fully attained.[232]

Jay Stevenson wrote the following representative summary of postmodern literary studies of the sort that antagonize conservatives:

[In the postmodern period,] traditional literature has been found to have been written by "dead white males" to serve the ideological aims of a conservative and repressive Anglo hegemony. ... In an array of reactions against the race, gender, and class biases found to be woven into the tradition of Anglo lit, multicultural writers and political literary theorists have sought to expose, resist, and redress injustices and prejudices. These prejudices are often covert—disguised in literature and other discourses as positive ideals and objective truths—but they slant our sense of reality in favor of power and privilege.[233]

Conservative intellectuals have championed a "high conservative modernism" that insists that universal truths exist, and have opposed approaches that deny the existence of universal truths.[234] Many argued that natural law was the repository of timeless truths.[235] Allan Bloom, in his highly influential The Closing of the American Mind (1987) argues that moral degradation results from ignorance of the great classics that shaped Western culture. His book was widely cited by conservative intellectuals for its argument that the classics contained universal truths and timeless values which were being ignored by cultural relativists.[236][237]

In Postwar American Fiction and the Rise of Modern Conservatism: A Literary History, 1945 - 2008 (Cambridge University Press, 2021), Bryan M. Santin argues that conservative literary tastes have shifted over time. He argues that this

shift registered and mediated the deeper foundational antinomy structuring postwar conservatism itself: the stable social order of traditionalism and the creative destruction of free-market capitalism. Postwar conservatives produced, in effect, an ambivalent double register in the discourse of conservative literary taste that sought to celebrate neo-aristocratic manifestations of cultural capital while condemning newer, more progressive manifestations revolving around racial and ethnic diversity.[238]

Historiography[edit]

In recent years, historians have agreed that they need to rethink the role of conservatism in recent American history.[239] An important new approach rejects the older consensus that liberalism was the dominant ethos. Labor historians Jefferson Cowie and Nick Salvatore argue the New Deal was a short-term response to the depression and did not mark a permanent commitment to a welfare state, claiming that America has always been too individualistic and too hostile to labor unions to ever embrace liberalism for any extended period of time. This new interpretation argues that conservatism has largely dominated American politics since the 1920s, with the brief exceptions of the New Deal era (1933–1938) and the Great Society (1964–1966).[240] However, historian Julian Zelizer argues that "The coherence of conservatism has been exaggerated. The movement was as fragile as the New Deal coalition that it replaced. ... Policy change has thus proved to be much more difficult than conservatives hoped for."[241] Zelizer does find four areas where conservatives did make major changes, namely retrenchment of domestic programs, lowering taxes, deregulation, and opposition to labor unions. He concludes, "The fact is that liberalism survived the rise of conservatism."[242]

American exceptionalism[edit]

Main article: American exceptionalism

American conservatives typically promote American exceptionalism, the idea that the United States is inherently different from other nations and has a duty to take the lead in spreading democracy and free markets to the world. Reagan especially articulated this role (and many liberals also agree with it).[243][244] They see American values emerging from the American Revolution, thereby becoming what political scientist Seymour Martin Lipset called "the first new nation"[245] and developing a uniquely American ideology, "Americanism", based on liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, republicanism, democracy, laissez-faire capitalism and Judeo-Christian values.[5][246]

Although the term does not necessarily imply superiority, many neoconservative and other American conservative writers have promoted its use in that sense.[247][248] To them, the U.S. is like the biblical "City upon a Hill"—a phrase evoked by Puritan settlers in Massachusetts as early as 1630—and exempt from historical forces that have affected other countries.[249]

Scholars have argued that British and European conservatism has little or no relevance to American traditions. According to political scientist Louis Hartz, because the United States skipped the feudal stage of history, the American community was united by liberal principles, and the conflict between the "Whig" and "Democratic" parties were conflicts within a liberal framework.[250] In this view, what is called "conservatism" in America is not European conservatism (with its royalty, landowning aristocracy, elite officer corps, and established churches) but rather 19th century classical liberalism with an emphasis on economic freedom and entrepreneurship.[251] This is in contrast to the view that Burkean conservatism has a set of universal principles which can be applied to all societies.[252] In The Conservative Mind (1953), Russell Kirk argued that the American Revolution was "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation".[95] Liberal historian Richard Hofstader criticized modern American conservatives as "pseudo-conservatives" because their negative reaction to the policies of Truman showed "dissatisfaction with American life, traditions and institutions" and because they had "little in common with the temperate and compromising spirit of true conservatism".[253]

Past thinkers and leaders[edit]

See also: List of American conservatives

Portrait of John Adams in 1792

The Giants of American Conservatism[edit]

In 1956, Clinton Rossiter, an expert on American political history, published Conservatism in America and a summary article on "The Giants of American Conservatism" in American Heritage.[254] His goal was to identify the "great men who did conservative deeds, thought conservative thoughts, practiced conservative virtues, and stood for conservative principles". To Rossiter, conservatism was defined by the rule of the upper class. He wrote, "The Right of these freewheeling decades was a genuine Right: it was led by the rich and well-placed; it was skeptical of popular government; it was opposed to all parties, unions, leagues, or other movements that sought to invade its positions of power and profit; it was politically, socially, and culturally anti-radical." His "giants of American conservatism" were John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, John Marshall, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, Elihu Root, and Theodore Roosevelt. He added that Washington and Lincoln transcend the usual categories, but that conservatives "may argue with some conviction that Washington and Lincoln can also be added to his list".[254]

Among the fathers of the U.S. Constitution, which Rossiter calls "a triumph of conservative statesmanship", he said conservatives may "take special pride" in James Madison, James Wilson, Roger Sherman, John Dickinson, Gouverneur Morris, and the Pinckneys of South Carolina. For the early 19th century, Rossiter said the libertarians and constitutionalists who deserve credit for leading the fight against Jacksonian democracy are Joseph Story and Josiah Quincy in Massachusetts, James Kent in New York, and James Madison, James Monroe, and John Randolph of Roanoke in Virginia.[254]

In the decades around the end of the 19th century, Rossiter says Grover Cleveland, Elihu Root, William Howard Taft, and Theodore Roosevelt "were most successful in shaping the old truths of conservatism to the new facts of industrialism and democracy". In what Rossiter called the "Great Train Robbery of Intellectual History", the laissez-faire, he says conservatives appropriated the themes of classical liberalism, especially liberty, opportunity, progress, and individualism, and packaged them into an ideology that supported the property rights of big corporations.[255] Writing in 1955, Rossiter suggested that Robert A. Taft, Charles Evans Hughes, and Dwight D. Eisenhower may someday be added to the list.[254]

See also[edit]

Bibliography of conservatism in the United States

Christian right

Compassionate conservatism

Conservative coalition in Congress, 1938–1960s

Fusionism

Liberalism in the United States

Libertarianism in the United States

Media bias in the United States

Neoconservatism

Old Right (United States)

Paleoconservatism

Progressivism in the United States

Radical right (United States)

Republican Party (United States)

Timeline of modern American conservatism

Two-party system in the United States

References[edit]

^ Frohnen, Bruce; Beer, Jeremy; Jeffrey, Nelson (2014). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Intercollegiate Studies Institute. ISBN 9781497651579. The conservative veneration of individual autonomy...

^ Bivins, Jason C. (May 25, 2018). "How Christian media is shaping American politics". The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2022. Retrieved April 6, 2022.

^ "Evangelicalism and Politics". The American Historian. Archived from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved April 6, 2022.

^ Gramlich, John (August 18, 2020). "5 facts about Fox News". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on July 4, 2022. Retrieved April 6, 2022.

^ a b c Joel D. Aberbach; Gillian Peele (2011). Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford UP. p. 260. ISBN 9780199830268.

^ Farmer, Brian (2005). American Conservatism: History, Theory and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 52. ISBN 978-1904303541. To traditional conservatives, there most definitely are moral absolutes and they can most definitely and definitively identify those moral absolutes.

^ a b c d Wilcox, Clyde (2018). Onward Christian Soldiers?: The Religious Right in American Politics. Routledge. p. 96. ISBN 9780429974533.

^ Langdale, John (2012). Superfluous Southerners: Cultural Conservatism and the South, 1920–1990. University of Missouri Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780826272850.

^ a b c d Cal Jillson (2011). Texas Politics: Governing the Lone Star State. Taylor & Francis. p. 87. ISBN 9780203829417. Social conservatives focus on moral or values issues, such as abortion, marriage, school prayer, and judicial appointments.

^ Davenport, David; Lloyd, Gordon (2013). The New Deal & Modern American Conservatism: A Defining Rivalry (eBook ed.). Hoover Institution Press. ISBN 9780817916862.

^ O'Neill, Johnathan; Postell, Joseph W., eds. (2013). Toward an American Conservatism: Constitutional Conservatism During the Progressive Era (eBook ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137300966.

^ Hoover, Kenneth R. (April 1987). "The Rise of Conservative Capitalism: Ideological Tensions within the Reagan and Thatcher Governments". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 29 (2): 245–268. doi:10.1017/S0010417500014493. ISSN 1475-2999. S2CID 145076916. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.

^ Paul, Murschetz (2013). State Aid for Newspapers: Theories. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 64. ISBN 978-3642356902.

^ Howison, Jeffrey D. (February 2018). "The Historical Origins and Contemporary Dynamics of Conservatism in the United States: Anticommunism, the New Class Critique, and the Environment". Political Studies Review. 16 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1177/1478929915611918. ISSN 1478-9299. S2CID 148367886.

^ Heineman, Kenneth J. (2018). The Rise of Contemporary Conservatism in the United States (eBook ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429456442. ISBN 9780429456442. S2CID 159281982.

^ Sexton, Patricia Cayo (2019) [1991]. The War on Labor and the Left: Understanding America's Unique Conservatism (eBook ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429492716. ISBN 9780429492716.

^ Pilbeam, Bruce (2003). Anglo-American Conservative Ideology After the Cold War. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 100. ISBN 978-0333997659. For most conservatives, if there is a common culprit in explaining society's descent into moral chaos, then it is relativism—the notion that there are no absolute values or standards, merely different interpretations, and perspectives.

^ Critchlow, Donald (2009). Debating the American Conservative Movement: 1945 to the Present. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 15. ISBN 978-0742548244. Conservatives had a fear of Communism shared by most Americans. During this time a popular anti-Communist culture emerged in America, evident in movies, television programs, community activities, and grassroots organizations. This popular anti-Communist culture generated patriotic rallies, parades, city resolutions, and an array of anti—Communist groups concerned about Communist influence in the schools, textbooks, churches, labor unions, industry, and universities.

^ Oreskes, Naomi (June 1, 2021). "The Reason Some Republicans Mistrust Science: Their Leaders Tell Them To". Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 21, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.

^ Hofer, Barbara; Sinatra, Gale (August 19, 2021). Science Denial: Why It Happens and What to Do About It. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190944681.001.0001. ISBN 9780190944711. Archived from the original on October 16, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.

^ Jones, Jeffrey (August 20, 2021). "Study: Evolution now accepted by majority of Americans". University of Michigan News. Archived from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.

^ Gregory L. Schneider, The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution "The label (conservatism) is in frequent use and has come to stand for a skepticism, at times an outright hostility, toward government social policies; a muscular foreign policy combined with a patriotic nationalism; a defense of traditional Christian religious values; and support for the free-market economic system.", "Within the conservative disposition in America, there are inherent contradictions between supporters of social order and tradition and supporters of individual freedom." (2009) pp. 4–9, 136

^ Sherwood Thompson, Encyclopedia of Diversity and Social Justice. p. 7: "Historically...social justice became associated with liberalism in which equality is the ideal.", Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, ISBN 978-1442216044.

^ Busch, Andrew E. (December 1, 2011). "Social Conservatives and Economic Conservatives". Society. 49 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1007/s12115-011-9498-4.

^ Lasser, William (1988). "V. The Modern Supreme Court: Crisis as Usual?". The Limits of Judicial Power: The Supreme Court in American Politics. UNC Press Books. pp. 186–188. ISBN 9781469632469. Retrieved February 23, 2019.

^ a b c Glenn H. Utter; James L. True (2004). Conservative Christians and Political Participation: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. pp. 51–53. ISBN 9781851095131.

^ a b c d e Hudelson, Richard (1999). Modern Political Philosophy. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0765600219 – via Google Books.

^ a b c d e M. O. Dickerson et al., An Introduction to Government and Politics: A Conceptual Approach (2009) p. 129.

^ "Two-thirds of Southern Republicans say they support breaking away from the U.S. and forming their own country with nearby states...", https://www.newsweek.com/47-west-coast-dems-66-southern-republicans-want-secede-us-1609875

^ Patrick Allitt, The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History, "before the 1950s there was no such thing as a conservative movement in the United States.", p. 2, Yale University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0-300-16418-3

^ Kirk, Russell. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot (1953) traced a continuous tradition since the 1790s.

^ Nicol C. Rae (1994). Southern Democrats. Oxford U.P. p. 66. ISBN 9780198024774. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2015.

^ Vesla M. Weaver, "Frontlash: Race and the development of punitive crime policy." Studies in American political development 21.2 (2007): 230–265.

^ Black, Merle (2004). "The Transformation of the Southern Democratic Party". The Journal of Politics. 66 (4): 1001–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00287.x. S2CID 154506701.

^ Katznelson, Ira; Geiger, Kim; Kryder, Daniel (Summer 1993). "Limiting Liberalism: The Southern Veto in Congress, 1933–1950" (PDF). Political Science Quarterly. 108 (2): 283. doi:10.2307/2152013. JSTOR 2152013. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 11, 2020. Retrieved July 12, 2015.

^

Glen Feldman, The Irony of the Solid South, "The worshipful allegiance white southerners gave to that party emanated most fundamentally from the deep-seated, pervasive, almost indelible cultural conservatism of the region...", University Alabama Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0817317935.

^ Nash, George H (April 26, 2016). "The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America: Then and Now". National Review. New York. Archived from the original on November 9, 2016. Retrieved April 14, 2017. Modern American conservatism is not, and has never been, monolithic. It is a coalition with many points of origin and diverse tendencies that are not always easy to reconcile.

^ Paul S. Boyer; et al. (2007). The Enduring Vision: A History of the American People. Cengage Learning. p. 934. ISBN 978-0618801596.

^ Barber, J Matt (October 29, 2010). "BARBER Republicans must 'hang together or there won't be much time before Tea Party backers bail". The Washington Times.

^ Longman, Martin (April 7, 2016). "The Republicans' Four-Legged Stool". Washington Monthly.

^ Academy, _Grassroots Leadership (February 25, 2019). "What Made Reagan's Coalition?". Americans for Prosperity. Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021.

^ see Steven Brint and Jean Reith Schroedel, eds., Evangelicals and Democracy in America, Volume II: Religion and Politics (Russell Sage Foundation, 2009) for scholarly studies

^ Prudence Flowers, "'A Prolife Disaster': The Reagan Administration and the Nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor." Journal of Contemporary History 53.2 (2018): 391–414.

^ Safire, William (January 25, 2004). "The Way We Live Now: On Language; Guns, God And Gays". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 11, 2020. Retrieved May 28, 2023.

^ "Ahoura Afshar, "The Anti-gay Rights Movement in the United States: The Framing of Religion," Essex Human Rights Review (2006) 3#1 pp. 64–79" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 11, 2020. Retrieved July 10, 2011.

^ Glenn Utter and Robert J. Spitzer, Encyclopedia of Gun Control & Gun Rights (2nd ed. 2011)

^ John Anderson; University of North Carolina John Anderson (2014). Conservative Christian Politics in Russia and the United States: Dreaming of Christian Nations. Routledge. p. 136. ISBN 978-1-317-60663-5.Amy Lind; Stephanie Brzuzy (2008). Battleground: M-Z. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 508. ISBN 978-0-313-34039-0.Kenneth M. Cosgrove (2007). Branded Conservatives: How the Brand Brought the Right from the Fringes to the Center of American Politics. Peter Lang. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-8204-7465-6.Steven L. Danver (2013). Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West. Sage Publications. p. 262. ISBN 978-1-4522-7606-9.

^ J. Postell; J. O'Neill (2013). Toward an American Conservatism: Constitutional Conservatism during the Progressive Era. Springer. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-1-137-30096-6.Ken Blackwell; Ken Klukowski (May 31, 2011). Resurgent: How Constitutional Conservatism Can Save America. Simon and Schuster. pp. 99–100. ISBN 978-1-4516-2928-6.

^ Peter Berkowitz (2013). Constitutional Conservatism. Hoover Press. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-8179-1604-6.

^ Schambra, William A. (August 20, 2012). "The Origins and Revival of Constitutional Conservatism: 1912 and 2012". Political Process. The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on June 12, 2017. Retrieved June 21, 2017.

^ Lienesch, Michael (July 2016). "Creating Constitutional Conservatism". Polity. 48 (3): 387–413. doi:10.1057/pol.2016.10. S2CID 147743074. Archived from the original on September 1, 2017. Retrieved June 21, 2017.

^ Mark A. Graber (2015). A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-19-024523-8. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2017.

^ Bradley C. S. Watson (2009). Ourselves and Our Posterity: Essays in Constitutional Originalism. Lexington Books. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-7391-2789-6.Daniel T. Rodgers (2011). Age of Fracture. Harvard University Press. pp. 241–242. ISBN 978-0-674-05952-8. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2017.

^ Nancy Maveety (2016). Picking Judges. Transaction Publishers. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-4128-6224-0.

^ Ronald Hamowy (2008). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Sage Publications. ISBN 9781412965804. Archived from the original on January 9, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2015.[page needed]

^ Mandal, V.C. (2007). Dictionary Of Public Administration. Sarup & Sons. p. 306. ISBN 978-81-7625-784-8.

^ a b c Nwanevu, Osita (July 21, 2019). "Conservative Nationalism Is Trumpism for Intellectuals". New Yorker. Archived from the original on April 29, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2019.

^ a b "What's behind Trump's 'law and order' strategy and will it work?". TheGuardian.com. September 2020. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.

^ a b Boot, Max (July 22, 2019). "What comes after Trump may be even worse". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 26, 2019. Retrieved July 22, 2019.

^ "National Conservatism, a conference in Washington DC, July 14–16". nationalconservatism.org. Archived from the original on May 30, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2019.

^ Schuessler, Jennifer (July 19, 2019). "Polishing the Nationalist Brand in the Trump Era". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2019.

^ "Conservative Nationalism is Trumpism for Intellectuals". The New Yorker. July 21, 2019. Archived from the original on April 29, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2019.

^ a b Justin Vaïsse (2010). Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement. Harvard UP. pp. 244ff. ISBN 9780674050518.

^ Jean Edward Smith, Bush, "Bush precipitated the deterioration of America's position abroad, led the United States in a $3 trillion dollar war in Iraq that cost more than four thousand American lives, ... and inspired young Muslims throughout the world to join the jihad.", Simon & Schuster; Reprint edition (2017), ISBN 978-1476741208.

^ Bruce Frohnen, ed. American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia (2006) pp. ix–xiv

^ Michael Foley (2007). American credo: the place of ideas in US politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191528330. Against accusations of being pre-modern or even anti-modern in outlook, paleoconservatives press for restrictions on immigration, a rollback of multicultural programmes, the decentralization of the federal polity, the restoration of controls upon free trade, a greater emphasis upon economic nationalism and isolationism in the conduct of American foreign policy, and a generally revanchist outlook upon a social order in need of recovering old lines of distinction and in particular the assignment of roles in accordance with traditional categories of gender, ethnicity, and race.

^ Paul Gottfried, Conservatism in America: Making Sense of the American Right, p. 9, "Postwar conservatives set about creating their own synthesis of free-market capitalism, Christian morality, and the global struggle against Communism." (2009); Gottfried, Theologies and moral concern (1995) p. 12.

^ Samuel P. Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations," Foreign Affairs Summer 1993, v72, n3, pp. 22–50, online version Archived May 5, 2020, at the Wayback Machine.

^ Joseph Scotchie. The Paleoconservatives: New Voices of the Old Right. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 9781412838184.

^ Peter Berkowitz (2004). Varieties of Conservatism in America. Hoover Press. pp. 19ff. ISBN 9780817945732.

^ Edward G. Carmines, and Michael Berkman, "Ethos, ideology, and partisanship: Exploring the paradox of conservative Democrats." Political Behavior 16 (1994): 203-218. online

^ Adam J. Schiffer, "I'm not that liberal: Explaining conservative democratic identification." Political Behavior 22 (2000): 293-310.

^ "The Magazine's Credenda". National Review. Archived from the original on February 22, 2015. Retrieved May 28, 2023.

^ Peter Viereck, Conservative Thinkers: From John Adams to Winston Churchill (1956), pp. 1–22.

^ Milan Zafirovski (2008). Modern Free Society and Its Nemesis: Liberty Versus Conservatism in the New Millennium. Lexington Books. pp. 44–45. ISBN 9780739115169.

^ George H. Nash, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945 (2008) pp. 446–455.

^ Johan Van Overtveldt, The Chicago School: how the University of Chicago assembled the thinkers who revolutionized economics and business (2007).

^ "The Value-Centered Historicism of Edmund Burke". National Humanities Institute. July 29, 2010. Archived from the original on April 11, 2020. Retrieved January 6, 2012.

^ Callaghan, John (2001). "The Cold War and the March of Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy". Contemporary British History. 15 (3): 1–25. doi:10.1080/713999415. S2CID 144613584.

^ See President Reagan's speech to governors in 1987 at Reagan, Ronald (1989). Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Ronald Reagan, 1987. Best Books on. p. 292. ISBN 9781623769505.

^ Majia Holmer Nadesan (June 10, 2010). Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-1-135-90358-9.Joel D. Aberbach; Gillian Peele (June 17, 2011). Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford University Press. p. 260. ISBN 978-0-19-983136-4. Archived from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2017.Louise A. Tilly; Patricia Gurin (1990). Women, Politics and Change. Russell Sage Foundation. p. 532. ISBN 978-1-61044-534-4.

^ Darren Dochuk, From Bible Belt to Sun Belt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism (W.W. Norton & Company; 2010) shows how migrants to Southern California from Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas provided evangelical support for social conservatism.

^ Grover Cleveland, "The President's message, 1887" (1887) online p. 37 Archived April 5, 2023, at the Wayback Machine

^ Ed Kilgore. "Starving the Beast". Blueprint Magazine. Archived from the original on November 20, 2004. Retrieved December 9, 2010.

^ "Article | The American Prospect". Prospect.org. March 15, 2005. Retrieved December 9, 2010.[permanent dead link]

^ Plotkin, Sidney; Scheuerman, William (1994). "Balanced-Budget Conservatism and the Squeeze on the States". Private Interest, Public Spending: Balanced-Budget Conservatism and the Fiscal Crisis (paperback ed.). South End Press. pp. 67–86. ISBN 9780896084643. Archived from the original on April 8, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2023. 'If you tax wealth,' said Quayle, 'you diminish wealth. If you diminish wealth, you diminish investment. The fewer the investments, the fewer [the] jobs.' Low taxes equal more jobs; low taxes are as good for the working class as the business class. ... If the state is necessary, suggest Quayle, keep it small.

^ Homolar-Riechmann, Alexandra (2009). "The moral purpose of US power: neoconservatism in the age of Obama". Contemporary Politics. 15 (2): 179–96. doi:10.1080/13569770902858111. S2CID 154947602.

^ Michael Kazin et al. eds. The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History (2011) pp. 117–128.

^ Jack P. Maddex Jr. (2018). The Virginia Conservatives, 1867–1879: A Study in Reconstruction Politics. University of North Carolina Press. p. 13. ISBN 9781469648101. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved January 19, 2019.

^ Harrison, Brigid C. (January 1, 2016). Power and Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Cengage Learning. pp. 47–49. ISBN 9781337025966. Retrieved March 30, 2016.

^ Arthur Aughey, Greta Jones, W. T. M. Riches, The Conservative Political Tradition in Britain and the United States (1992), p. 1: "[T]here are those who advance the thesis that American exceptionalism means ... [but] there can be no American conservatism precisely because the American Revolution created a universally liberal society."

^ Patrick Allitt, The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History (Yale U.P. 2009), p. 278

^ Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan, Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, p. 114, "Conservative ideas are, thus, more genuine and profound than many critics suggest, but such unity as they have is purely negative, definable only by its opposition and rejection of abstract, universal, and ideal principles..."

^ Morris, Roger (1990). Richard Milhous Nixon: The Rise of an American Politician (1st ed.). New York: Henry Holt and Company. p. 366. ISBN 978-0-8050-1121-0.

^ a b Russell Kirk, The Conservative Mind (1950), pp. 6, 63.

^ a b c Speer, Sean (July 29, 2023). "The conservative consensus is over. The consequences for the Canadian Right will be profound". The Hub. Retrieved August 6, 2023.

^ Michael Austin (2012). That's Not what They Meant!: Reclaiming the Founding Fathers from America's Right Wing. Prometheus Books. pp. 9–11. ISBN 9781616146702.

^ R. B. Ripley, "Adams, Burke, and Eighteenth-Century Conservatism." Political Science Quarterly (1965). 80#2: 216–235. online Archived February 21, 2021, at the Wayback Machine

^ Russell Kirk, "Adams, John" in John Frohnen, ed., American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia (2006) p. 11

^ Clinton Rossiter, Conservatism in America (1955) p. 114.

^ A. Owen Aldridge, "John Adams: Pioneer American Conservative." Modern Age (2002) 44#3 pp. 217–225.

^ Aldridge, p. 224

^ Peter Viereck (1956). Conservative Thinkers: From John Adams to Winston Churchill. Routledge. pp. 89–90. ISBN 9781351526425. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved July 5, 2018.

^ a b Kathleen G. Donohue (2005). Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Idea of the Consumer. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 2. ISBN 9780801883910.

^ Stephen R. Ortiz, "The New Deal for Veterans: The Economy Act, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and the Origins of New Deal Dissent." Journal of Military History 70.2 (2006): 415-438.

^ George McJimsey, "Glorious Contentment: the Grand Army of the Republic, 1865-1900." Annals of Iowa 52.4 (1993) pp 474-476.

^ Gregory S. Hopely, Against the classes and the masses: The American Legion, the American Federation of Labor, and Square Deal Americanism in the 1920s (Rowan University, 2020).

^ Morten Bach, "None so consistently right: The American Legion's Cold War, 1945–1950," (PhD dissertation, Ohio University, 2007) Excerpt Archived February 21, 2021, at the Wayback Machine

^ Ronald Lora and William Henry Longton, The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America (1999) pp. 479–88.

^ Timothy J Lynch, ed. The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Military and Diplomatic History (2013) 1: 38–40.

^ Paul Finkelman (2006). The Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties. Taylor & Francis. p. 357. ISBN 9780415943420.

^ Adam Laats, "Our schools, our country: American evangelicals, public schools, and the Supreme Court decisions of 1962 and 1963." Journal of religious history 36.3 (2012): 319–334.

^ William M. Beaney, and Edward N. Beiser, "Prayer and politics: the impact of Engel and Schempp on the political process." Journal of Public Law 13 (1964): 475.

^ Dieter Plehwe, Bernhard Walpen, Gisela Neunhöffer (eds), Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique, Routledge (2006), ISBN 0415460034, p. 1.

^ Steven F. Hayward, The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution 1980–1989 (2009), p. 477.

^ Chris Edwards, "Reagan's Budget Legacy," CATO Institute June 8, 2004 Archived December 6, 2010, at the Wayback Machine

^ Robert North Roberts; Scott Hammond; Valerie A. Sulfaro (2012). Presidential Campaigns, Slogans, Issues, and Platforms: The Complete Encyclopedia [3 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 538. ISBN 9780313380938.

^ Sean Wilentz, The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974–2008 (2009); John Ehrman, The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan (2008).

^ a b Ashbee, Edward; Waddan, Alex (December 13, 2023). "US Republicans and the New Fusionism". The Political Quarterly. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341. ISSN 1467-923X.

^ "The growing peril of national conservatism". The Economist. February 15, 2024. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 15, 2024.

^ "The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation". The Economist. October 26, 2023. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved February 14, 2024.

^ Peter J. Jacques; Riley E. Dunlap; Mark Freeman, The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism, Environmental Politics. v12 m3 (2008), pp. 349–385.

^ George H. Nash, Reappraising the Right: The Past and Future of American Conservatism (2009) p. 325.

^ "Rudy Giuliani on Nuclear Energy". neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2021.

^ "The Candidates On Climate Change". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 20, 2012.

^ Tom Zeller Jr. (October 20, 2011). "Republican Environmental Group Seeks To Put Conservation Back On The Conservative Agenda". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on December 24, 2011. Retrieved December 24, 2011.

^ Broder, John M. (August 17, 2011). "Bashing EPA is New Theme in GOP Race". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 17, 2015. Retrieved August 16, 2015.

^ McCright, Aaron M.; Dunlap, Riley E. (2000). "Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims". Social Problems. 47 (4): 499–522. doi:10.2307/3097132. JSTOR 3097132.

^ Levin, Mark R. (2009). "On EnviroStatism". Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto. Simon and Schuster. pp. 114–146. ISBN 9781416562856. Retrieved February 11, 2013.

^ "How Americans See Climate Change and the Environment in 7 Charts". Archived from the original on December 1, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2020.

^ Bailey, Christopher J. (1998). Congress and Air Pollution: Environmental Policies in the USA. Manchester University Press. p. 259. ISBN 0-7190-3661-5.

^ Cama, Timothy (April 15, 2015). "GOP criticizes Obama's 'restrictive' offshore drilling plan". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 21, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2015.

^ Michael Kraft (2015). Environmental Policy and Politics. University of Wisconsin-Green Bay. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-317-34862-7.

^ Popovich, Nadja (June 2, 2019). "The Trump Administration Is Reversing 100 Environmental Rules. Here's the Full List". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.

^ Selby, Nick (July 17, 2017). "Police Aren't Targeting and Killing Black Men". National Review. Archived from the original on November 5, 2021. Retrieved November 4, 2021.

^ Michael W. Flamm, Law and Order: Street Crime, Civil Unrest, and the Crisis of Liberalism in the 1960s (2005).

^ "Immigration reform stalled decade after Gang of 8′s big push". AP News. April 3, 2023. Archived from the original on April 3, 2023. Retrieved April 3, 2023.

^ "Welfare Reforms Reduce Poverty" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2006.

^ "Welfare Reforms Reduce Welfare Dependence" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 22, 2014.

^ "Why Republicans have long wanted to shut Education Department". Chicago Tribune. June 20, 2018. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved July 10, 2022.

^ Wachino, V (March 10, 2005). "The House Budget Committee's Proposed Medicaid and SCHIP Cuts Are Larger Than Those The Administration Proposed". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Archived from the original on November 28, 2008. Retrieved July 10, 2022.

^ a b "True believers". The Economist. June 12, 2012. Archived from the original on February 10, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.

^ "In U.S., Nearly Half Identify as Economically Conservative". May 25, 2012. Archived from the original on February 10, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.

^ a b Barrett, Ted (June 19, 2019). "McConnell opposes paying reparations: 'None of us currently living are responsible' for slavery". CNN.

^ "Clarence Thomas: The Justice Nobody Knows". CBS. September 27, 2007. Archived from the original on May 17, 2013. Retrieved November 4, 2021.

^ Holmes, David G. (2007). "Affirmative Reaction: Kennedy, Nixon, King, and the Evolution of Color-Blind Rhetoric". Rhetoric Review. 26 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1080/07350190709336684. ISSN 0735-0198. JSTOR 20176758. S2CID 144516819. Archived from the original on November 5, 2021. Retrieved November 5, 2021.

^ Wise, Alana (September 17, 2020). "Trump Announces 'Patriotic Education' Commission, A Largely Political Move". NPR. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020.

^ "A majority of Americans want to preserve Confederate monuments: Reuters/Ipsos poll". Reuters. August 21, 2017.

^ Linley Sanders (June 1, 2020). "YouGov Police Reform America Poll". YouGov.

^ Schaefer, Richard T. (2008). Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society. Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-2694-2.

^ Peter N. Stearns, Meaning over Memory: Recasting the Teaching of Culture and History (1993).

^ Roger Chapman; James Ciment; Corey Fields (2015). "Multicultural conservatism". Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints and Voices. Routledge. p. 440. ISBN 978-1-317-47351-0.Barbara Goodwin (2016). Using Political Ideas. John Wiley & Sons. p. 173. ISBN 978-1-118-70838-5.

^ Milton Gordon, "E Pluribus Unum? The Myth of the Melting Pot." in Heike Paul (2014). The Myths That Made America: An Introduction to American Studies. transcript Verlag. pp. 257–310. ISBN 9783839414859.

^ Olivier Zunz, John Bodnar, and Stephan Thernstrom, "American History and the Changing Meaning of Assimilation" Journal of American Ethnic History 4#2 (1985): 53–84.

^ Bruce Pilbeam, "Eurabian nightmares: American conservative discourses and the Islamisation of Europe," Journal of Transatlantic Studies (2011) 9#2 pp. 151–171.

^ Ross Douthat, "The Two Crises of Conservatism: The G.O.P. doesn't know how to win majorities; the right doesn't know what it's conserving anymore," The New York Times April 24, 2021 Archived April 25, 2021, at the Wayback Machine

^ Gallup, Inc. (January 9, 2015). "U.S. Liberals at Record 24%, but Still Trail Conservatives". Gallup.com. Archived from the original on September 2, 2017. Retrieved April 4, 2015.

^ Juliana Horowitz, "Winds of Political Change Haven't Shifted Public's Ideology Balance," Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, press release November 25, 2008 Archived July 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine

^ Gallup, "U.S. Political Ideology Stable With Conservatives Leading" Gallup, August 1, 2011, online Archived August 8, 2017, at the Wayback Machine

^ Gilberstadt, Hannah; Daniller, Andrew (January 17, 2020). "Liberals make up the largest share of Democratic voters, but their growth has slowed in recent years". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on January 17, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.

^ Florida, Richard (2011). "The Conservative States of America". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2017.

^ Florida, Richard (2012). "Why America Keeps Getting More Conservative". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2017.

^ Kuziemko, Ilyana; Washington, Ebonya (October 2018). "Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate". American Economic Review. 108 (10): 2830–67. doi:10.1257/aer.20161413. JSTOR 26528340. S2CID 12245953.

^ Glaser, James (1998). "Race, Campaign Politics, and the Realignment in the South". Yale University Press. Archived from the original on June 5, 2019. Retrieved June 9, 2018.

^ Moseley, Daniel (June 25, 2011). "What is Libertarianism?". Basic Income Studies. 6 (2): 2. doi:10.1515/1932-0183.1215. S2CID 154364669. SSRN 1872578.

^ Boaz, David; David Kirby (January 21, 2010). "The Libertarian Vote in the Age of Obama". Policy Analysis. Cato Institute. Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2012.

^ a b Jones, Jeffrey M. (February 22, 2019). "Conservatives Greatly Outnumber Liberals in 19 U.S. States". Gallup. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved December 27, 2021.

^ Brownstein, Ronald. "Republicans and Democrats increasingly really do occupy different worlds". CNN. Archived from the original on October 24, 2018. Retrieved October 24, 2018.

^ "The changing colors of America (1960–2004)". November 10, 2004. Archived from the original on January 6, 2012. Retrieved January 6, 2012.

^ Russello, Gerald J., 1996, "The Jurisprudence of Russell Kirk," Modern Age 38: 354–363. ISSN 0026-7457.

^ Book Review Archived November 9, 2020, at the Wayback Machine by Robert S. Griffin of Chilton Williamson Jr., The Conservative Bookshelf: Essential Works That Impact Today's Conservative Thinkers, robertsgriffin.com Archived January 26, 2021, at the Wayback Machine.

^ Stephen Goode, Higher Education: Uniting the Great Books and Faith Archived May 19, 2011, at the Wayback Machine (August 2, 2004), Thomas Aquinas College.

^ "The Russell Kirk Center: Ten Conservative Principles by Russell Kirk". kirkcenter.org. March 19, 2007. Archived from the original on May 20, 2017. Retrieved August 2, 2014.

^ Lewis L. Gould, The William Howard Taft Presidency (2009) p. 175

^ Mark A. Graber and Michael Perhac, Marbury versus Madison: documents and commentary (2002) p. 111.

^ Jeff Shesol, Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (2010) p. 525.

^ "Conservatives and the Court". Archived from the original on October 24, 2018. Retrieved October 24, 2018.

^ Graber and Perhac, Marbury versus Madison: documents and commentary (2002) p. 114

^ Mark V. Tushnet, A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law (2005) p. 338.

^ Johnathan O'Neill, Originalism in American law and politics: a constitutional history (2005) pp. 7–11, 208.

^ Center for the Study of Federalism, "U.S. Constitution (2017) online Archived March 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine.

^ Herman Schwartz, "The Supreme Court's federalism: Fig leaf for conservatives." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574.1 (2001): 119–131. online Archived February 3, 2021, at the Wayback Machine.

^ Mugambi Jouet (2017). Exceptional America: What Divides Americans from the World and from Each Other. U of California Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780520293298.

^ "Conservative epithet of choice: Socialist". UPI. March 1, 2009. Archived from the original on September 28, 2017. Retrieved May 27, 2017. Crary, David (June 4, 2012). "Obama a socialist? Many scoff, but claim persists". Deseret News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 29, 2017. Retrieved May 27, 2017.

^ David Hinshaw, A Man from Kansas: The Story of William Allen White (1945) p. 108.

^ Thomas Frank (2007). What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. Picador. p. 33. ISBN 9781429900324.

^ William Safire (2008). Safire's Political Dictionary. Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 9780199711116.

^ Grimes, Alan P. (1962). "Contemporary American Liberalism". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 344. p. 30. doi:10.1177/000271626234400104. JSTOR 1033072. S2CID 145230852.

^ Gary Dean Best (1983). Herbert Hoover, the Postpresidential Years, 1933–1964: 1946–1964. Hoover Press. p. 359. ISBN 9780817977511.

^ Lawson Bowling (2005). Shapers of the Great Debate on the Great Society: A Biographical Dictionary. Greenwood. p. 137. ISBN 9780313314346.

^ "The Duel to the Death in California". Life. May 29, 1964. p. 29.

^ Tom Kemme (1987). Political Fiction, the Spirit of Age, and Allen Drury. Popular Press. p. 12. ISBN 9780879723743.

^ Mikkelson, David (September 26, 2009). "Norman Thomas on Socialism". Snopes. Archived from the original on May 6, 2022. Retrieved May 6, 2022.

^ Emery, C. Eugene Jr. (November 2, 2018). "No evidence for Norman Thomas quote on Democrats embracing 1940s socialism". PoliFact. Archived from the original on May 16, 2022. Retrieved May 6, 2022.

^ a b Tom Schaller, "Gingrich Slams Paulson, Obama, Sarbanes-Oxley and Even W (a little)" FiveThirtyEight May 24, 2010 Archived February 1, 2021, at the Wayback Machine

^ William G. Mayer,"Why talk radio is conservative." Public Interest 156 (2004): 86–103.

^ Jeffrey M. Berry and Sarah Sobieraj, "Understanding the rise of talk radio." PS: Political Science & Politics 44#4 (2011): 762–767.

^ Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Joseph N. Cappella (2009). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford U.P. pp. 42–55. ISBN 9780199740864.

^ Jeremy M. Peters, "'Anybody but Mitt,'" The New York Times Nov. 19, 2011 Archived January 13, 2021, at the Wayback Machine.

^ "House Republicans Defend Conservative Commentators, Decry White House Feud". Fox News. April 7, 2010. Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved January 6, 2012.

^ Theda Skocpol; Vanessa Williamson (2012). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford University Press, US. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-19-983263-7.

^ Roger Chapman; James Ciment (March 17, 2015). Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints and Voices. Routledge. p. 179. ISBN 978-1-317-47351-0.

^ Lee Banville (2016). Covering American Politics in the 21st Century: An Encyclopedia of News Media Titans, Trends, and Controversies [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. pp. 193–195. ISBN 978-1-4408-3553-7.

^ Tim Groseclose, PhD (2011). Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. St. Martin's Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-4299-8746-2.

^ Frum, David (November 20, 2011). "When Did the GOP Lose Touch With Reality?". New York. Archived from the original on January 24, 2012. Retrieved January 6, 2012.

^ Kozlowski, Austin C (March 17, 2021). "How Conservatives Lost Confidence in Science: The Role of Ideological Alignment in Political Polarization". Social Forces. 100 (soab020): 1415–1443. doi:10.1093/sf/soab020. ISSN 0037-7732.

^ Gauchat, Gordon (April 1, 2012). "Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010". American Sociological Review. 77 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225. ISSN 0003-1224. S2CID 17725502. Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Alt URL Archived April 16, 2021, at the Wayback Machine

^ Gabel, Matthew; Gooblar, Jonathan; Roe, Catherine M.; Morris, John C. (February 4, 2021). "The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 3120. Bibcode:2021NatSR..11.3120G. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82516-6. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 7862386. PMID 33542334.

^ a b Stein, Randy; Swan, Alexander B.; Sarraf, Michelle (2021). "Hearing From Both Sides: Differences Between Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Toward Scientific and Experiential Evidence". Political Psychology. 42 (3): 443–461. doi:10.1111/pops.12706. ISSN 1467-9221. S2CID 228936019. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.

^ Dixon, Graham; Hmielowski, Jay; Ma, Yanni (August 1, 2017). "Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting". Science Communication. 39 (4): 520–534. doi:10.1177/1075547017715473. ISSN 1075-5470. S2CID 148742721.

^ "U.S. Public Views on Climate and Energy". Pew Research Center Science & Society. November 25, 2019. Archived from the original on April 5, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.

^ Motta, Matthew (2021). "Republicans, Not Democrats, Are More Likely to Endorse Anti-Vaccine Misinformation". American Politics Research. 49 (5): 428–438. doi:10.1177/1532673X211022639. ISSN 1532-673X. S2CID 236145137.

^ Everett Carll Ladd and Seymour Martin Lipset, Academics, politics, and the 1972 election (1973)

^ Jack H. Schuster and Martin J. Finkelstein, The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers (2008) p. 145

^ Louis Menand, The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University (2010) pp. 137–139

^ "Kurtz, H. (29 March 2005)". The Washington Post. March 29, 2005. Archived from the original on June 4, 2012. Retrieved August 26, 2017.

^ Robert Maranto; Richard E. Redding; Frederick M. Hess, eds. (2009). The Politically Correct University: Problems, Scope, and Reforms (PDF). The AEI Press. pp. 25–27. ISBN 978-0-8447-4317-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 13, 2011. Retrieved August 4, 2012.

^ Rothman, S.; Lichter, S. R.; Nevitte, N. (2005). "Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty". The Forum. 3. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1067. S2CID 145340516.

^ Kurtz, Howard (March 29, 2005). "College Faculties A Most Liberal Lot, Study Finds". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 4, 2012. Retrieved August 26, 2017.

^ Inbar, Yoel; Lammers, Joris (2012). "Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology" (PDF). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7 (5): 496–503. doi:10.1177/1745691612448792. PMID 26168506. S2CID 23012460. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2013.

^ Emily Esfahani Smith (August 1, 2012). "Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they'd discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement: 'Impossible lack of diversity' reflects ideological intimidation on campus". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on August 5, 2012. Retrieved August 5, 2012.

^ "Zogby Poll: Most Think Political Bias Among College Professors a Serious Problem". zogby.com. July 10, 2007. Archived from the original on October 21, 2011.

^ Sonny, Bunch (May 18, 2007). "Academic Thuggery". Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on August 5, 2012. Retrieved August 6, 2012.

^ Kerr, Euan (October 27, 2007). ""Indoctrinate U" poses some uncomfortable questions". Minnesota Public Radio. Archived from the original on October 30, 2013. Retrieved August 6, 2012.

^ Barry, Emily (March 3, 2011). "'Indoctrine U' raises brows, offers insight". East Tennessean. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved August 5, 2012.

^ Krugman, Paul (February 8, 2011). "Ideas Are Not The Same As Race". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 3, 2012. Retrieved August 4, 2012.

^ Cohen, Patricia (November 2, 2008). "Professors' Liberalism Contagious? Maybe Not". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 15, 2012. Retrieved August 4, 2012.

^ Douglas Kellner (2001). Grand Theft 2000: Media Spectacle and a Stolen Election. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 140. ISBN 9780742521032.

^ Hanson, Victor (Autumn 2008). Anderson, Brian (ed.). "The Humanities Move Off Campus". City Journal. Manhattan Institute. Archived from the original on June 23, 2015. Retrieved June 23, 2015.

^ Ellen Grigsby (2008). Analyzing Politics. Cengage Learning. p. 161. ISBN 978-0495501121.

^ Kellner, Grand Theft 2000 p. 140

^ Gertrude Himmelfarb (2004). The New History and the Old: Critical Essays and Reappraisals. Harvard University Press. p. 16. ISBN 9780674013841.

^ Jay Stevenson (2007). The Complete Idiot's Guide to English Literature. Alpha Books. pp. 9–10. ISBN 9781592576562.

^ Gerald J. Russello, The Postmodern Imagination of Russell Kirk (2007) p. 14

^ Hyrum S. Lewis (2007). Sacralizing the Right: William F. Buckley Jr., Whittaker Chambers, Will Herberg and the Transformation of Intellectual Conservatism, 1945–1964. p. 122. ISBN 9780549389996.[permanent dead link]

^ M. Keith Booker (2005). Encyclopedia of Literature and Politics: A-G. Greenwood. pp. 180–181. ISBN 9780313329395.

^ Jeffrey Williams, ed. PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy (Routledge, 2013).

^ Santin, Bryan M. (2021). Postwar American Fiction and the Rise of Modern Conservatism: A Literary History, 1945–2008. Cambridge University Press. pp. 17–19. ISBN 9781108961974.

^ Kim Phillips-Fein, "Conservatism: A State of the Field," Journal of American History (Dec 2011) 98#3 pp. 723–743, with commentary by Wilfred M. McClay, Alan Brinkley, Donald T. Critchlow, Martin Durham, Matthew D. Lassiter, and Lisa McGirr, and response by Phillips-Fein, pp. 744–773 online.

^ Jefferson Cowie, and Nick Salvatore, "The Long Exception: Rethinking the Place of the New Deal in American History," International Labor & Working-Class History, (2008) 74: 3–32.

^ Julian E. Zelizer, "Rethinking the History of American Conservatism," Reviews in American History (2010) 38#2 pp. 367–392, quoting pp. 372, 379.

^ Zelizer, "Rethinking the History of American Conservatism," p. 379, quote p. 380.

^ Stephen Brooks (2013). American Exceptionalism in the Age of Obama. Routledge. pp. 76–77. ISBN 9780415636414.

^ Seymour Martin Lipset (1997). American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword. W.W. Norton. pp. 17, 291. ISBN 9780393316148.

^ Seymour Martin Lipset, The first new nation (1963).

^ Martin Griffiths (November 26, 2013). Encyclopedia of International Relations and Global Politics. Taylor & Francis. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-135-19087-3.David Bernell (2012). Constructing US Foreign Policy: The Curious Case of Cuba. Routledge. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-136-81411-2.

^ Lipset, American Exceptionalism, pp. 1, 17–19, 165–174, 197

^ "In Defense of American Exceptionalism," The American Spectator "the conditions American Exceptionalism provides Archived October 18, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, allow us to enjoy the economic and social mobility that other countries envy" and "progressivism rejects American Exceptionalism".

^ Harold Koh, "America's Jekyll-and-Hyde Exceptionalism", in Michael Ignatieff, ed.American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (2005) p. 112.

^ Louis Hartz, The Liberal Tradition in America (1955), p. 17

^ Rainer-Olaf Schultze et al., Conservative parties and right-wing politics in North America (2003), p. 15 online Archived April 5, 2023, at the Wayback Machine

^ Arthur Aughey, et al., The conservative political tradition in Britain and the United States (1992), pp. 1–2. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press. 1992. ISBN 9780838635001.

^ Richard Hofstadter (2008). The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. Vintage Books. p. 43. ISBN 9780307388445.

^ a b c d Rossiter, Clinton, "The Giants of American Conservatism" Archived September 1, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, American Heritage 1955 6(6): 56–59, 94–96

^ Richard K. Sherwin (2017). Popular Culture and Law. Taylor & Francis. p. 462. ISBN 9781351553728.

Further reading[edit]

Main article: Bibliography of conservatism in the United States

Aberbach, Joel D. "Understanding American Political Conservatism". in Robert A. Scott and Stephen M. Kosslyn, eds. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource (2015). doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0373

Aberbach, Joel D., and Gillian Peele, eds. Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics after Bush (Oxford UP, 2011). 403pp

Adams, Ian (2001). Political Ideology Today. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0-719-06020-6.

Allitt, Patrick. The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History (2010) excerpt and text search

Bowen, Michael, The Roots of Modern Conservatism: Dewey, Taft, and the Battle for the Soul of the Republican Party. (U of North Carolina Press, 2011). xii, 254pp.

Clark, Barry Stewart (1998). Political Economy: A Comparative Approach. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-275-95869-8.

Continetti, Matthew. The Right: The Hundred-Year War for American Conservatism (2022) excerpt

Critchlow, Donald T. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the Republican Right Rose to Power in Modern America (2nd ed. 2011) excerpt

Critchlow, Donald T. and Nancy MacLean. Debating the American Conservative Movement: 1945 to the Present (2009)

Critchlow, Donald T. Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism (Princeton UP, 2018).

Farber, David. The Rise and Fall of Modern American Conservatism: A Short History (2012).

Filler, Louis. Dictionary of American Conservatism (Philosophical Library, 1987) online

Frohnen, Bruce et al. eds. American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia (2006); the most detailed reference

Gabler, Neal. Against the Wind: Edward Kennedy and the Rise of Conservatism, 1976-2009 (2022) excerpt, major scholarly biography of the leading opponent of conservatism in Congress

Gottfried, Paul. The Conservative Movement (Twayne, 1993.) online

Gross, Neil, Thomas Medvetz, and Rupert Russell. "The Contemporary American Conservative Movement," Annual Review of Sociology (2011) 37 pp. 325–354

Guttman, Allan. The Conservative Tradition in America (Oxford University Press, 1967).

Harp, Gillis J. Protestants and American Conservatism: a short history (Oxford UP, 2019).

Hayward, Steven F. The Age of Reagan: The Fall of the Old Liberal Order: 1964–1980 (2009) excerpt v 1; The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution 1980–1989 (2009) excerpt and text search v2

Hemmer, Nicole. Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2016). xvi, 320 pp.

Huntington, John S. Far-Right Vanguard: The Radical Roots of Modern Conservatism (U of Pennsylvania Press, 2021).

Kabaservice, Geoffrey. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, From Eisenhower to the Tea Party (2012) scholarly history favorable to moderates excerpt and text search

Lauck, Jon K. and Catherine McNicol Stock, eds. The Conservative Heartland: A Political History of the Postwar American Midwest (UP of Kansas, 2020) online review

Lora, Ronald. The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America Greenwood Press, 1999

Lyons, Paul. American Conservatism: Thinking It, Teaching It. (Vanderbilt University Press, 2009). 202 pp. ISBN 978-0-8265-1626-8

Nash, George. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 (2006; 1st ed. 1978) influential history

O'Brien, John, and Eman Abdelhadi. "Re-examining restructuring: racialization, religious conservatism, and political leanings in contemporary American life". Social Forces 99.2 (2020): 474–503. online

Pafford, John M. The Forgotten Conservative: Rediscovering Grover Cleveland (Simon and Schuster, 2013). excerpt

Phillips-Fein, Kim. Invisible Hands: The Businessmen's Crusade Against the New Deal (2009) excerpt; same book also published as Invisible hands: the making of the conservative movement from the New Deal to Reagan

Postell, Joseph W. and Johnathan O'Neill, eds. Toward an American Conservatism: Constitutional Conservatism during the Progressive Era (2013).

Postell, Joseph W. and Johnathan O'Neill, eds. American Conservatism: 1900–1930 (Lexington Press, 2020)

Reinhard, David W. The Republican right since 1945 (UP of Kentucky, 2014) online.

Rosen, Eliot A. The Republican Party in the Age of Roosevelt: Sources of Anti-Government Conservatism in the United States (2014)

Sawyer, Logan. "Originalism from the Soft Southern Strategy to the New Right: The Constitutional Politics of Sam Ervin Jr". Journal of Policy History 33.1 (2021): 32–59. online

Schneider, Gregory. The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution (2009)

Sexton, Patricia Cayo. The war on labor and the left: Understanding America's unique conservatism (Routledge, 2018).

Thorne, Melvin J. American Conservative Thought since World War II: The Core Ideas (1990)

Historiography and memory[edit]

Brinkley, Alan. "The Problem of American Conservatism," American Historical Review, 99 (April 1994), 409–29. A highly influential proposal to study the topic.

Cebul, Brent, Lily Geismer, and Mason B. Williams, eds. Shaped by the state: Toward a new political history of the twentieth century (University of Chicago Press, 2019) online.

Phillips-Fein, Kim. "Conservatism: A State of the Field," Journal of American History (Dec 2011) 98#3 pp. 723–743, with commentary by Wilfred M. McClay, Alan Brinkley, Donald T. Critchlow, Martin Durham, Matthew D. Lassiter, and Lisa McGirr, and response by Phillips-Fein, pp. 744–773 in JSTOR

Lassiter, Matthew D. "Political History beyond the Red-Blue Divide". Journal of American History 98.3 (2011): 760–764. online

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Conservatism in the United States.

"The Origins of the Modern American Conservative Movement," The Heritage Foundation.

"Conservative Predominance in the U.S.: A Moment or an Era?", 21 experts from the U.S. and abroad, ponder the future of conservatism.

Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Conservatism at the University of Virginia.

"Comparative Decades: Conservatism in the 1920s and 1980s" Lesson plans

Mark Riebling, "Prospectus for a Critique of Conservative Reason."

A History of Conservative Movements – slideshow by Newsweek

How Corporate America Invented Christian America Archived August 22, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Kevin M. Kruse for Politico. April 16, 2015.

vteConservatism in the United StatesSchools

Compassionate

Fiscal

Fusionism

Libertarian

Social

Neo-

Paleo-

Traditionalist

Principles

American exceptionalism

Classical liberalism

Family values

Free market

Free trade

Judeo-Christian values

Limited government

Moral absolutism

Natural law

Protectionism

Republicanism

Rule of law

Tradition

History

Timeline of modern American conservatism

PeoplePresidents

Adams (John)

Adams (John Quincy)

Arthur

G. H. W. Bush

G. W. Bush

Cleveland

Coolidge

Fillmore

Ford

Harding

Hoover

Johnson

McKinley

Nixon

Pierce

Reagan

W. H. Taft

Taylor

Trump

Tyler

Washington

Supreme Court justices

Alito

Barrett

Burger

Butler

Fuller

Gorsuch

Harlan

Kavanaugh

Kennedy

McReynolds

O'Connor

Rehnquist

Roberts

Scalia

Sutherland

Thomas

Van Devanter

White

Philosophers

Babbitt

Beale

Bork

Breitbart

Buchanan

Buckley

Burnham

Chambers

Friedman

Gottfried

Kemp

Kirk

Kirkpatrick

Kristol

Leo

Meyer

Negroponte

Olson

Rice

Rothbard

Schlesinger

Sowell

Strauss

Tyrrell

A. Williams

W. E. Williams

Wolfowitz

Other figures

Agnew

Ailes

Ashcroft

Atwater

Beck

Boehner

Jeb Bush

Carlson

Carson

Dick Cheney

Liz Cheney

Lynne Cheney

Conway

Coulter

Curtis

Cruz

DeSantis

Dilling

Disney

Dole

Elder

Falwell

Frist

Gingrich

Giuliani

Goldwater

Graham

Hannity

Ingraham

Johnson

Koch

LaPierre

Limbaugh

Lindbergh

Lodge

Longworth

Lott

Lovecraft

Martin

Mercer

McCain

McCarthy

McConnell

Murdoch

Norquist

Novak

O'Reilly

Palin

Rand Paul

Ron Paul

Pence

Perot

Powell

Quayle

Romney

Rove

Rumsfeld

Ryan

Sessions

Schlafly

Shapiro

Stone

Robert A. Taft

Booker T. Washington

Parties

American Freedom Party

American Independent Party

American Party

Anti-Masonic Party

Conservative Party of New York

Constitution Party

Constitutional Union Party

Democratic Party (early factions until the 1890s)

Democratic-Republican Party (elements)

Federalist Party

National Republican Party

Native American Party

Nullifier Party

Prohibition Party

Reform Party

Republican Party

Whig Party

Movements

Alt-right

Asian and Pacific Islander conservatism

Black conservatism

Christian right

Conservative Democrats

Hispanic and Latino conservatism

Women in conservatism

Green conservatism

LGBT conservatism

Movement

New Right

Old Right

Patriot movement

QAnon

Radical Right

Right-libertarianism

Rockefeller Republican

Tea Party movement

Trumpism

Think tanks

Acton Institute

Alexis de Tocqueville Institution

American Enterprise Institute

American Compass

Center for Security Policy

Center for the National Interest

Charles Koch Institute

Claremont Institute

Competitive Enterprise Institute

David Horowitz Freedom Center

Discovery Institute

Ethics and Public Policy Center

Family Research Institute

Gatestone Institute

Heartland Institute

The Heritage Foundation

Hoover Institution

Hudson Institute

Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Leadership Institute

Manhattan Institute

Mises Institute

Pacific Research Institute

Project for the New American Century

Ripon Society

R Street Institute

Rockford Institute

State Policy Network

Tax FoundationHistorical factions

Bourbon Democrats

Dixiecrats

Loyalists

Old Right

Redeemers

Southern Agrarians

Scholarly study

The Conservative Illusion (1959)

See also

American nationalism

Bibliography of conservatism in the United States

List of American conservatives

National conservatism

Southern strategy

Conservatism portal

vteSocial conservatism in the United StatesIssues and ideas

Anti-abortion

Anti–death penalty

Anti-LGBT

Anti-pornography movement

Bioconservatism

Culture of life

Culture war

Consistent life ethic

Eminent domain

Euthanasia

Familialism

Family values

Gender roles

Organized religion

Prohibition of drugs

Public morality

Religious liberty

School prayer

Friendly separation of church and state

Advocates

Abbott

Ashcroft

Bachmann

Baldwin

Bannon

Barton

Bennett

Brownback

Bryant

Boebert

Boykin

Bozell III

Buchanan

Cameron

Carlson

Carson

Coburn

Colson

Cruz

DeLay

DeMint

DeSantis

Dice

Dobson

Donohue

D'Souza

Falwell Sr.

Falwell Jr.

Frist

George

Gingrich

Gohmert

Harris

Helms

Hostettler

Huckabee

Johnson

Jones

Kennedy

Keyes

King

Kirk

Knowles

LaHaye

LaHaye

Limbaugh

Lott

McCarthy

Moore

Owens

Palin

Parsley

Pence (Greg)

Pence (Mike)

Perkins

Peroutka

Perry

Phillips

Pool

Prager

Raichik

Reed

Robertson

Robinson

Ruzicka

Santorum

Scarborough

Schlafly

Schundler

Scott

Shapiro

Stenzel

Stuckey

Tancredo

Tatum

Greene

Thomas

Trump

Walsh

Groups

Concerned Women for America

Eagle Forum

Family Research Council

Focus on the Family

Foundation for Moral Law

Heritage Foundation

Moms for Liberty

Moral Majority

National Center on Sexual Exploitation

National Organization for Marriage

National Right to Life Committee

Parents Television and Media Council

Traditional Values Coalition

Political parties

American Solidarity Party

Constitution Party

Prohibition Party

Republican Party

Related

Christian democracy

Christian Right

Culture wars

Factions in the Republican Party

LGBT conservatism in the United States

Manhattan Declaration

Paleoconservatism

Reactionary

Straight pride

Social justice

 Conservatism portal

vteConservatism

Timeline

Schoolsby regionInternational

Authoritarian

Corporatist

Cultural

Fiscal

Green

Liberal

Moderate

National

Paternalistic

Populist

Pragmatic

Progressive

Reactionary

Religious

Social

Traditionalist

Ultra

North AmericaCanada

Populism

Trumpism

Clerico-nationalism

Social

Toryism

Blue

Red

Pink

UnitedStates

Compassionate

Libertarian

Fusionism

Paleo

Tea Party

Movement

Neo

Old Right

Paleo

Reaganism

Social

Traditionalist

Trumpism

Latin AmericaArgentina

Federal Peronism

Menemism

Orthodox Peronism

Brazil

Bolsonarism

Coronelism

Integralism

Janismo

Monarchist

Patrianovism

Populism

Chilean

Gremialismo

Pinochetism

Other

Belize

Colombian

Rojismo

Uribism

Cuba

Guatemala

Mexico

Panama

Peruvian

Fujimorism

 Odriismo

Venezuelan

Perezjimenismo

AsiaChina

Chiangism

Confucianism

Neo

New

Neoauthoritarianism

Israel

Fundamentalist

Jewish

Kahanism

Zionism

Neo

Religious

Revisionist

Japan

Neo

Nippon Kaigi

Shōwa Statism

State Shinto

South Korea

Ilminism

New Right

Turkey

Democratic

Erdoğanism

Neo-Ottomanism

Other

Bangladesh

Hong Kong

India

Iran

Monarchist

Malaysia

Pakistan

Singapore

Taiwan

Chiangism

EuropeFrance

Action Française

Bonapartism

Gaullism

Integral nationalism

Legitimism

Maurrassisme

Nouvelle Droite

Orléanism

Sarkozysm

Ultra-royalism

Germany

Agrarian

Hegelian

Historical School

Neue Rechte

Ordoliberalism

Revolutionary

Young

Ritter School

Romanticism

State Socialism

Italy

Berlusconism

Historical Right

Italian school of elitism

Sanfedismo

Poland

Golden Liberty

Kaczyzm

National Democracy

Sarmatism

Russia

Eurasianism

Monarchist

Black-hundredism

Tsarism

Putinism

Slavophilia

Pochvennichestvo

Spain

Alfonsism

Carlism

Carloctavismo

Carlo-francoism

Francoism

National Catholicism

Integrism

Mellismo

Maurism

Neocatholicism

Noucentisme

UnitedKingdom

Cameronism

Compassionate

Muscular liberalism

Neo

One-nationism

Powellism

Thatcherism

Toryism

High

Red

Social

Other

Austria

Belgium

Denmark

Finland

Georgia

Monarchist

Greece

Metaxism

Populism

Iceland

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Norway

Portugal

Miguelist

Romania

Monarchist

Serbia

Monarchist

Sweden

Switzerland

Ukraine

Oceania

Australia

Centre Right

National Right

New Zealand

PhilosophyConcepts

Ancestral worship

Authority

Traditional

Class collaboration

Convention

Cultural heritage

Culture of life

Pro-Life

Custom

Discipline

Duty

Elitism

Aristocracy

Meritocracy

Noblesse oblige

Ethical order

Familialism

Family values

Fundamentalism

Gender role

Complementarianism

Honour

Imperialism

Loyalty

Monarchism

Royalism

Ordered liberty

Organicism

Orthodoxy

Patriotism

Private property

Public morality

Social hierarchy

Social institutions

Social norm

Social order

Solidarity

Sovereignty

Stewardship

Subsidiarity

Tradition

Philosophers

Bainville

Barruel

Belloc

Bonald

Buckley Jr.

Burke

Burnham

Chateaubriand

Chesterton

Coleridge

Comte

Cortés

Dávila

Dostoevsky

Eliot

Evola

Gentz

Haller

Hitchens

Hume

Iorga

Johnson

Jünger

Karamzin

Kirk

Kuehnelt-Leddihn

La Mennais

Le Bon

Le Play

Leontiev

Lewis

Maistre

Mansfield

Maurras

Menéndez

More

Müller

Newman

Nisbet

Novalis

Oakeshott

Corrêa de Oliveira

Ranke

Rivarol

Röpke

Santayana

Savigny

Schlegel

Schmitt

Scruton

Solzhenitsyn

Sowell

Spann

Spengler

Stahl

Strauss

Taine

Tocqueville

Uvarov

Voegelin

PoliticsOrganisations

Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

European Conservatives and Reformists Party

European People's Party

Identity and Democracy

International Democrat Union

Muslim Brotherhood

Tradition, Family, Property

Politicians

Abe

Adams

Adenauer

Andreotti

Berlusconi

Bismarck

Bolsonaro

Bush Jr.

Canning

Chiang

Churchill

Diefenbaker

Disraeli

Dmowski

Dollfuss

Erdoğan

Franco

Fujimori

de Gaulle

Harper

Horthy

John Paul II

Kaczyński

Khamenei

Khomeini

Kohl

Le Pen

Lee

Macdonald

Mannerheim

Marcos

Maurras

Menzies

Metaxas

Metternich

Mobutu

Modi

Netanyahu

Orbán

Park

Pérez Jiménez

Pinochet

Pitt

Powell

Prat de la Riba

Putin

Reagan

Salazar

Salisbury

Smith

Stolypin

Suharto

Thatcher

Trujillo

Trump

de Valera

Zemmour

Religion

Anglo-Catholicism

Christian right

Theoconservatism

Clericalism

Conservative Christianity

Hindutva

Jewish conservatism

Religious Zionism

Islamism

Traditionalist Catholicism

Integralism

Ultramontanism

Traditionalist School

Perennialism

Historicalbackground

Ancien Régime

Bourbon Restauration

Congress of Vienna

Conservative Order

Counter-Enlightenment

German Romanticism

Holy Alliance

Ultra-royalism

RelatedIdeologies

Agrarianism

Christian democracy

Clerical fascism

Communitarianism

Conservative liberalism

Corporatism

Anti-communism

Anti-gender movement

Anti-Masonry

Aristocracy

Black conservatism

United States

Catholic social teaching

Conservative feminism

Conservative wave

Counter-revolutionary

Elite theory

Hispanic conservatism

United States

LGBT conservatism

Radical right

Europe

United States

Reactionary

Neo

Right realism

Right-wing politics

Authoritarianism

New

Europe

Old

Small-c conservatives

Conservatism portal

Politics portal

vteConservatism in North America Sovereign states

Antigua and Barbuda

Bahamas

Barbados

Belize

Canada

Costa Rica

Cuba

Dominica

Dominican Republic

El Salvador

Grenada

Guatemala

Haiti

Honduras

Jamaica

Mexico

Nicaragua

Panama

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Trinidad and Tobago

United States

Dependencies andother territories

Anguilla

Aruba

Bermuda

Bonaire

British Virgin Islands

Cayman Islands

Curaçao

Greenland

Guadeloupe

Martinique

Montserrat

Puerto Rico

Saint Barthélemy

Saint Martin

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

Saba

Sint Eustatius

Sint Maarten

Turks and Caicos Islands

United States Virgin Islands

Portals: Conservatism Politics United States

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&oldid=1213256061"

Categories: Conservatism in the United StatesAmerican exceptionalismFiscal conservatismHidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from April 2022Webarchive template wayback linksAll articles with dead external linksArticles with dead external links from March 2018Articles with permanently dead external linksArticles with dead external links from May 2023Articles with short descriptionShort description is different from WikidataUse American English from March 2019All Wikipedia articles written in American EnglishUse mdy dates from September 2021Articles containing French-language textArticles with minor POV problems from December 2020All articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from September 2022Commons category link from WikidataArticles with excerptsArticles containing video clips

This page was last edited on 11 March 2024, at 23:06 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0;

additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view

Toggle limited content width

Just a moment...

a moment...Enable JavaScript and cookies to conti

conservative adjective - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com

conservative adjective - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com

Toggle navigation

Redeem

Upgrade

Help

Sign in

Dictionaries

Dictionaries home

English

American English

Academic

Collocations

German-English

Grammar

Grammar home

Practical English Usage

Learn & Practise Grammar (Beta)

Word Lists

Word Lists home

My Word Lists

Topics

Recent additions

Resources

Resources home

Text Checker

Sign in

Dictionaries

Dictionaries home

English

American English

Academic

Collocations

German-English

Grammar

Grammar home

Practical English Usage

Learn & Practise Grammar (Beta)

Word Lists

Word Lists home

My Word Lists

Topics

Recent additions

Resources

Resources home

Text Checker

Redeem

Upgrade

Help

TOP

English

English

American English

Academic English

Collocations

Practical English Usage

German-English

English-German

English

American English

Enter search text

Definition of conservative adjective from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

conservative adjective OPAL W  /kənˈsɜːvətɪv/  /kənˈsɜːrvətɪv/

jump to other results

  opposed to great or sudden social change; showing that you prefer traditional styles and valuesthe conservative views of his parentsmusic which is accessible to an audience with extremely conservative tastesThe southern state's inhabitants tend to be socially conservative.Her style of dress was never conservative. conservative in something They were deeply conservative in their outlook.Extra ExamplesBanks are notoriously conservative about their dealings with clients.Her views are by no means ideologically conservative.She takes a basically conservative view of society.a fundamentally conservative political outlooka staunchly conservative nomineea traditionally conservative professionmoderately conservative votersthe army's inherently conservative valuesthe culturally conservative world of commerce and industryPopular taste in art remained conservative.She was dressed neatly in conservative black.The peasantry were no longer a conservative force in society.With age, enthusiasm for the radical is often replaced with more conservative views of the world.Topics Politicsb2Oxford Collocations Dictionaryverbsbebecomeremain…adverbextremelyfairlyvery…See full entry

Join us

Join our community to access the latest language learning and assessment tips from Oxford University Press!

(usually Conservative) connected with the British Conservative PartyConservative members/supportersTopics Politicsb2Oxford Collocations Dictionaryverbsbebecomeremain…adverbextremelyfairlyvery…See full entry

(of an estimate) lower than what is probably the real amount or numberAt a conservative estimate, he'll be earning £50 000.The gloomy forecasts are based on overly conservative projections of growth. Word Originlate Middle English (in the sense ‘aiming to preserve’): from late Latin conservativus, from conservat- ‘conserved’, from the verb conservare ‘to preserve’, from con- ‘together’ + servare ‘to keep’. Current senses date from the mid 19th cent.See conservative in the Oxford Advanced American DictionarySee conservative in the Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Academic EnglishCheck pronunciation:

conservative

Other results

All matches

conservative noun

the Conservative Party noun

the Conservative Monday Club

the Conservative Private Members' Committee

Nearby words

conservationist noun

conservatism noun

conservative adjective

conservative noun

conservatively adverb

boost

verb

 

 

From the Topic

Change, cause and effect

B2

Oxford Learner's Dictionaries Word of the Day

Oxford Learner's Dictionaries

Browse Dictionaries & Grammar

Search Box

System Requirements

Contact Us

More from us

Oxford Learner's Dictionaries API

English Language Teaching

Oxford Teacher's Club

Oxford Learner's Bookshelf

Oxford Languages

Who we are

About Us

Our history

Annual report

The way we work

Working for OUP

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

Consent Management

Terms & Conditions

Accessibility

Legal Notice

English (UK)

English (US)

© 2024 Oxford University Press

What Is a Conservative? Understanding How the Term Works in American Politics | Teen Vogue

Is a Conservative? Understanding How the Term Works in American Politics | Teen VogueSkip to main contentNewsletterSearchSearchSTYLEPOLITICSCULTUREIDENTITYVIDEOSUMMITSHOPPINGNewsletterPoliticsWhat Is a Conservative? Understanding How the Term Works in American PoliticsKeywords is a column that decodes the lingo of American politics and media.By John Patrick Leary August 4, 2023Wally McNamee/Getty ImagesThis column is supported by the journalism nonprofit the Economic Hardship Reporting Project.The evergreen questions raised by the label “conservative” are: Conserving what and from whom?Let’s dispense with one popular answer to this question, asserted by many American conservatives and liberals alike: that proper conservatives are devoted to “small government” or engaged in protecting “individual liberties” from a big government. These are slogans of today’s Republican Party, but there’s no good argument to believe that the party behind the War on Drugs (Richard Nixon, and later Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and every Republican since), the PATRIOT Act (George W. Bush), the first and second Iraq War (Both Bushes), massive police funding, eliminating the right to abortion, Don’t Say Gay laws, and school book bans is, in any way that makes sense, devoted to “limiting” the power of the government. To make sense of the word "conservative" we have to dig deeper than headlines and slogans.Like a lot of our political vocabulary — see also: “left” and “right,” — the political meaning of “conservative” came as a result of the French Revolution of 1789, when democratic radicals deposed the monarchy and the aristocracy. Soon after, in 1818, defenders of the French Old Regime founded a pro-monarchy journal, Le Conservateur, that first used “conservative” in the modern, political sense. The magazine listed what it stood for in its first issue: “religion, the King, liberty…and upstanding people.” These were the things under threat from the new society formed after the Revolution.Modern-day conservatives don’t necessarily want to protect or “conserve” the same things as their 19th-century brethren. (Not too many Americans will admit to being monarchists.) But they do share a fundamental dilemma with their French forebears: Defining yourself in terms of an old order and its enemies makes it difficult to explain the sort of future you want to build. On one hand, conservatives defend tradition and duty; on the other, the definitions of these things shift with every generation. And what good is a tradition if it changes all the time?In 1790, the Irishman Edmund Burke authored Reflections on the Revolution in France, a polemic against the revolution that has become the foundational text of English-language conservatives. Burke didn’t share the backward-looking attitude of Le Conservateur. Burke conceded that societies needed to transform over time, but he argued for a principle of social change that followed the examples of changes in “nature” or families, that is, slowly, over generations, and never all at once. Burke thought society should “conserve” what is worthy about past traditions, making judgments about what should and should not endure. (I’d note this is the difference between a preservative, which preserves something, whether it be strawberries or something else, just the way it was, and a conservative, which conserves something about it.) As Burke wrote, “A state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation.” In other words, a society and its traditions cannot endure unless it can also change.This brings us back to the original question: What should change and what should endure, and what is the principle by which one decides? Again, conservatives face the problem of defining themselves negatively, against what they dislike. “Liberal,” by contrast, takes its name from a positive ideal — liberty. “Conservative,” much like “progressive,” names only an attitude about political change over time. In 1960, the economist Friedrich Hayek, who many people would describe as politically conservative, wrote an essay titled, “Why I Am Not A Conservative,” in which he argued that conservatives had not overcome this basic problem. “By its very nature,” Hayek wrote, conservatism “cannot offer an alternative to the direction in which we are moving.” It defined itself only against other political identities, he wrote, decrying what it is against without offering a positive direction of its own.Political scientist Corey Robin has recently argued that conservatism’s most consistent traits are 1) a veneration of hierarchy and order and 2) a fear of the lower orders. “Though it is often claimed that the left stands for equality while the right stands for freedom,” wrote Robin in his 2011 book The Reactionary Mind, “this notion misstates the actual disagreement between right and left. Historically, the conservative has favored liberty for the higher orders and constraint for the lower orders.” And, he goes on, it has historically defined itself against the movements it opposes.To be fair, all political persuasions define themselves, in part, by what they are against. But it’s especially true of conservatism, whose very name signals commitment to conserving something being lost or taken away. This helps explain the never-ending identity crisis that shapes so much of the culture of American conservatives, which is engaged in constant arguments about what it means to be a true conservative (and the confessional mini-genre of articles called, “Why I Am A Conservative”). It also explains why so many on the right battle phantoms like “wokeness,” “critical race theory,” or the “gay agenda,” forever seeking new enemies to define themselves against. Seeking a more positive definition, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) defines conservatism as “the political philosophy that sovereignty resides in the person.” Unfortunately for CPAC, plenty of political philosophers would say this is also a definition of “liberalism.”One of the most eloquent rejoinders to the veneration of tradition in conservative thought comes from the American revolutionary Thomas Paine, who criticized Burke’s opposition to the French Revolution. What, Paine asked, are you actually for? Like American conservatives who proclaim their commitment to “conservative values” in a society riven by inequality, fear, and violence, Paine thought Burke was enchanted more by talking about virtue than he was by building a society that supported it.  Burke “pities the plumage,” wrote Paine, “but forgets the dying bird.”Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue TakeWant more U.S. government coverage?The True Story of a White Supremacist Insurrection in the U.S.The Main Arguments Against Student Debt Cancellation Are WrongWhat It’s Like to Live In a State Run By Politicians You Can’t StandWhat It’s Like to Be the Daughter of a Supreme Court JusticeThe Current Supreme Court Is IllegitimateKeywordsKeywordsu.s. governmentpoliticsrepublicanssupreme courtu.s. historyRead MoreIdentityFrance Made Abortion a Constitutional Right as a Reaction to Roe Being OverturnedHere's what the country's latest protections mean.By Angie JaimePoliticsWhat Does ‘Solidarity’ Actually Mean?It’s a threat to business-as-usual.By Astra TaylorPoliticsI’m a Rabbi Who Is Calling for Ceasefire. Here’s Why.It’s what my dad, a Holocaust survivor, would have wanted.By Rabbi Elliot KuklaIdentityGhana's Parliament Passed a an Anti-Gay Bill That Could "Legitimize Prejudice"If the bill becomes law, "it will exacerbate fear and hatred," experts say.By Angie JaimeThe young person’s guide to conquering (and saving) the world. Teen Vogue covers the latest in celebrity news, politics, fashion, beauty, wellness, lifestyle, and entertainment.FacebookXPinterestInstagramTiktokMore from Teen VogueAbout Teen VogueNewsletter SignupVideoContactContact UsCareersUser AgreementPrivacy Policy & Cookie StatementYour California Privacy RightsAccessibility HelpCondé Nast StoreVisual StoriesDo Not Sell My Personal Info© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Teen Vogue may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choi